|
Originally Posted by Fnord
What did you know about LP and did he seriously consider folding, insta-shove or put on a one act drama? There is a lot of donk psychology here, but some context would help a lot.
It was my first hand at the table, so unfortunately I didn't know anything about him. He didn't first pump instashove his chips, but he still seemed comfortable putting the chips in.
I'm assuming that if I think he's hollywooding, he's probably stronger. Or if he looks genuinely uncomfortable, then he's weaker.
Originally Posted by Fnord
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 18.833% 18.11% 00.73% 12312472008 494301504.00 { 22+, A2s+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, A2o+, KJo+, QJo }
Hand 1: 49.422% 48.79% 00.63% 33177332448 430111692.00 { QQ+, AKs, AKo }
Hand 2: 31.744% 31.53% 00.21% 21441053880 145092900.00 { JJ }
My problem when thinking about this hand is that I put the EP raiser on a much tighter shove range. I don't really agree with A2o+, but I think I agree with everything else. And in that case it looks like an okay call since I also agree that sometimes LP is shoving wider.
Originally Posted by Rupeni
That's in my opinion... correct me if I'm wrong/add to or remove... but it seems the best way to get max money on the flop against the hands you want in (weaker queens and weaker flush draws) is to check raise - they're calling two raises instead of one. But gutted if it checks through...
Aside from what Fnord said, I also wanted to keep worse flush draws in.
Originally Posted by Fnord
If you lead the flop, one pair hands will jam the flop to get it in goodish against draws or peel intending to get it in on a blank turn unless they see something that makes them think you beat one pair.
Do you like leading better then? I couldn't decide between leading and check/calling.
|