|
littleogre
|
07-29-2007, 12:51 AM
Post subject: What is the softest low stakes limit room left for american
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
|
|
I would like the know what poker room that still excepts americans has the softest and most profitable low stakes limit games. By low stakes i mean 50c/1 and less.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
|
|
Pokerstars/Full Tilt due to player base.
However, I would try to bonus whore and rakeback whore UB/AP to get out of .5/1 ASAP. You cannot cannot cannot try to grind .5/1 online and think you'll be able to beat the rake. IMO it's vital to get to 2/4 b/c you can clear a ton of bonus and rakeback. You can earn more than 1bb/100 at FT with bonus/rb at 2/4.
|
|
|
|
littleogre
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
|
|
Ok question 2 can i get rakeback at ft if i already have an account but have never deposited there?
|
|
|
|
Nehmer
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 666
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
You cannot cannot cannot try to grind .5/1 online and think you'll be able to beat the rake.
|
This is a VERY false statement that a lot of people like to make. I have a VERY large sample size at .5/1 from my years of playing poker online(I'll play there when I don't feel like a challenge or there are absolutely no other good games on stars). My winrate overall is over 2BB/100 at .5/1....It is definately very possible to beat the rake and keep up a good winrate.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
The problem with limit is that it doesn't take much to play a pretty big pot and you can't crush people with big edges very often. Also, thanks to Ed Miller the multi-tablers have gotten more aggressive and fold less often. Finally, it's not very much fun being the only fish at the table, playing mediumish pots against whoever happens to have a real hand this orbit (as opposed to schooling the best hand in a MONSTER pot.)
Even if you don't like NLHE, there are far far better games online unless you can find a nice small site with a fish pond (try the small sports books.)
|
|
|
|
|~|ypermegachi
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: emo-kid
Posts: 3,580
|
|
[quote="Nehmer"]
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
You cannot cannot cannot try to grind .5/1 online and think you'll be able to beat the rake.[/quote
This is a VERY false statement that a lot of people like to make. I have a VERY large sample size at .5/1 from my years of playing poker online
|
filter out for post-UIGEA
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nehmer
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
You cannot cannot cannot try to grind .5/1 online and think you'll be able to beat the rake.
|
This is a VERY false statement that a lot of people like to make. I have a VERY large sample size at .5/1 from my years of playing poker online(I'll play there when I don't feel like a challenge or there are absolutely no other good games on stars). My winrate overall is over 2BB/100 at .5/1....It is definately very possible to beat the rake and keep up a good winrate.
|
I'm sorry dude and I respect all the stuff you say but the rake is oppressive at .5/1. Earning 2bb/100 after bonus/rb is doable but not on it's own nowadays.
|
|
|
|
Nehmer
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 666
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
I'm sorry dude and I respect all the stuff you say but the rake is oppressive at .5/1. Earning 2bb/100 after Bonus/rb is doable but not on it's own nowadays.
|
I only have about 5000 hands at .5/1 since UIGEA and I ran at 1.97 BB/100...Not long enough for an accurate measure, but enough hands to determine that the players there are still terrible and the jump from .5/1 to 1/2(where the rake is still oppressive) is the biggest jump in skill while moving up in limit hold-em. Really the only limit where the rake isn't oppressive until you get above 5/10 is 2/4 and suggesting that somebody skip straight to 2/4 if they are only bankrolled for .5/1 is just a bad idea.
I would much rather play against terrible players and pay a slightly higher % in rake than to play much better players in a game I'm not really rolled for Luckily though I already did grind the really low stakes, so I am rolled for the higher games and don't have to worry about this stuff anymore.
|
|
|
|
Knytestorme
|
|
Flush
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 562
|
|
Question in regard to this....assuming I have worked my way up to ~$3k br playing on MTT/SnG's/FR NL what level should I look at for moving to 6 max limit (having played maybe 100 hands total of limit so far) to grind out bonus's at places like UB and Vegas?
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
frankly, I havent seen the low stake LHE games this good in months and months.. Most of the old grinders have switched to NL post-legislation in the belief that "LHE IS DEAD" and this really just left the fish behind.
I played some absolute 2/4 a few weeks ago and I was f'n amazed.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Where the players retardedly loose or the ever-popular kinda-tight but still really terrible sort?
Still, if I play my old 3/6 style of full table wreckage that made me sick money the SSHE guys pretty much won't put up with my crap.
|
|
|