Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

UTG+1

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
LeFou
Old 05-29-2005, 07:19 PM     Post subject: UTG+1 #1 (permalink)  
LeFou's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,361
LeFou
This position's always been a little weird for me. Conflicting incentives...

-I don't like open limping here. I like to set the tone by getting into it immediately with a strong hand.
BUT
-This is a great spot to limp the above-average drawing hands (98s, Q9s, T8s? etc.) If you get even one limper after you, the pot odds are nice even if it's raised in back. Usually the number of players attracted by the size of the pot helps you out.
BUT
-If not ... say it folds to LP or button, who raises, you can't be real happy. SSH calls this stuff playable in EP without a raise, and that you'll have to (already crying) call a raise behind because of the pot size. But how big?

One solution I've had is to base it on what UTG does. If heshe calls, I'll muck stuff like this -- UTG's plausible range is just flat out superior to these cards. But if UTG folds I limp and cross my fingers. Raised in back, I'll drop it unless at least one of the blinds is with us -- that way I'll have position on at least one player for god's sake.

Your thoughts?
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Nehmer
Old 05-29-2005, 07:28 PM     Post subject: Re: UTG+1 #2 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 666
Nehmer
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeFou
-This is a great spot to limp the above-average drawing hands (98s, Q9s, T8s? etc.) If you get even one limper after you, the pot odds are nice even if it's raised in back. Usually the number of players attracted by the size of the pot helps you out.
No way do I even consider playing any of those hands from UTG+1 in anything, but the worst possible tables...Probably not even then.
Reply With Quote
LeFou
Old 05-29-2005, 07:39 PM     Post subject: Re: UTG+1 #3 (permalink)  
LeFou's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,361
LeFou
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nehmer
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeFou
-This is a great spot to limp the above-average drawing hands (98s, Q9s, T8s? etc.) If you get even one limper after you, the pot odds are nice even if it's raised in back. Usually the number of players attracted by the size of the pot helps you out.
No way do I even consider playing any of those hands from UTG+1 in anything, but the worst possible tables...Probably not even then.
I think you're missing out.
Reply With Quote
Room
Old 05-29-2005, 11:31 PM     Post subject: Re: UTG+1 #4 (permalink)  
Straight

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 197
Room
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nehmer
No way do I even consider playing any of those hands from UTG+1 in anything, but the worst possible tables...Probably not even then.
I'm with you. You can be easily dominated by hands being raised behind you and will be out of position for the entire hand. The table has to be super loose passive preflop, as well as 5-7 way on the flop, for me to think about limping in EP with marginal hands.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 05-30-2005, 03:45 PM #5 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
I'm folding JTs UTG these days unless I know there are multiple fish in the water.

In a multi-pot, UTG is IMHO a WORSE position than the SB.

When I look to add hands, I'm looking for button/co limps, isolation raises, selective 3-bets, blind theft and blind defense.

A while ago I started tracking the amount of profit I make from limping. I was under-whelmed
 
Reply With Quote
Xanadu
Old 05-30-2005, 05:56 PM #6 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: May 2005
Location: st. paul, MO
Posts: 966
Xanadu
I think your thinking backwards on responding to what UTG does. The extra bet gives you better odds, the fold gives you worse odds. What do you care if he has Aces, you're going for a straight or a flush. But, aside from that, UTG +1 is way too early to play most of those hands. If the table typically has 6 see the flop I'll play Axs and suited connectors down to T9. No one gappers. On a tight table, most of these hands are folds. On a table with 4 seeing the flop on average, most of these hands are probably folds.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:45 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.