Poker Forum
|
Over 1,246,000 Posts!
|
|
|
|
Romulus141
|
12-20-2005, 05:24 PM
Post subject: Two High PP hands
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oxford, PA
Posts: 118
|
|
For both hands, is there a place where I should just give up the hand or at least find a way to protect it better?
Hand #1:
SB is 83/0/0.19 (passive post-flop) after 12 hands
MP2 is 50/8/1.50 (semi-aggressive post-flop) after 12 hands
PokerStars 0.10/0.20 Hold'em (9 handed) pokerhand.org hand converter
Preflop: Hero is MP3 with Q , Q .
UTG calls, 2 folds, MP2 raises, Hero 3-bets, 2 folds, SB calls, 1 fold, UTG calls, MP2 caps, Hero calls, SB calls, UTG calls.
Flop: (17 SB) J , 4 , J (4 players)
SB checks, UTG checks, MP2 bets, Hero raises, SB calls, UTG folds, MP2 calls.
Turn: (11.50 BB) 5 (3 players)
SB checks, MP2 checks, Hero bets, SB calls, MP2 calls.
River: (14.50 BB) A (3 players)
SB bets, MP2 calls, Hero calls.
Final Pot: 17.50 BB
Hand 2:
UTG+2 is 83/0/0.19 (passive post-flop) after 12 hands
MP1 is 36/0/1.00 (passive post-flop) after 14 hands
MP3 is 23/13/0.70 (passive post-flop) after 48 hands
PokerStars 0.10/0.20 Hold'em (10 handed) pokerhand.org hand converter
Preflop: Hero is SB with K , K .
1 fold, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 raises, 1 fold, Button calls, Hero 3-bets, 1 fold, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, Button folds.
Flop: (21 SB) 8 , 6 , J (6 players)
Hero bets, UTG+1 folds, UTG+2 calls, MP1 calls, MP2 folds, MP3 calls.
Turn: (12.50 BB) 2 (4 players)
Hero bets, UTG+2 calls, MP1 calls, MP3 calls.
River: (16.50 BB) A (4 players)
Hero checks, UTG+2 checks, MP1 bets, MP3 calls, Hero calls, UTG+2 folds.
Final Pot: 19.50 BB
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
outphase
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 949
|
|
hand 1: the pot is inflated, i'm not sure if calling was right on the river because SB is passive post flop
hand 2: fire out the river to see where you really stand
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lambchopdc
Lets stop talking ABC poker and move on to D, E, and F.
|
|
|
rubixstreub
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 887
|
|
Would anyone ever try for a check raise on that flop in hand 2 to try and cut the field? Or just grit your teeth and lead into that army of callers?
|
|
|
|
Kessler
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 117
|
|
Hand 2: I would probably go for the C/R on the Flop, considering that MP3 was the initial pre-flop raiser, and will now probably bet. Considering that he has 0% PFR's in 48 hands makes me think he's got a strong holding. Maybe QQ or A-broadway suited because he didn't reraise Preflop?
-Kes
|
|
If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.
|
|
Romulus141
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oxford, PA
Posts: 118
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kessler
Hand 2: I would probably go for the C/R on the Flop, considering that MP3 was the initial pre-flop raiser, and will now probably bet. Considering that he has 0% PFR's in 48 hands makes me think he's got a strong holding. Maybe QQ or A-broadway suited because he didn't reraise Preflop?
-Kes
|
That was a typo on my part. I put another slash where I should have put a decimal point, so MP3's PFR% was 13.
Still, your point's valid. He most likely would have bet had I checked. Duly noted.
|
|
|
|
thenonsequitur
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 637
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rubixstreub
Would anyone ever try for a check raise on that flop in hand 2 to try and cut the field? Or just grit your teeth and lead into that army of callers?
|
Not even two bets is going to stop that army of callers--they all have great odds to chase anything even for two bets. Since MP3 sitting immediately to your right showed aggression preflop, you can probably count on him to bet if you show weakness. With this in mind I check/call the flop then check/raise the turn. You want to keep the pot as small as possible on the flop so that when you force most of the field to make a decision for 2BB on the turn they can't correctly call with holdings like gutshots. I think this is the only way to effectively protect your hand, and I believe it is the most +EV way to play this hand.
|
|
|
|
Romulus141
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oxford, PA
Posts: 118
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thenonsequitur
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rubixstreub
Would anyone ever try for a check raise on that flop in hand 2 to try and cut the field? Or just grit your teeth and lead into that army of callers?
|
Not even two bets is going to stop that army of callers--they all have great odds to chase anything even for two bets. Since MP3 sitting immediately to your right showed aggression preflop, you can probably count on him to bet if you show weakness. With this in mind I check/call the flop then check/raise the turn. You want to keep the pot as small as possible on the flop so that when you force most of the field to make a decision for 2BB on the turn they can't correctly call with holdings like gutshots. I think this is the only way to effectively protect your hand, and I believe it is the most +EV way to play this hand.
|
You know, I've never thought of it that way before... purposely keeping the pot small to ruin odds in later rounds. Granted, it's standard poker theory, and I should know this, but... I think this is one of my bigger leaks now that I think about it. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
thenonsequitur
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 637
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Romulus141
You know, I've never thought of it that way before... purposely keeping the pot small to ruin odds in later rounds. Granted, it's standard poker theory, and I should know this, but... I think this is one of my bigger leaks now that I think about it. Thanks!
|
Don't thank me. Thank SSH pages 163-165.
And these situations come up rarely enough that it can't really be a big leak.
|
|
|
|
Romulus141
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oxford, PA
Posts: 118
|
|
*Opens SSH to pages 163-165 and slowly reads*
*smacks forehead*
You're right. Damn, every time I read this section I must have spaced out. Geez...
Still, I appreciate you pointing this out to me, since now I actually understand this concept since I have my own real-world example to look at.
|
|
|
|
Kessler
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 117
|
|
At .10/.20 do you think the other players at the table are considering pot odds?
|
|
If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.
|
|
Latest Poker News
|
|
KoRnholio
|
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
|
|
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 PM.
|