|
TylerK
|
05-09-2005, 03:22 AM
Post subject: Too straightforward or what?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME
Posts: 1,791
|
|
I can't help but think that being a little less obvious might have won me a couple more bets...
PokerStars 2/4 Hold'em (10 handed) converter
Preflop: Hero is UTG with A , A .
Hero raises, 1 fold, UTG+2 3-bets, 7 folds, Hero caps, UTG+2 calls.
Flop: (9.50 SB) 3 , 5 , 8 (2 players)
Hero bets, UTG+2 calls.
Turn: (5.75 BB) 5 (2 players)
Hero bets, UTG+2 calls.
River: (7.75 BB) 9 (2 players)
Hero bets, UTG+2 calls.
Final Pot: 9.75 BB
|
|
TylerK: its just gambling if i want to worry about money i'll go to work lol
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
|~|ypermegachi
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: emo-kid
Posts: 3,580
|
|
you'll lose bets more often than gain bets by trying to check-raise them.
|
|
|
|
ChezJ
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 1,456
|
|
i just found this in theory of poker pg 68:
...with two aces against a good player in a limit hold 'em game, you should often not put in all bets. A reraise is fine because you could have a variety of hands. However, if your single opponent reraises again, you should probably just call. If you raise one more time, your opponent figures you for two aces. All you have gained is one small extra bet right there, but you may have cost yourself two or three bets later on. In this case, you have lost too much by giving your hand away. You stand to gain more by using deception.
this was immediately following a paragraph saying that in NL hold 'em, it is worth buying the pot pre-flop if several people have raised, even if it means revealing that you have obvious aces.
personally i fail to understand the distinction. let's discuss.
ChezJ
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
...with two aces against a good player in a limit hold 'em game, you should often not put in all bets. A reraise is fine because you could have a variety of hands. However, if your single opponent reraises again, you should probably just call.
Vegas 5-bet cap. We're working with a 4-bet cap here.
Hero's line is fine, it gives the least risk of missing bets, also quite often the villian will play back at you with KK/QQ/JJ on a flop like that.
I've been looking for check/raises when dealing with players that auto-bet when checked to on the turn, but in a circumstance like this it won't fly often enough without a damn good read.
|
|
|
|
elipsesjeff
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
|
|
call the three bet preflop in a HU situation. Raise the turn no matter what the board is. As long as you look like you might fold to one of his bets (pause a long time before you flop call) then most likely he'll keep betting and you'll get that extra SB from him. Also a chance he'll reraise you on the turn here, giving you an option to cap.
What do you think the probability is of him checking behind on the turn here in relation to the extra 1/2 bet or more you'll get?
|
Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com
More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by elipsesjeff
call the three bet preflop in a HU situation.
|
I disagree. Call as a mix-up, but you should cap most of the time. Given that we're almost always playing against unknowns that mostly suck at this game anyway you can't go very wrong capping here every time. You should be capping AA/KK/QQ/AK in this spot anyway against an unknown. Although cap range is strongly impacted my our villian's 3-bet range. Against a pre-flop aggro villian JJ/TT become capping hands.
Are you better off getting in .5BB with the nuts and a huge edge or trying to get in a bet later when you may not even have the best hand? Also consider that having a smaller pot and c/ring the turn might be more likely to make a hand you're a huge favorite over correctly fold instead of call down.
Limit hold'em is a game where boring, straight forward play more often than not gets the money.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Exhibit A:
Hero raises AA, Villian 3-bets AKo w/ position, Hero calls.
Flop: blank
Hero checks, Villian bets, Hero calls
Turn: blank
Hero checks, Villian checks (planning to call any non A or K river, otherwise raise), Hero cries
Hero checks, Villian bets, Hero raises, Villian folds
Hero checks, Villian bets, Hero raises, Villian calls down taking AK to his grave (net +.5BB)
Exhibit B:
Hero raises AA, Villian 3-bets JJo w/ position, Hero calls.
Flop: ???
Hero checks, Villian bets, Hero calls
Turn: ???
Hero checks, Villian bets, Hero raises
Villian may fold
Villian probably calls down (net +.5BB)
Villian 3-bets his set and you pretty much have to call-down.
|
|
|
|
Shark Bait
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 481
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Limit hold'em is a game where boring, straight forward play more often than not gets the money.
|
I agree with this mostly. People that get cute and check raise and slow play are going to either not win as much as they could have, or lose to a someone that got some cheap cards.
I have no problem capping preflop with aces, I don't care if they think I've got them, there is no way I'm going to let them see a flop cheaply with some crap cards.
What's so wrong with making everyone fold? Pocket aces don't win every time. I'd rather take the sure thing and win 2BB instead of keeping everyone in the hand and lowering your chances of winning significantly.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shark Bait
What's so wrong with making everyone fold? Pocket aces don't win every time. I'd rather take the sure thing and win 2BB instead of keeping everyone in the hand and lowering your chances of winning significantly.
|
I'd rather them make a call with 2 (or 0) outs than fold.
|
|
|
|
ChezJ
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 1,456
|
|
yes i went thru the same thought process as fnord outlined when i made my post. my conclusion was that aces are the best hand pre flop so you might as well cap it preflop instead of getting fancy for a minimal extra bet at a huge risk. maybe sklansky's implication is that the risk is very small in a heads up situation. i don't care, i'd rather take the sure thing and get my money in up front before the board fucks me.
ChezJ
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ChezJ
maybe sklansky's implication is that the risk is very small in a heads up situation.
|
Details, details. In the example given, you've been 4-bet, so you shouldn't 5-bet-cap because it would give away too much information. Also, quite often Sklansky's earlier material assumes you're dealing with a reasonable player unless stated otherwise.
|
|
|
|
elipsesjeff
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
|
|
If my read is a TAg I'm not capping preflop. If he's a fish i'm pumping as much as I can out of him.
|
Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com
More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
|