|
dsaxton
|
05-29-2008, 03:48 PM
Post subject: Are these bets too thin?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,667
|
|
Villain is unknown. Too thin?
PokerStars 2/4 Hold'em (6 handed) Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
Preflop: Hero is SB with Q , Q .
3 folds, Button raises, Hero 3-bets, 1 fold, Button calls.
Flop: (7 SB) 2 , 5 , 8 (2 players)
Hero bets, Button raises, Hero 3-bets, Button caps, Hero calls.
Turn: (7.50 BB) A (2 players)
Hero bets, Button calls.
River: (9.50 BB) K (2 players)
Hero bets
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
asdpikas
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,056
|
|
the river is pretty sick
|
|
"could I take out every woman and child in a border town?"
For the right to be governed, waste them without mercy.
When you've decided. Meet me at the airport.
|
|
DrivingDog
|
05-29-2008, 04:02 PM
Post subject: Re: Are these bets too thin?
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 923
|
|
When he caps the flop I put him on a set, 99+, AK, or a FD, maybe AJ/AQ.
With that in mind, I don't really understand the turn lead since you are going to get raised by his Ace hands and probably have to call down because the pot is so big. He might fold KK but I doubt it.
The river lead when the second overcard comes and the FD completes is really spew. What is your plan if he raises? I think c/f is better as played. There's really no value in betting here since a worse hand will never call.
|
|
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on." (George Bush).
|
|
dsaxton
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,667
|
|
The only hands I'm worried about containing an ace are the ace high flush draw and perhaps A-8 since he's not capping the flop with just ace high. If that's what he's holding, he'll probably raise my turn bet and I have an easy fold. Otherwise, he'll just take a free card, which I don't want him to do. By betting, I deny him a free card with his worse hands, and make a correct fold on the turn when beat and avoid paying him off for another bet on the river. When he just calls the turn, I'm fairly sure he has a pair below queens that he played fast on the flop or a flush draw other than the ace high flush draw. Obviously the river is a bad card for me, but I decided to bet anyways to get an extra bet from his worse hands, intending on folding to a raise. Check-folding seems way too weak in this pot, but I can maybe see check-calling. I guess my question was mainly about the river.
|
|
|
|
DrivingDog
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 923
|
|
I can't see a worse hand ever calling this river, so it's not a value-bet it's a "make them fold a worse hand or raise when I'm behind bet" imho.
Regarding c/c vs. c/f, we can debate this but my thinking is when is the last time you saw someone at 2/4 bet third pair in this situation when it was checked to them? I just don't see it happen enough to make c/c correct.
Also if you check they might check behind a scared better hand and you save a bet.
|
|
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on." (George Bush).
|
|
dsaxton
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,667
|
|
You're probably right about the river.
|
|
|