Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Question my Analysis: PP in SB vs Single Limper

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
spoonitnow
Old 10-29-2006, 07:36 AM     Post subject: Question my Analysis: PP in SB vs Single Limper #1 (permalink)  
spoonitnow's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
spoonitnow is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to spoonitnow Send a message via MSN to spoonitnow Send a message via Yahoo to spoonitnow Send a message via Skype™ to spoonitnow
I don't know why this particular scenario has caught my attention, but would someone point out any errors in how I'm thinking about this? Thanks

With big pairs AA-99, I think we're always raising unless there are extremely weird circumstances like the button has a VP$P of 2 and never raises preflop.

With small pairs 55-22, I think we're more tempted to limp and play it for set value, getting 5:1 on completing the small blind assuming the big blind checks. If we raise, it's to isolate against the limper, and a portion of the time that won't keep the big blind out. Even if we do manage to isolate, it's going to be a difficult hand to play out of position on nearly any flop. I think we need to be much better players than our opponents post-flop and I think we need a tight big blind to get value out of raising these hands.

I think the most interesting case happens with the middle pairs 88-66. It seems like they're too good to just call and play for set value, but perhaps not good enough to overcome the positional disadvantage. Here the range of the limper and the tightness of the big blind become key to deciding how we're going to play. It seems that in general we want to raise more when the big blind is tight and when the limper has a wide range, and that the big blind being tight is a little more important. The last thing we want is to be playing 77 on a A82 board with two spades out of position against two people two bets deep preflop.
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Xanadu
Old 10-29-2006, 04:17 PM #2 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: May 2005
Location: st. paul, MO
Posts: 966
Xanadu
All sounds pretty reasonable to me. I rarely consider an isolation raise with 22-55 in the SB. Isolation is of course so much better with the 66-88 range when the limper is very loose. Isolation is also way better with position. OOP sucks. I don't like to do it for extra bets with marginal hands.
Reply With Quote
outphase
Old 10-29-2006, 04:44 PM #3 (permalink)  
outphase's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 949
outphase
66-99 i'd pop it up if 1. I believe I can get the BB to fold and 2. I believe the limper will fold a "second best hand" in case I miss a set.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lambchopdc
Lets stop talking ABC poker and move on to D, E, and F.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.