|
midas06
|
06-19-2006, 10:58 PM
Post subject: Post your top 20 hands % wise
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,196
|
|
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
arkitekton
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: canada
Posts: 269
|
|
Good idea, midas. I couldn't help noticing your win %s are a LOT higher than mine. Your top 18 are >50%, whereas only my top 7 are >50%. I don't think it's because I'm folding a lot of winners... Any suggestions?
KK 80%
AA 79
QQ 72
AKs 69
AKo 67
JJ 65
AQs 51
AQo 48
KQs 45
AJs 44
ATs 43
QJs 41
TT 41
KJs 39
99 39
KQo 39
AJo 37
JTs 36
88 36
A9s 35
|
|
|
|
tbone
|
06-20-2006, 02:49 PM
Post subject: lower pairs
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 38
|
|
Midas great thread I dont have my poker stats with me but I think your top hands have a higher winning percentage. I think the difference is in your lower pocket pairs. 1010-77. Are you in the helmuth camp with them and ramming and jamming. I play them more for the trips unless im in late position against a weak passive table.
|
|
|
|
thenonsequitur
|
06-20-2006, 03:15 PM
Post subject: Re: lower pairs
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 637
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by arkitekton
I couldn't help noticing your win %s are a LOT higher than mine. Your top 18 are >50%, whereas only my top 7 are >50%. I don't think it's because I'm folding a lot of winners...
|
I think the big difference you are noticing is probably between 6-max and full ring (am I right that you guys are playing different ones? if your numbers are both from the same max players, than never mind). In 6-max I'd suspect that all good hands will win a higher percentage of the time, especially medium to high pocket pairs.
|
|
|
|
midas06
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,196
|
|
Mine are from 6max.
Quote:
|
I think the difference is in your lower pocket pairs. 1010-77. Are you in the helmuth camp with them and ramming and jamming.
|
It depends (yes)
|
|
|
|
arkitekton
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: canada
Posts: 269
|
|
er, if this was a 6-max survery, it should probably go in the shorthanded forum. My stats were from full ring, avg of slightly over 9 players per hand. I'd still be interested in other full ring percentages if anyone wants to post theirs.
|
|
|
|
Nehmer
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 666
|
|
My full ring stats starting in April(big sample size, so I'm guessing it's pretty accurate for my current play style)
Hand / Times / Win% / BB/hand
AA / 572 / 84.27 / 2.35
KK / 614 / 74.29 / 1.63
QQ / 617 / 69.77 / 1.26
AKs / 400 / 65.75 / .83
JJ / 631 / 64.18 / 1.02
AKo / 1212 / 61.06 / .63
AQs / 418 / 58.61 / .65
TT / 624 / 56.41 / .61
AJs / 421 / 52.83 / .36
AQo / 1231 / 51.37 / .30
99 / 605 / 49.60 / .23
KQs / 430 / 47.21 / .33
KJs / 427 / 42.62 / .51
AJo / 1241 / 41.42 / .24
ATs / 454 / 39.65 / .09
88 / 640 / 39.53 / .07
77 / 664 / 37.20 / .17
QJs / 405 / 36.79 / .15
KQo / 1215 / 36.63 / .09
JTs / 430 / 35.12 / .20
|
|
|
|
KoRnholio
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,165
|
|

This is for 2/4, 3/6 and 5/10 full ring.
|
|
Some days it feels like I've been standing forever, waiting for the bank teller to return so I can cash in all these Sklansky Bucks.
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Jesus nehmer, did you type that crap out by hand? What the hell for? Youre crazy man. Crazy. I like you, but youre crazy man.
/stewie
|
|
|