Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Playing straights on the turn

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
MrBigStuff25
Old 10-11-2005, 06:16 PM     Post subject: Playing straights on the turn #1 (permalink)  

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9
MrBigStuff25
These are two hands I played this weekend. On the first one I am pretty sure I should have raised on the turn. I am not so sure on the second one.
What is the best way to play these kind of straights on the turn? And why do you play it that way?

Thanks,

Hand 1
** Game ID 531940661 starting - 2005-10-08 15:59:29
** Battery Eater [Hold 'em] (0.050.10 Fixed Limit - Cash Game) Real Money

** Dealing card to MrBigStuff25:
UTG folded, UTG+1 folded, UTG+2 called, MP1 called, MP2 folded, MP3 folded, CO called, Button folded, SB folded, MrBigStuff25 checked

** Dealing the flop: (4.5 SB, 4 players)
MrBigStuff25 bet, UTG+2 called, MP1 raised, CO called, MrBigStuff25 called, UTG+2 raised, MP1 called, CO called, MrBigStuff25 called

** Dealing the turn: (8.25 BB, 4 players)
MrBigStuff25 bet, UTG+2 raised, MP1 called, CO folded, MrBigStuff25 called - $0.20 (I should have reraised here. It is likely that both players will call again. UTG+2 might have even reraised.)

** Dealing the river: (14.25 SB, 3 players)
MrBigStuff25 bet, UTG+2 called, MP1 called
Results
UTG+2 mucks: 6 of Clubs, 6 of Spades (Three of a kind: Sixes)
MP1 mucks: Queen of Clubs, King of Clubs (Pair: Queens)
MrBigStuff25 wins 17.25 BB (Straight: Eight high)


Hand 2
** Game ID 533280815 starting - 2005-10-09 14:33:48
** Temper Tantrum [Hold 'em] (0.050.10 Fixed Limit - Cash Game) Real Money

SB posted
BB posted
UTG+2 posted to play

** Dealing card to MrBigStuff25:
UTG folded, UTG+1 folded, UTG+2 checked, MrBigStuff25 called, MP2 called, MP3 called, CO called, Button called
SB called, BB checked

** Dealing the flop: (8 SB, 8 players)
SB bet, BB folded, UTG+2 raised, MrBigStuff25 called, MP2 folded, MP3 called, CO called, Button folded, SB called

** Dealing the turn: (9 BB, 6 players)
SB checked, UTG+2 bet, MrBigStuff25 called, MP3 called, CO called, SB called

** Dealing the river: (14 BB, 6 players)
SB checked, UTG+2 checked, MrBigStuff25 bet, MP3 called, CO called, SB folded, UTG+2 called
Result
MP3 mucks: 7 of Spades, Queen of Spades (Pair: Queens)
CO mucks: 7 of Diamonds, 9 of Diamonds (Pair: Nines)
UTG+2 mucks: King of Clubs, 8 of Clubs (Pair: Eights)
MrBigStuff25 wins 18 BB (Straight: Queen High)
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
KoRnholio
Old 10-11-2005, 06:38 PM #2 (permalink)  
KoRnholio's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,165
KoRnholio will become famous soon enough
I would raise the turn on the second hand
Some days it feels like I've been standing forever, waiting for the bank teller to return so I can cash in all these Sklansky Bucks.
 
Reply With Quote
Ltrain
Old 10-11-2005, 06:56 PM #3 (permalink)  
Ltrain's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 514
Ltrain
I check/fold on the first hand. There is a flush coordinated board so your OESD has tainted outs, not only for the flush, but you are also not drawing to a nut straight; I don't see your odds here for a bet or a call. On the turn, you hit your straight but another diamond dominates you and your bet won't drive them out now. Don't let your results fool you, your line here will lose you $$ too often.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoRnholio
I would raise the turn on the second hand
Agreed.
"Don't judge a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes. Then you are a mile away, and have his shoes." - Anon.
 
Reply With Quote
Tim Vecchioni
Old 10-11-2005, 06:58 PM #4 (permalink)  
Tim Vecchioni's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maryland US
Posts: 327
Tim Vecchioni
Send a message via AIM to Tim Vecchioni Send a message via MSN to Tim Vecchioni
hand 1 - you loose call with that OESD, however its easy to get away from if you miss it on the turn..however you still seemed to loose call disregarding the flush out there, also i would be calling his raise on thr turn...i would 3 bet it and see where you stand.. especially 3 handed..cause thats 2 extra bets if you are good..and im a little confused how the k/q didnt raise you on the river since he did all that to finally hit his queen then just calls...anyways...

Hand 2 - i raise this preflop and continuation bet this the whole time til the showdown...
back looking to make some moolah
 
Reply With Quote
MrBigStuff25
Old 10-11-2005, 07:49 PM #5 (permalink)  

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9
MrBigStuff25
So on the first hand I got extremely lucky and played the flop too aggressively, since I really only had 6 outs or less, maybe only the 3 fours since any nine could have made a higher straight. I haven't gotten the whole discounting outs down yet, obviously.

What if the flop had been 7d, Jc, 6h? How many outs would I have had then and what would have been the correct way to play it?

There is so much I need to learn.
Thanks,
Reply With Quote
Tim Vecchioni
Old 10-11-2005, 07:54 PM #6 (permalink)  
Tim Vecchioni's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maryland US
Posts: 327
Tim Vecchioni
Send a message via AIM to Tim Vecchioni Send a message via MSN to Tim Vecchioni
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBigStuff25
So on the first hand I got extremely lucky and played the flop too aggressively, since I really only had 6 outs or less, maybe only the 3 fours since any nine could have made a higher straight. I haven't gotten the whole discounting outs down yet, obviously.

What if the flop had been 7d, Jc, 6h? How many outs would I have had then and what would have been the correct way to play it?

There is so much I need to learn.
Thanks,
you didnt play nothing aggressive you called a raise and the re-raise.. however you are calling with a hand you are im hoping you thought if it hit you knew it was good...that second flop you gave yes it would be better since there is no flush draw...however regardless of the flush draw called a capped flop in a unraised pot preflop...its just questionable...just be glad you hit, but im not sure of the exact % but you dont hit it often..let alone if you did hit like you did here you might not always run into 2 guys who didnt hit thier flush...
back looking to make some moolah
 
Reply With Quote
STIdrivr
Old 10-11-2005, 07:59 PM #7 (permalink)  
STIdrivr's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern california
Posts: 580
STIdrivr
You should have raised the turn on both hands for sure in low limit holdem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Vecchioni
..and im a little confused how the k/q didnt raise you on the river since he did all that to finally hit his queen then just calls.
Because there are lot of calling stations in low limit holdem.
Reply With Quote
elipsesjeff
Old 10-11-2005, 08:01 PM #8 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltrain
I check/fold on the first hand. There is a flush coordinated board so your OESD has tainted outs, not only for the flush, but you are also not drawing to a nut straight; I don't see your odds here for a bet or a call. On the turn, you hit your straight but another diamond dominates you and your bet won't drive them out now. Don't let your results fool you, your line here will lose you $$ too often.
Horrible advice. Way to take an WLLH approach to an SSH scenario. You have a very good draw, 8 outs to a straight, yes, 2 of those are tainted but you have to learn to deal with that, stop being so afraid of flush draws when the vast majority of time it ISNT out there. At most this costs you .5 outs per card so you're probably only at 7 outs, which is still more than enough for this line. The fact you aren't drawing to the nut straight has no bearing whatsover. You are much more likely to win more money by betting than by check/folding. True, on the turn your bet wont drive them out but that doesn't matter, the lone diamond is only going to redraw to a flush here on the river like 17% of the time, less if he's sharing outs with the other idiots at the table. You want him to pay as much as possible for his redraw.

That being said, his line was fine for hand 1, a 3bet on the turn is possible if he has a read of his opponent (like a person that would slowplay set but bet a flush draw).

Hand 2: You've got to raise this turn.


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
Tim Vecchioni
Old 10-11-2005, 08:04 PM #9 (permalink)  
Tim Vecchioni's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maryland US
Posts: 327
Tim Vecchioni
Send a message via AIM to Tim Vecchioni Send a message via MSN to Tim Vecchioni
yawn ... jeff stop re phrasing what i say..lol just kidding
back looking to make some moolah
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 10-11-2005, 08:05 PM #10 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Jeff, are you considering that the pot is only 4.5 sb on the flop? I don't think a fold is a disaster, but I'd have to do the math. With a bigger pot folding here would be stupid.
 
Reply With Quote
elipsesjeff
Old 10-11-2005, 08:13 PM #11 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Jeff, are you considering that the pot is only 4.5 sb on the flop? I don't think a fold is a disaster, but I'd have to do the math. With a bigger pot folding here would be stupid.
Not really, considering that most draws on the flop you dont have that large of a pot anyway (unless you're raising Axs...). he only needs 3-1 normally to be profitable, probably 4-1 with his tainted outs. On second look, UTG+2's limp reraise on the flop screamed set (or flush draw, ironically). By the time it was all over he was getting over 5-1 to call on his draw, and this is only pot odds not counting implied. On the turn once he bets and if it gets raised and reraised only THEN would i consider folding.

Speaking of which, a check/raise on the turn would have been a nice way to pad the pot.


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 10-11-2005, 08:26 PM #12 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Took another look at the first hand.

The flop bet sucks. Players in this game don't like to fold and his draw is pretty weak (against tighter post-flop opponents betting becomes a better play.) I would check and see what happens. Also, you wouldn't really mind it getting checked through; if a flush card comes and your straight misses on the turn you can check/fold this baby pot. If the action is bet, raise to you then you can consider a fold. However, with so much action by multiple loose players, the pot is too bloated post-flop to fold and his bet certainly tied him to the pot.
 
Reply With Quote
elipsesjeff
Old 10-11-2005, 08:41 PM #13 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
The flop bet sucks.
Its not THAT bad. Betting is better than folding. Wouldn't you do the same with a baby flush draw here? Sure, you're not drawing to the nuts but if everyone just calls you are still getting 5-1 on your money, making it +EV.


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
pokerlearner
Old 10-11-2005, 08:48 PM #14 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: california
Posts: 366
pokerlearner
Question for Elipses and Fnord.

On second hand, why isnt it correct to just call the turn. he has the nut straight, the flush draw wont fold. and he wants all 3 players to overcall on the big street. He can raise the river and maybe get a worse hand to call.

I guess my reasoning is all messed up here. I am just trying to learn here.

I sometimes wont raise a four to a flush if I am second to act, and the person before me has bet, but have 3-4 people behind me are yet to act. By raising, i am forcing a few people to fold where as for my flush draw I want people in the pot while I am still drawing. Now if I have 2 overcards and the flush draw then i can raise to buy a few outs.

is this reasoning messed up ?
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 10-11-2005, 08:50 PM #15 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by elipsesjeff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
The flop bet sucks.
Its not THAT bad. Betting is better than folding. Wouldn't you do the same with a baby flush draw here? Sure, you're not drawing to the nuts but if everyone just calls you are still getting 5-1 on your money, making it +EV.
A flush draw is a stronger holding. You're more likely to get a couple callers in this game so banking on all call or all fold is kinda silly. Also, I like letting someone else lead if I'm drawing and I don't think I have enough fold equity to justify taking the lead.

In loose passive games there seems to be an unwritten rule that "There shall be one bet and one bet only on the flop + turn, unless you have 2 pair or better, then you can raise. This bet will be called by anyone with any hope of showing down the winning hand (and many that don't.) When facing 2 bets, all sorts of silly calls and folds will follow"
 
Reply With Quote
Ltrain
Old 10-11-2005, 09:32 PM #16 (permalink)  
Ltrain's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 514
Ltrain
Quote:
Originally Posted by elipsesjeff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltrain
I check/fold on the first hand. There is a flush coordinated board so your OESD has tainted outs, not only for the flush, but you are also not drawing to a nut straight; I don't see your odds here for a bet or a call. On the turn, you hit your straight but another diamond dominates you and your bet won't drive them out now. Don't let your results fool you, your line here will lose you $$ too often.
Horrible advice. Way to take an WLLH approach to an SSH scenario. You have a very good draw, 8 outs to a straight, yes, 2 of those are tainted but you have to learn to deal with that, stop being so afraid of flush draws when the vast majority of time it ISNT out there. At most this costs you .5 outs per card so you're probably only at 7 outs, which is still more than enough for this line. The fact you aren't drawing to the nut straight has no bearing whatsover. You are much more likely to win more money by betting than by check/folding. True, on the turn your bet wont drive them out but that doesn't matter, the lone diamond is only going to redraw to a flush here on the river like 17% of the time, less if he's sharing outs with the other idiots at the table. You want him to pay as much as possible for his redraw.

That being said, his line was fine for hand 1, a 3bet on the turn is possible if he has a read of his opponent (like a person that would slowplay set but bet a flush draw).

Hand 2: You've got to raise this turn.
I have to disagree at this limit with the unlimited type of hands being played back at you. Most players are going to call you down with all sorts of starting hands, including a possible Ad,x that may hit an ace or a runner runner flush. As far as outs, I give him 5 outs as any two diamonds, broadway cards with one diamond, 8,9 and possibly 8,10, 9,10 will call in this spot. The nut straight matters to me by discounting the additional out if an 8,9 or 10 hit the turn.

If Hero is holding 8,9 yes, lead with a bet and don't fear the flush, but I would not lead with this hand in this spot.

Turn- Why does a bet here not lose us more money when we are beaten? We are out of position, hand committed with the straight at this point and we agree that out of the three remaining players, anyone with a diamond is calling our bet with a great redraw to beat us. If we are behind to a flush now, we get raised and are committed to calldown. If we are up against a 4 diamond draw, we won't know it until we are raised at the river on a 4 diamond board and again we have to calldown. Don't we save bets by waiting until the river to raise in this case?
"Don't judge a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes. Then you are a mile away, and have his shoes." - Anon.
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 10-11-2005, 09:36 PM #17 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltrain
Turn- Why does a bet here not lose us more money when we are beaten?
1) Missing bets sucks A LOT worse than paying an extra bet or two when we're behind, with a scare card on the board weak players will check this through too much.
2) I think we're committed to seeing a river, but not to a showdown.
 
Reply With Quote
elipsesjeff
Old 10-11-2005, 09:54 PM #18 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltrain
I have to disagree at this limit with the unlimited type of hands being played back at you. Most players are going to call you down with all sorts of starting hands, including a possible Ad,x that may hit an ace or a runner runner flush.
why do you care if they call you down? That is how you make your money, by their mistakes. Well, i dunno, i could fold because 33 could hit runner runner quads too, its too likely, i have no reason to get involved...(sarcasm). You bet for VALUE.

Quote:
As far as outs, I give him 5 outs as any two diamonds, broadway cards with one diamond, 8,9 and possibly 8,10, 9,10 will call in this spot. The nut straight matters to me by discounting the additional out if an 8,9 or 10 hit the turn.
You are over discounting your hands. How you get from 8 outs to normal to 5 is well beyond me. first, just because he has discounted outs, doesn't meant they aren't partial outs. Also, you cant count other people's runner runner draws against your own odds, well, you can, but they are so miniscule it doesn't matter. Someone else having the straight is even more unlikely as a runner runner draw. You're too weak tight.

Quote:
If Hero is holding 8,9 yes, lead with a bet and don't fear the flush, but I would not lead with this hand in this spot.
You mean to tell me the nut straight draw matters THAT much to you and you don't fear the flush? But, suddenly, because you have a second nut straight draw you do fear the flush? You either fear it or you dont, because in both instances the flush beats a straight.

Quote:
Turn- Why does a bet here not lose us more money when we are beaten? We are out of position, hand committed with the straight at this point and we agree that out of the three remaining players, anyone with a diamond is calling our bet with a great redraw to beat us. If we are behind to a flush now, we get raised and are committed to calldown. If we are up against a 4 diamond draw, we won't know it until we are raised at the river on a 4 diamond board and again we have to calldown. Don't we save bets by waiting until the river to raise in this case?
1) position doesnt matter as much when drawing other than for free card value. Being out of position here could be a blessing when you hit by getting more money in the pot by bet/three betting his hidden draw or even checkraising.

2)redraws shouldn't worry you

3)raising on the river wins you the least when ahead in this scenario because of the 3bet/cap factor but also wins you the least because of other people's passivity.

I'm not disagreeing with you that his draw is not that strong, but you are overplaying the weakness of it and it is much stronger than you believe it is.


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 10-11-2005, 09:58 PM #19 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
In a game where hands like 22 and A2 often see showdown unimproved in multi-way pots and miss lots of easy value raises you don't exploit your opponents for the max by leading with weak draws. If ever there was a time to play a draw for straight up value...

Anyway, I check this flop for information and because I don't see value against typical opponents in a micro-limit game. On the turn it's either a lead or check/raise. I probably would check/raise because a small flush will often just call me down (along with lots of other absurd holdings that won't take the hint) and we're not strong enough to want to put in the 3rd bet.
 
Reply With Quote
elipsesjeff
Old 10-11-2005, 10:06 PM #20 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
In a game where hands like 22 and A2 often see showdown unimproved in multi-way pots and miss lots of easy value raises you don't exploit your opponents for the max by leading with weak draws. If ever there was a time to play a draw for straight up value...

Anyway, I check this flop for information and because I don't see value against typical opponents in a micro-limit game. On the turn it's either a lead or check/raise. I probably would check/raise because a small flush will often just call me down (along with lots of other absurd holdings that won't take the hint) and we're not strong enough to want to put in the 3rd bet.
How many players in the pot does it take for you to lead out here? >5? or <3?

I'm inclined to bet because of the limited aggression preflop (then again it is .05/.1 so your line isnt incorrect).


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 10-11-2005, 10:25 PM #21 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by elipsesjeff
How many players in the pot does it take for you to lead out here? >5? or <3?
6+ to the flop I'm more concerned about the silly flush draw and probably still check here. I doubt it matters much at that point

2 or 3 way I'm more inclined to bet out even in this game. However, in more aggro games against a button that will bet ~90% of the time, I will check/raise for balance because I would rarely lead into him and I don't mind if he checks behind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by elipsesjeff
I'm inclined to bet because of the limited aggression preflop (then again it is .05/.1 so your line isnt incorrect).
Yes, against a tighter post-flop field this is a clear bet. Small pairs will fold in this tiny pot.
 
Reply With Quote
elipsesjeff
Old 10-11-2005, 10:36 PM #22 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
Just for fun, what does pokerstove say about our equity?


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 10-11-2005, 10:39 PM #23 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Against 3 random hands we have an edge...

7,947,972 games 18.183 secs 437,110 games/sec

Board: 7d Jc 6d
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 28.7960 % 27.53% 01.27% { 8s5h }
Hand 2: 23.7427 % 22.61% 01.13% { random }
Hand 3: 23.7393 % 22.61% 01.13% { random }
Hand 4: 23.7220 % 22.60% 01.13% { random }
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 10-11-2005, 10:43 PM #24 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Neat the new PokerStove lets me run against 3 players playing 50% of their hands....

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 27.8409 % 27.17% 00.67% { 8s5h }
Hand 2: 24.0860 % 23.16% 00.93% { 33+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o }
Hand 3: 24.0372 % 23.11% 00.93% { 33+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o }
Hand 4: 24.0358 % 23.11% 00.93% { 33+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o }

3 way we lose our edge...

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 31.9751 % 31.45% 00.52% { 8s5h }
Hand 2: 34.0808 % 32.99% 01.09% { 33+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o }
Hand 3: 33.9441 % 32.86% 01.08% { 33+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o }
 
Reply With Quote
elipsesjeff
Old 10-11-2005, 10:49 PM #25 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
Thats interesting, the more players in the pot the higher our edge? I would have thought the other way around.

That gives you a reason to lead though with 3 opponents because you are more likely to win when they fold. PokerStove assumes everyone sees a showdown everytime.


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 10-11-2005, 10:52 PM #26 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
But if we lead into 3 or 4 opponents and 2 call did we push an edge?
 
Reply With Quote
Ltrain
Old 10-11-2005, 10:58 PM #27 (permalink)  
Ltrain's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 514
Ltrain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Against 3 random hands we have an edge...

7,947,972 games 18.183 secs 437,110 games/sec

Board: 7d Jc 6d
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 28.7960 % 27.53% 01.27% { 8s5h }
Hand 2: 23.7427 % 22.61% 01.13% { random }
Hand 3: 23.7393 % 22.61% 01.13% { random }
Hand 4: 23.7220 % 22.60% 01.13% { random }
Man, you must have a quick computer because I am trying to get the number myself and it is really slow. I started with random, but removed the most obvious offsuit hands no one would play, and I am getting 26.4% with only about 3% completion. The number keeps falling slowly so I am guessing it will be about %25.

(First time trying this) Let's assume we get three callers to showdown at a cost of 5 sb with a 19.5 sb pot, (25%x19.5)-5= -.12 EV, Correct?
"Don't judge a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes. Then you are a mile away, and have his shoes." - Anon.
 
Reply With Quote
elipsesjeff
Old 10-11-2005, 11:00 PM #28 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
But if we lead into 3 or 4 opponents and 2 call did we push an edge?
I think so, the added folding equity gives us an edge as an aggressor with fewer opponents. With zero folding equity, however, you're really just increasing your variance, but the play itself isnt -EV, thats where pot/implied odds come in.


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 10-11-2005, 11:03 PM #29 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltrain
Man, you must have a quick computer because I am trying to get the number myself and it is really slow.
When the hand ranges are wide use Monte Caro mode and let it run a few seconds.
 
Reply With Quote
floppydonker
Old 10-16-2005, 02:58 AM #30 (permalink)  

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26
floppydonker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltrain
I check/fold on the first hand.
You would fold your st8 for one bet here? To me that is just sik and wrong.....
Reply With Quote
Ltrain
Old 10-16-2005, 03:33 AM #31 (permalink)  
Ltrain's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 514
Ltrain
Quote:
Originally Posted by floppydonker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltrain
I check/fold on the first hand.
You would fold your st8 for one bet here? To me that is just sik and wrong.....
The check/fold would have been on the flop when it was a draw.
"Don't judge a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes. Then you are a mile away, and have his shoes." - Anon.
 
Reply With Quote
floppydonker
Old 10-17-2005, 12:21 AM #32 (permalink)  

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26
floppydonker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltrain
Quote:
Originally Posted by floppydonker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ltrain
I check/fold on the first hand.
You would fold your st8 for one bet here? To me that is just sik and wrong.....
The check/fold would have been on the flop when it was a draw.
Oh, well that makes more sense.... But still I think I would see the turn for one bet with the draw, unless there were already 3 diamonds on the flop.... But thats just me.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2005, 09:29 AM #33 (permalink)  
Guest

Posts: n/a
Are you KIDDING ME??
On hand 1
the pot is 10SB by the time it gets to him
He has in partial outs 7 outs. Half the time or more all of his outs count. The rest of the time 6 outs count. There's runner-runner two pair/trips possibilities (two pair would blow though because of four to the straight). He has 30% equity in this pot AT LEAST. He's only paying 2 SB for his share of 3SB and superb implied odds IF his straight is clean. We would have to discount his implied odds for the bad outs, but they are not horrible in that case. Calling here gains you at least 2 SB on average including implied odds on clean straights. Folding here is as bad as laying down aces preflop.
Reply With Quote
Ltrain
Old 10-17-2005, 07:00 PM #34 (permalink)  
Ltrain's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 514
Ltrain
Quote:
Originally Posted by iopq
Are you KIDDING ME??
On hand 1
the pot is 10SB by the time it gets to him
He has in partial outs 7 outs. Half the time or more all of his outs count. The rest of the time 6 outs count. There's runner-runner two pair/trips possibilities (two pair would blow though because of four to the straight). He has 30% equity in this pot AT LEAST. He's only paying 2 SB for his share of 3SB and superb implied odds IF his straight is clean. We would have to discount his implied odds for the bad outs, but they are not horrible in that case. Calling here gains you at least 2 SB on average including implied odds on clean straights. Folding here is as bad as laying down aces preflop.
I think we are beating a dead horse, but we did the math for the flop in the prior posts; with some variance the play is slightly negative to slightly positive EV depending upon your assumptions of the hands being played by the 3 other players.

Wait, laying down Aces is bad?
"Don't judge a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes. Then you are a mile away, and have his shoes." - Anon.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.