|
wiesman02
|
05-09-2005, 08:15 PM
Post subject: Multi-tabling efficiency
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: cheshire, ct
Posts: 54
|
|
I have a question about multi-tabling. How do you guys efficiently multi-table more than 2 tables. I have found myself multi-tabling the 1/2- 3/6 games at Gamesgrid lately. I feel that I have no trouble multi-ing 2 tables but as soon as I get to 3, I start to become like a machine, since there's so much going on at once. I can't watch the other players at the table as closely with 3 or more tables.
I have some stats here.....very low sample, and you're all going to scream at me for this, but I think its somewhat important. What should I do here:
2 tabling 1/2-3/6 tables I'm up $225 in 12 hours of 2-tabling.
3 tabling 1/2- 3/6 tables I'm down $80 in 10 hours of 3-tabling.
(2 week sample)
Granted my flops weren't cooperating during those sessions, but seeing as though I'm making ~$18 / hr 2-tabling, should I just say to hell with 3-tabling for now ? or should I work on it so that I can get better and make even more per hour.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
First of all, by all the reports I've heard the Gamesgrid games are full of medicore players chasing the bonus. Not as many of the truely terrible players you'll find at other sites.
Second, your sample sizes are too small.
The way I've gotten a gague on this is just counting errors I've made that I would not have made playing only 1 table. Running 4 tables I make about 1 error per hour or two, although I'm getting better. When I throw in the 5th table I know that rate goes up. I really think it comes down to how many hands you can play at a time. I can run 2 pretty well, once a 3rd one comes up it gets hecktic and sometimes I'll lose track of the action.
|
|
|
|
Shark Bait
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 481
|
|
I can play 2 tables with almost no problem, but I find it nearly impossible to play 3 tables. Every once in a while I'll be in a hand on all 3 tables and they keep popping up asking me what I want to do and I haven't decided what to do before another one pops up. Then I make mistakes like I don't realize there's 4 to the flush on the board and he's raising...
So I stick to 2 tables or less. I play on UB though...I don't know what everyone else thinks, but I think the action at UB is pretty quick. Party poker is sooooo slooooow. I could probably manage 3-4 at party poker since everyone takes 20 seconds to decide what they want to do.
You guys see that pic of the guy 12 tabling with 4 LCD screens? That's just crazy.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shark Bait
|
Pacific Poker is a lot worse.
BTW, are you guys running at least 1600x1200? I can't run more than 2 tables without it.
|
|
|
|
wiesman02
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: cheshire, ct
Posts: 54
|
|
2-tabling i run at 1084 x 7-something . 3 or 4 tabling I have to run at 1600 x 1200 so that the 4 tables don't overlapp
|
|
|
|
Shark Bait
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 481
|
|
I use 1280x960 because it's the highest I can go before things start to get blurry on my 19" monitor.
With 2 or more tables, I don't try to make room for all of them, I just have them overlap.
also, what does everyone think of the miniview at UB? I can't stand it...just makes it harder for me to understand what's going on. But 4 tables would easily fit on 1 screen.
|
|
|
|
|~|ypermegachi
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: emo-kid
Posts: 3,580
|
|
prima's network has the best mini-view by far...
|
|
|
|
ArcticKnight
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: golf course
Posts: 416
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shark Bait
I play on UB though...I don't know what everyone else thinks, but I think the action at UB is pretty quick. .
|
Hi Shark Bait
General consensus is that UB is tough, and Party/Empire is much easier.
Having played both, I agree. If you are beating UB, you should do even better at Party (IMO). Especially of your are using PokerTracker.
Way easier to find loose players on Party.
|
|
Gone golfing ..see ya in the Fall of 2006
PS. What did the snail on the turtle's back say?
Wheeeeeeeee........
|
|
Legendash
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Crypto 6max 100NL
Posts: 611
|
|
I can 4 table party at 1360x1024, the refresh rate at 1600x1200 isn't good for me, i need a 2nd monitor. I think my VP$IP is about 17% so i don't usually have more than 2 hands to play at once, and party is indeed very slow sometimes, i don't see why the timelimit is so long, who needs 30s preflop to make a decision.
|
|
"[This theory] is only useful for helping to calculate your luck odds. If you have a good read that you have a numerical advantage against your opponent, that your hand is "luckier"..."
Copyright, Youngdro 2007.
|
|
Element187
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 802
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ArcticKnight
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shark Bait
I play on UB though...I don't know what everyone else thinks, but I think the action at UB is pretty quick. .
|
Hi Shark Bait
General consensus is that UB is tough, and Party/Empire is much easier.
Having played both, I agree. If you are beating UB, you should do even better at Party (IMO). Especially of your are using PokerTracker.
Way easier to find loose players on Party.
|
i was a UB player that switched to party poker... one thing that does take awhile to get used to is the frequency and intensity of bad beats... other then that its easy bling.
|
"Imagine how it would be to be at the top Making cash money, Go and tour all around the world, Tell stories about all the young girls." - The Prodigy - Girls
|
|
Shark Bait
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 481
|
|
I don't have the money for $0.50/$1 ...yet 
And I just took a nice $20 downswing at 25/50 cent so it's going to be a while.
And the rake's at party poker suck. UB is never more than 5%
|
|
|