Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Looking for leaks (PT stats after 27K hands)

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Gatlin Dan
Old 08-03-2005, 05:24 AM     Post subject: Looking for leaks (PT stats after 27K hands) #1 (permalink)  
Gatlin Dan's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
Gatlin Dan
I've been spending a lot of time in PT lately (almost as much time as I have spent playing recently). My game is getting better, but there's always room for more improvement.
What do you guys think of these?

If there is any other stats you want to know, ask and I will post them up. These are .5/1 hands.

I have been thinking a long time about moving up but am worried about not being able to beat the rake at higher limits like 2/4.

All comments, opinions, and criticism (related to these stats) greatly appreciated.

VP$IP 18.86
VP$SB 35.21
FSB2S 79.22
FBB2S 63.55
W$WSF 32.99
W2SD 36.25
W$SD 50.22
PFR 8.12
BB/100 5.09
AGG FACTOR:
F: 2.13
T: 2.34
R: 1.88
Total Agg Factor (post-flop) 2.13

Anything seem out of whack or striking here?

"A lot of fortunes are made on what you don't play."--"Miami" John Cernuto
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
poskid_1982
Old 08-03-2005, 09:55 AM #2 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 392
poskid_1982
I wouldnt worry too much about not being able to beat the rake at higher limits. Destroying the game at 5BB/100 is a good sign. I've found most 2/4 tables are plagued with weak tighties. If you have the BR I think you can and should move up.
Superb play sir...I always call 20% of my stack off with a gutshot draw. Excuse me while I race for my wallet.
 
Reply With Quote
Phyl
Old 08-03-2005, 09:59 AM #3 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 396
Phyl
Send a message via AIM to Phyl
You might want to work on upping your winrate more before you take on a rock solid game like the Party 2/4. Can never be too carefull.

Stats are good. Move the hell up!
Reply With Quote
TylerK
Old 08-03-2005, 01:29 PM #4 (permalink)  
TylerK's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME
Posts: 1,791
TylerK
Send a message via AIM to TylerK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phyl
You might want to work on upping your winrate more before you take on a rock solid game like the Party 2/4. Can never be too carefull.
TylerK: its just gambling if i want to worry about money i'll go to work lol
 
Reply With Quote
Bmxicle
Old 08-03-2005, 01:40 PM #5 (permalink)  
Bmxicle's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 947
Bmxicle
Send a message via AIM to Bmxicle
i don't appreciate that sarcasm, i almost beleived you as a NL player.
 
Reply With Quote
A'aag
Old 08-03-2005, 03:29 PM #6 (permalink)  
A'aag's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loyal son of Rochester
Posts: 172
A'aag
I think it's obvious you're ready to move up. It looks like you call down a lot (high WTSD, low W$SD) which will be less and less profitable the higher you move up. Your FBB is a bit high, but again, this is something that only matters as you move up more. Can't argue with that win rate. Unless you've been cashing out a lot, you must be bankrolled for at least 1/2 and probably 2/4 depending on how many BB you're comfortable with.

lol @ Phyl
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 08-03-2005, 05:02 PM #7 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Bigger games tend to be aggressive so I end up calling down more often.

I played 1k hands earlier this week and had a 14% PFR, lol...
 
Reply With Quote
A'aag
Old 08-03-2005, 05:46 PM #8 (permalink)  
A'aag's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loyal son of Rochester
Posts: 172
A'aag
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Bigger games tend to be aggressive so I end up calling down more often.
Good point, but 36% still seems high; maybe it's a product of people calling him down with marginal hands more...
Reply With Quote
Gatlin Dan
Old 08-03-2005, 07:34 PM #9 (permalink)  
Gatlin Dan's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
Gatlin Dan
Quote:
Originally Posted by A'aag
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Bigger games tend to be aggressive so I end up calling down more often.
Good point, but 36% still seems high; maybe it's a product of people calling him down with marginal hands more...
I think this is the case here. I've tried to play with the idea of moving up, especially lately. I know as the tables tighten up at higher levels, I will be taking hands farther.that seem to have little chance of winning at looser tables.

I've been working on playing more hands from the blinds as well. I lose an incredible amount of money from the blinds.

Anybody know what good stats from the blinds would be? I've been completing from the sb more and defending the bb more against raises as of late. I know I will find myself defending my blinds more after moving up and want to try to fine tune some things concerning blind play.

I think playing from the blinds is the biggest leak in my game right now.

I was bankrolled for 3/6 until I cashed out a good portion this morning. I'm still rolled for 2/4 but am a little weak tight concerning the idea of moving up.

"A lot of fortunes are made on what you don't play."--"Miami" John Cernuto
 
Reply With Quote
jmontis
Old 08-04-2005, 05:47 AM #10 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,296
jmontis
why move up? party 2-4 is not a tough game to beat if you have the roll for it.
take your ego out of the equation and judge the situation dispassionately
 
Reply With Quote
elipsesjeff
Old 08-04-2005, 07:17 AM #11 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmontis
why move up? party 2-4 is not a tough game to beat if you have the roll for it.
Rake effects you less and less the more you move up. Also, the higher you go the more money you can make.


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
TylerK
Old 08-04-2005, 11:28 AM #12 (permalink)  
TylerK's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME
Posts: 1,791
TylerK
Send a message via AIM to TylerK
Quote:
Originally Posted by elipsesjeff
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmontis
why move up? party 2-4 is not a tough game to beat if you have the roll for it.
Rake effects you less and less the more you move up. Also, the higher you go the more money you can make.
I'm pretty sure he meant why *not* move up.
TylerK: its just gambling if i want to worry about money i'll go to work lol
 
Reply With Quote
gutshot
Old 08-04-2005, 03:47 PM #13 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
Posts: 608
gutshot
Go to 2/4, do not pass go, do not collect $200.

The game is so damn similar to 1/2 that I have no doubt you can kill it. Sack up and do it.
-jay

"i think the biggest leak in my game is using 2nd level thinking against players who can't think on the first level." -Renton
 
Reply With Quote
Gatlin Dan
Old 08-04-2005, 11:23 PM #14 (permalink)  
Gatlin Dan's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
Gatlin Dan
Quote:
Originally Posted by gutshot
Go to 2/4, do not pass go, do not collect $200.

The game is so damn similar to 1/2 that I have no doubt you can kill it. Sack up and do it.
How are they similar?
My impression is that the rake structure and the tricky cuteness of the players at 1/2 make the game different than 2/4.

Am I too worried about the subtleties and losing sight of the obvious?

"A lot of fortunes are made on what you don't play."--"Miami" John Cernuto
 
Reply With Quote
gutshot
Old 08-06-2005, 05:16 PM #15 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
Posts: 608
gutshot
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatlin Dan
How are they similar?
My impression is that the rake structure and the tricky cuteness of the players at 1/2 make the game different than 2/4.

Am I too worried about the subtleties and losing sight of the obvious?
Yes.

The table textures that I run into at 2/4 remind me alot of 1/2. Couple(maybe) TAgs, several LPP, peppered with a gambler or taz. Isolating the taz players is fun and profitable. Just more money on the table and a little less rake exposure. Come on in, the water's fine.
-jay

"i think the biggest leak in my game is using 2nd level thinking against players who can't think on the first level." -Renton
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.