Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

how to compute equity vs a range?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
mdwav
Old 03-08-2006, 02:55 AM     Post subject: how to compute equity vs a range? #1 (permalink)  
mdwav's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ont, Canada
Posts: 59
mdwav
Send a message via MSN to mdwav
The title's kinda odd, but I can't figure out how to word it. Basically, I've started to play 2/4 6-max , and have a problem I have rarely had in full ring. What do you do with a hand that basically fits in the middle of someone's raising standards?
Eg P1 raises, his/her range is A8+, K9+, QJ/QT, pairs 44+. What do you do with something like KJs? KQ? 88? 99? AT? How much does your opponent's post-flop tendencies affect your decision? Eg your opponent won't fold Ace high UI, do you then start folding KQ?
" Don’t misunderstand. A pro isn’t someone who sacrifices himself for his job. That’s just a fool.” - Reno
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
elipsesjeff
Old 03-08-2006, 02:58 AM #2 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
All of these are a pretty standard 3 bet preflop. You can go even as low as 55 if you know how to play post flop.

If he won't fold Ace high, then value bet him to death when you know he's got an Ace but take your free cards/showdowns when you need them.

You'll find that the range you gave are the standard 2p2 poker types.


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
Xanadu
Old 03-08-2006, 03:20 PM #3 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: May 2005
Location: st. paul, MO
Posts: 966
Xanadu
In general, you want to 3-bet about the top half of the intitial raiser's range. This gives you a 75% chance of having the better hand on average. This of course should be adjusted for position/other opponents.
Reply With Quote
mdwav
Old 03-19-2006, 09:28 PM #4 (permalink)  
mdwav's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ont, Canada
Posts: 59
mdwav
Send a message via MSN to mdwav
Thnx for the replies. I've been busy with school so it's taken me awhile to get back here on the forums.

Quote:
All of these are a pretty standard 3 bet preflop
That's a fairly wide 3-betting range (IMO), esp the KJ (or maybe it's just my old full ring mentatility kicking in) . Are you 3-betting such a wide range for meta-game purposes? Folding equity? Or for value? And do you have the same standard as Xanadu (top 50% of intial raiser's hands)? Sorry for the pestering questions, just trying to figure out the reasoning rather than get a '3-betting chart'.

Quote:
You'll find that the range you gave are the standard 2p2 poker types.
That's kinda odd. I don't read a lot of 2p2, I just thought this was an appropriate raising range. So does that mean I think like a 2p2-er? Is that a good thing??

Quote:
In general, you want to 3-bet about the top half of the intitial raiser's range. This gives you a 75% chance of having the better hand on average.
Thnx Xanadu; where do you get these numbers from (top 1/2, 75%)?
" Don’t misunderstand. A pro isn’t someone who sacrifices himself for his job. That’s just a fool.” - Reno
 
Reply With Quote
Demiparadigm
Old 03-19-2006, 09:40 PM #5 (permalink)  
Demiparadigm's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Party 6 max
Posts: 1,602
Demiparadigm
A) I usually fold KJs, KQo to a raise, but i will 3 bet against a loose raiser. I will 3 bet 99 v anyone. The 3 bet is for value since you will have position for the rest of the hand. Hopefully, you play better than your opponents post flop.

B) 2p2 small stakes players are "typical TAggs" when we refer to the 2p2 poker type, it is a winning player. If you play like a winning player, as well as think like one, then yes, I guess that is a good thing.

C) this can be mathematically proven. You should actually raise closer t othe top 44% of your opponents raising range for value. Since 44% is pretty close to half, it is much easier to think of it as "half"

Finally download poker stove and play around a bit in there. Find out what the top 10% of hands are... the top 20% and 50%. This will give you a better idea of the hands that your opponents are playing, and what hands you should play back with. Also realize bad players are more likely to play any ace or any suited cards, despite their relative strength.
Also, use some type of HUD with poker tracker to get "quick reads" on your opponents. The more experience you get, the easier it is to put your opponent on a range. The more practice you get, the easier it is to determine the strength of your hand vs that range.


Good Luck.
To win in poker you only need to be one step ahead of your opponents. Two steps may be detrimental.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:08 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.