|
LawDude
|
11-25-2009, 08:40 PM
Post subject: great moments in misclicks
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
PokerStars Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
Preflop: Hero is MP2 with 8 , 3
1 fold, UTG+1 raises, 1 fold, Hero 3-bets, MP3 calls, 4 folds, UTG+1 caps, Hero calls, MP3 calls
Flop: (13.5 SB) 9 , 3 , 8 (3 players)
UTG+1 bets, Hero raises, 1 fold, UTG+1 calls
Turn: (8.75 BB) 4 (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets, UTG+1 calls
River: (10.75 BB) 5 (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets, UTG+1 calls
Total pot: $12.75 (12.75 BB) | Rake: $0.50
Results:
UTG+1 mucked K , K (one pair, Kings).
Hero had 8 , 3 (two pair, eights and threes).
Outcome: Hero won $12.25
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Muzzard
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,843
|
|
you misclicked twice
|
|
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
No, I am getting 12 to 1 on the call of the 4-bet and the implied odds are huge if I hit the flop. As long as I am willing to muck a pair of 8's or something, I am priced in for that call.
|
|
|
|
Muzzard
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,843
|
|
Not great implied if you only get 4 bets out of KK
|
|
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
I ended up getting 25 to 1. That's much better than my pre-flop equity.
|
|
|
|
Muzzard
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,843
|
|
you're my hero
|
|
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Muzzard
you're my hero
|
We had this discussion several days ago with respect to $10/$15 blind structures-- basically the issue is at what point are your pot odds pre-flop high enough that you can call with any 2 cards. It seems to me that in a capped pot, you don't even need as high pot odds because you have better implied odds.
Now, if you would like to make an argument or stove some ranges or something to establish why this is not so, I'd love to see it. But snark isn't analysis.
|
|
|
|
Muzzard
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,843
|
|
I'll just stick to snark. You're the LHE expert. Cool story bro.
|
|
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Muzzard
I'll just stick to snark. You're the LHE expert. Cool story bro.
|
I'm no expert. I'm often wrong. And that's the point. You can contribute a lot to this discussion by explaining why it is that you think I am wrong.
Or you can just be snarky and assist nobody, not me and not anyone else who might be reading this.
Your call.
|
|
|
|
Muzzard
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,843
|
|
cool story bro
|
|
|