Poker Forum
|
Over 1,246,000 Posts!
|
|
|
>
>
fun with implicit collusion
|
|
|
LawDude
|
06-17-2009, 08:14 PM
Post subject: fun with implicit collusion
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
8/16 1/2 kill at Commerce, table is a bunch of fishes. Only strong, tight player besides myself is in the HJ, just to my right. She's a tight-aggressive, a bit on the nitty side.
I have AcAh in the CO.
Everyone limps, I raise pre-flop, Button calls, SB 3-bets and BB caps (these guys have basically re-raised every raised pot pre-flop-- they love huge family pots). Everyone calls.
Flop is Ks8h2d
Checks to me, I bet, 5 players, including button, call.
Turn is 3s
Checks to me, I bet, 5 players, including button, call. HJ's call puts her all-in.
River is a 4s
I am not that afraid of this card, though it could make runner-runner flushes and straights. Checks to me, I bet.
Button raises. Uh oh. He's got me beat, right? He has to beat HJ to win the whole pot-- otherwise he's just playing for a small side pot with my one BB in it.
And there's really not much here I can beat with my aces. If button was playing small suited connectors, he could have 2 pair, a flush, or a straight. Maybe he hit his set. Maybe he rivered 2 pair with some trash hand like K4. It's one thing to call this raised with an improved hand, but it's really hard to call it with nothing but an overpair.
At any rate, that's what I figured.
Oh well, I folded. So did everyone else.
Button turned over ace-jack offsuit. He had nothing. HJ had KQ suited. Button's bluff won him exactly one big bet, $16. HJ took a gigantic pot with the 2nd best hand.
Did I blow this? Probably.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
KoRnholio
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,165
|
|
Pot is way too big to fold the nut pair here.
|
|
Some days it feels like I've been standing forever, waiting for the bank teller to return so I can cash in all these Sklansky Bucks.
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KoRnholio
Pot is way too big to fold the nut pair here.
|
Remember:
1. The "nut pair" is not that good a hand on this board in a multi-way pot (or, to put it another way, this is a highly unlikely bluff given that he has to get several people to fold AND hope the all-in player has nothing).
2. Since a good player is all-in, you may only be fighting for a small side pot anyway.
This doesn't mean I didn't screw up the hand-- I probably did; only that this is a lot different from your standard "crying call" situation. Indeed, it's a lot closer to "don't get married to aces", and if I screwed up, it has to be because of a particular reason why I needed to be married to THESE aces.
|
|
|
|
KoRnholio
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,165
|
|
I hate linking 2p2, but it is the only hit I got for my search. I think I first read the article that the op refers to later in his post, in the Cardplayer magazine archives.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/53...ilemma-241513/
"Someday you will make such a fold, it will be a good one and you will
be happy. You will be able to afford a shrimp cocktail at Binions with
the saved bet and maybe even treat a friend.
Feeling like a champ, you will do it again someday. But, this time a
guy with [K6] will drag your pot, buy the cocktail waitress a fur coat
and f*ck her blue for a week. Now which guy do you want to be? The
smart one with the shrimp cocktail or the stupid one with the sore
dick?"
I realize that LHE is a game of very small edges, and making 1BB folds on the river can have a substantial effect on your winrate. But there's always a non-zero chance of someone pulling that wtf-factor, non-nonsensical, hey-guys-look-I-bluffed-the-rounder-in-an-impossible-spot move that makes me pay it off in spots like this basically always. This is even more true live than online.
Not to mention that calling that last BB for a showdown is like tilt insurance against losing a 25BB pot to a total retard move. Put a value on each of those two things at 2.5% and now a call is +EV.
I see your point that in a protected pot with one all in player, that he should be bluffing this 0% of the time. But with all the voodoo logic that poor players use, it's possible that he thinks he has the HJ beat, but not you. He sees that big pot and a chance to steal it for 1BB and can't pass it up.
|
|
Some days it feels like I've been standing forever, waiting for the bank teller to return so I can cash in all these Sklansky Bucks.
|
|
BennyLaRue
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 646
|
|
Overpair, big pot and closing the action? Yep, it's a call.
But that's not why I'm posting. If HJ is going all-in during a juicy game, can she really be that good?
|
|
|
|
Chopper
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,255
|
|
no offense, lawdude, but i am laughing at two things....
1) HJ carrying less than a 10BB stack
2) folding for "one more" in a 20ish BB pot. you are good more than 5% of the time. folding and seeing AJ tilts the hell out of me here. (and, i've done it) but, it still makes me laugh. you know you are better than that.
"calling a bet on the river is at most a small mistake, but folding the best hand in a big pot is a colossal disaster." (i believe thats almost a direct quote of sklansky/miller) and, its what i try to live by.
however, just yesterday, i dropped KK in a pot where i was up against two stations and their Q7 and QJ going ballistic with their TPNK vs TPGK war. i was sure someone had a set or two pair. but, when i dropped to two bets cold on the turn (i led and it went raise, reraise), i about shit my pants when i saw that i was best and WOULD HAVE WON.
we all make these mistakes on occasion. dont sweat it too hard.
|
|
LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.
Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chopper
no offense, lawdude, but i am laughing at two things....
1) HJ carrying less than a 10BB stack
2) folding for "one more" in a 20ish BB pot. you are good more than 5% of the time. folding and seeing AJ tilts the hell out of me here. (and, i've done it) but, it still makes me laugh. you know you are better than that.
"calling a bet on the river is at most a small mistake, but folding the best hand in a big pot is a colossal disaster." (i believe thats almost a direct quote of sklansky/miller) and, its what i try to live by.
however, just yesterday, i dropped KK in a pot where i was up against two stations and their Q7 and QJ going ballistic with their TPNK vs TPGK war. i was sure someone had a set or two pair. but, when i dropped to two bets cold on the turn (i led and it went raise, reraise), i about shit my pants when i saw that i was best and WOULD HAVE WON.
we all make these mistakes on occasion. dont sweat it too hard.
|
Sklansky and Miller are great at what they do, but that statement about calling vs. folding is actually a VERY bad way to look at things.
The proper way to look at things is in terms of odds. If you are calling that bet, you have to consider first of all that HJ is all in. So you may not even be calling for a big pot. You may be calling to win 2BB's.
(BTW, it's not something I would recommend, but you'd be shocked at the amount of short-stacking at the card clubs. It isn't just a matter of low buys, but people wait until they are tapped out to rebuy.)
Second, even if we assume we have HJ beat, the pot odds on the bet are something like 19 to 1. That DOES NOT MEAN you should call every time. That means you should call if there is more than a 1 in 18 chance of a bluff. Sklansky and Miller surely know this-- they are obsessed with odds and statistics.
Further, let's remember that the hand we have is a pair of aces. That's it. We can't beat ANYTHING other than a bluff or an underpair. Flush? We lose. Straight? We lose. Set? We lose. 2 pair? We lose.
As I said, this doesn't mean I didn't play the hand wrong. But the argument you have to make is that in this situation, the probability of a bluff is more than 1 in 18. Otherwise, the call is -EV. And that's ASSUMING we have HJ beat. If we factor that in, I'd say you need assurances that the probability of a bluff is much higher than that.
And lest you think it doesn't matter because it costs so little to call-- you could make the same argument about limping 72o from the button pre-flop in a multi-way pot, couldn't you?
|
|
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KoRnholio
I hate linking 2p2, but it is the only hit I got for my search. I think I first read the article that the op refers to later in his post, in the Cardplayer magazine archives.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/53...ilemma-241513/
"Someday you will make such a fold, it will be a good one and you will
be happy. You will be able to afford a shrimp cocktail at Binions with
the saved bet and maybe even treat a friend.
Feeling like a champ, you will do it again someday. But, this time a
guy with [K6] will drag your pot, buy the cocktail waitress a fur coat
and f*ck her blue for a week. Now which guy do you want to be? The
smart one with the shrimp cocktail or the stupid one with the sore
dick?"
I realize that LHE is a game of very small edges, and making 1BB folds on the river can have a substantial effect on your winrate. But there's always a non-zero chance of someone pulling that wtf-factor, non-nonsensical, hey-guys-look-I-bluffed-the-rounder-in-an-impossible-spot move that makes me pay it off in spots like this basically always. This is even more true live than online.
Not to mention that calling that last BB for a showdown is like tilt insurance against losing a 25BB pot to a total retard move. Put a value on each of those two things at 2.5% and now a call is +EV.
I see your point that in a protected pot with one all in player, that he should be bluffing this 0% of the time. But with all the voodoo logic that poor players use, it's possible that he thinks he has the HJ beat, but not you. He sees that big pot and a chance to steal it for 1BB and can't pass it up.
|
This is a good reply. One thing to remember about this is that Button didn't go off with the cocktail waitress. He didn't even win money on the hand. He lost $40 on it.
|
|
|
|
Chopper
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,255
|
|
no. i wouldnt ever make the same argument for limping 72o OTB. there is so much hand to play still. if we limp behind a universal pot, we have only 7:1 with the blinds still to act. thats dumb with 72. i may in the SB with everyone in and a BB i have never, ever seen raise a hand. but, thats a maybe and its because i am getting 20:1 preflop. and, i am only looking for 2pr or trips and still wont like a lot of the flops with my position. but anywhoo... take into consideration that we limp OTB and the BB raises, we call along with everyone going "ah shit." the SB raises now, and we have to call yet again. we are now in a 3bet pot with 72o and we got 28ish:1 to see the flop. well, we have already made two mistakes, so if this scenario EVER presented itself (and we know it wouldnt), we are already in over our heads and have effectively spewed off 2 SBs.
point is: we have had this debate before about "being sure" vs "pot odds" on the river. and, while i agree that sometimes it's obvious, and i would be thinking the same here, i would still call here. the pot is just too big.
all that means is that i believe in that "rule" more than you do. you may trust your reads better than i do, but i let pot odds on the river determine a lot of what i call when i am "sure" i am behind.
one major determining factor, for me, was you saying that HJ is TAG but sort of nitty. this "read" tells me she has a pair, but nothing special, or a draw (but here the draw is unlikely because there is no way a nit calls this flop when they are going AI on the turn when there are no flopped draws imo). so, kind of put her on the K or a pp. but, she NEVER raised. so, she doesnt like her hand all that much. but, the fact that this only other "strong" player allowed herself to get put AI tells me our generic read isnt anything to worry about. she's more of a fish; i dont care what the usual shorting play is in this card room. anyone of any skill wont allow themselves to be put AI at a limit table....period. so, i am leaning more towards a weak TP station type of player now. and, we have that beat.
its the bluff from the side pot guy that has me most scared. so, i need 20:1 to beat him. and, i'm not sure an overpair will do that. i expect to get beat here almost every time. but, once in 20 will break even. and, i dont give up on huge pots unless i have a whiffed draw. if i have TP, i either dont allow it to get this bad, or i pay it off. i take the "small mistake" play here almost every time. but, as you have seen, i will still fold when i am "sure." but, how sure can i really be when i still miss my reads against bad players?? and, if HJ was the only other strong player, that means you dont respect this other guy that much, and that warrants a call to me.
(btw, i am not arguing with you. i think if we talked in person we would come to a conclusion that we both agree on pretty quickly.)
|
|
LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.
Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chopper
one major determining factor, for me, was you saying that HJ is TAG but sort of nitty. this "read" tells me she has a pair, but nothing special, or a draw (but here the draw is unlikely because there is no way a nit calls this flop when they are going AI on the turn when there are no flopped draws imo). so, kind of put her on the K or a pp. but, she NEVER raised. so, she doesnt like her hand all that much. but, the fact that this only other "strong" player allowed herself to get put AI tells me our generic read isnt anything to worry about. she's more of a fish; i dont care what the usual shorting play is in this card room. anyone of any skill wont allow themselves to be put AI at a limit table....period. so, i am leaning more towards a weak TP station type of player now. and, we have that beat.
|
This really is a live/online distinction.
I would agree with you that anyone who plays limit short-stack online is an almost automatic fish.
But live, rebuying is something more of an ordeal. Indeed, it's a little embarrassing. I do it-- I would never be caught dead at a limit table with a short stack-- but I can tell you that people look at you strangely if you still have some chips in front of you and you rebuy, or if you rebuy several times.
So you will find very good players in every technical respect at our card clubs who nonetheless, either because of the embarassment or the pain in the butt of calling for chips, will not rebuy when their stack gets low, only when they tap out.
It's just a weird thing that doesn't make sense as poker strategy but people do it anyway.
A nice comparison is there is a guy at Hollywood Park, a regular at the 15/30 table, who is an EXCELLENT technical player. I mean he is midway between tight and loose, changes up all the time, makes great reads, and is quite patient and won't get involved playing trash hands when he is card dead. But he also calls for new setups (i.e., a new deck of cards) whenever he is losing. In other words, he's a perfectly rational and good card player who nonetheless carries some strange superstition about changing the deck to change his luck. Can I explain this? No. But if someone looks at this guy doing it and assumes "oh, the guy's a fish", they are in for a huge surprise.
|
|
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Oh, and BTW Chopper, your 6:41 p.m. post makes the best argument possible for a call. It may be right. The reason I posted the hand is because I think with the all-in player and the bluff being essentially a play for a small side pot, plus the Hero having just an overpair, it presents a stickier situation than the normal "well I have to call this heads up" issue that we have discussed before.
|
|
|
|
Chopper
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,255
|
|
i think that calling for a deck change/dealer change is quite different than carrying a short stack when it comes to superstition. (and, i am just being a bitch here for the sake of debate.)
think about it, though, if you have a short stack, and bought in for a more "normal" amount, if you were superstitious, wouldnt you WANT to rebuy to change your luck?? why keep riding that stack down when you are card dead? change that shit up and get some of those lucky chips that they only keep behind the cage. lol.
online, i wont go below 12BBs. but, live, i routinely wait until i dip under 10 because the play is so passive the pots never require me to put in more than 6-7 BBs. but, i know what you are saying. however, the short stack loses respect, automatically, from me. mistake or not, i will adjust to it like you have, too.
but, i also play 3/6 live or maybe 4/8 if it spreads. i still assume the guy is a retard until i am proven otherwise multiple times.
at our casinos, you can buy 1000 in chips if you want for a 3/6 game. if you wanted to, you just put them in your lap and "come north" as you need it. you just dont "go south" with any without permission (which i have never even heard anyone ask). and, come north is my term because its the opposite of go south . our casinos will let you carry chips in your freakin' pocket if you so desire and put them on the table anytime BETWEEN hands. you just dont take them back off the table once you put them on the felt. ive done that a couple times.
sidebar: i have short-stacked 1/3 NL games for the hell of it before. i will put $80 on the table and carry another $160 in the pocket. i will bring up $80 per shot if i get stacked until i double back up. the goal for me was to double up and play deeper with someone else's money....all the while looking like a fish that got lucky. (this isnt recommended play, but when have i ever had solid advice??? lol.)
but, i also know that many players dont want to carry all that money in chips, either. they just put 10 BBs on the table to start and rebuy when they go bust. i laugh inside when they hit AA with a 3 BB stack and double up.
but whatevs. its just good to talk some poker again.
|
|
LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.
Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
|
|
Chopper
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,255
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LawDude
Oh, and BTW Chopper, your 6:41 p.m. post makes the best argument possible for a call. It may be right. The reason I posted the hand is because I think with the all-in player and the bluff being essentially a play for a small side pot, plus the Hero having just an overpair, it presents a stickier situation than the normal "well I have to call this heads up" issue that we have discussed before.
|
the only reason i am not saying, "take on the side pot player and be aggro to max your return" is because the pot was relatively big when the HJ went AI. and, the dipshit created the side pot in a big pot that had draws completed. its such a horrible spot to bluff that it almost works. but, we would all agree with how dumb it would be to ever try. what good does it do to fold hero off? you still have to beat the AI player......that called a lot of places. calling all those bets has Ahi beat every time.
and, it's easier to put the HJ on a hand when we know the results of hers and bluffy mcblufferson's.
i still think i play it the way i describe, and for those reasons, though. i just dont fold much on rivers.......because of the stakes i play.
|
|
LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.
Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chopper
i think that calling for a deck change/dealer change is quite different than carrying a short stack when it comes to superstition. (and, i am just being a bitch here for the sake of debate.)
think about it, though, if you have a short stack, and bought in for a more "normal" amount, if you were superstitious, wouldnt you WANT to rebuy to change your luck?? why keep riding that stack down when you are card dead? change that shit up and get some of those lucky chips that they only keep behind the cage. lol.
online, i wont go below 12BBs. but, live, i routinely wait until i dip under 10 because the play is so passive the pots never require me to put in more than 6-7 BBs. but, i know what you are saying. however, the short stack loses respect, automatically, from me. mistake or not, i will adjust to it like you have, too.
but, i also play 3/6 live or maybe 4/8 if it spreads. i still assume the guy is a retard until i am proven otherwise multiple times.
at our casinos, you can buy 1000 in chips if you want for a 3/6 game. if you wanted to, you just put them in your lap and "come north" as you need it. you just dont "go south" with any without permission (which i have never even heard anyone ask). and, come north is my term because its the opposite of go south  . our casinos will let you carry chips in your freakin' pocket if you so desire and put them on the table anytime BETWEEN hands. you just dont take them back off the table once you put them on the felt. ive done that a couple times.
sidebar: i have short-stacked 1/3 NL games for the hell of it before. i will put $80 on the table and carry another $160 in the pocket. i will bring up $80 per shot if i get stacked until i double back up. the goal for me was to double up and play deeper with someone else's money....all the while looking like a fish that got lucky. (this isnt recommended play, but when have i ever had solid advice??? lol.)
but, i also know that many players dont want to carry all that money in chips, either. they just put 10 BBs on the table to start and rebuy when they go bust. i laugh inside when they hit AA with a 3 BB stack and double up.
but whatevs. its just good to talk some poker again.
|
I have no problem with people buying $1000 for a 3-6 game if that's what people want to do, but believe it or not, you are going to get a lot of weird looks if you do it. You'd be surprised how much of an element of peer pressure there is in live poker. As I said, I keep my stack large enough to cover any reasonably foreseeable action that I might see in a hand, but many players (including some good ones) see that as weird.
One thing I will tell you-- don't try the "going north" move in any casino in California. Your chips have to be on the table (or, if cash is permitted, your cash has to be on the table) or in the hands of a chip runner and announced prior to the first card being dealt, or they don't play. So if you want to play 3-6 with $1,000 behind, you can buy 8 $100 chips and 2 racks of $1 chips, but the $100 chips have to stay on the table or they can't be used.
I actually played a little no limit last night-- 3/5, $200 buy-in. Basically the low buy-in forces everyone to play short-stacked, and that doesn't give you any room to make any post-flop plays. You see the flop and decide if you want to shove or not.
|
|
|
|
Chopper
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,255
|
|
Quote:
|
I actually played a little no limit last night-- 3/5, $200 buy-in. Basically the low buy-in forces everyone to play short-stacked, and that doesn't give you any room to make any post-flop plays. You see the flop and decide if you want to shove or not.
|
this is what levels the playing field a bit. there are no river decisions. there are less ways to put your opponent to really tough decisions for bigger money than they are comfortable with. therefore, shorting takes away the better player's edge.
its silly to do at the lowest levels, when WE should have the advantage, but at higher levels, i wouldnt bat an eye at it. the variance can be huge, though.
in my home games, the guys want to play 25/50c blinds and play NL. they want to buy in and rebuy for $5!! that is insane. but, i cant really stop them because they want the blinds to amount to something.....so, they minraise instead. its silly, but thats what they want to do.
so, i play short stacked, and aggressive, against them, too. i cant win more than the $5 in your stack even if i have $1000 on the table. so, i buy in for $10 and keep them covered. but, put them all in anytime i hit a flop with my premiums. and, i come over their raises a lot. i squeeze a lot. i dont really push a lot of draws, but i will push combos. just crap like that. basically, flop TPTK and bet size to get it in on the turn and roll the dice for the river.
crazy, but very, very profitable. the casinos can be about the same, but with a slightly higher caliber of player than my home games for sure. but, the goal, if shorting, is to take away the tough decisions on later streets by already having the money in the middle. and, if you are the deeper stack, your goal is to put the shorty to tough decisions, FOR HIS STACK, before he gets committed to the pot. they will fold quite often if you strike hard and first. they like to be the shover, not the shovee.
|
|
LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.
Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chopper
Quote:
|
I actually played a little no limit last night-- 3/5, $200 buy-in. Basically the low buy-in forces everyone to play short-stacked, and that doesn't give you any room to make any post-flop plays. You see the flop and decide if you want to shove or not.
|
this is what levels the playing field a bit. there are no river decisions. there are less ways to put your opponent to really tough decisions for bigger money than they are comfortable with. therefore, shorting takes away the better player's edge.
its silly to do at the lowest levels, when WE should have the advantage, but at higher levels, i wouldnt bat an eye at it. the variance can be huge, though.
in my home games, the guys want to play 25/50c blinds and play NL. they want to buy in and rebuy for $5!! that is insane. but, i cant really stop them because they want the blinds to amount to something.....so, they minraise instead. its silly, but thats what they want to do.
so, i play short stacked, and aggressive, against them, too. i cant win more than the $5 in your stack even if i have $1000 on the table. so, i buy in for $10 and keep them covered. but, put them all in anytime i hit a flop with my premiums. and, i come over their raises a lot. i squeeze a lot. i dont really push a lot of draws, but i will push combos. just crap like that. basically, flop TPTK and bet size to get it in on the turn and roll the dice for the river.
crazy, but very, very profitable. the casinos can be about the same, but with a slightly higher caliber of player than my home games for sure. but, the goal, if shorting, is to take away the tough decisions on later streets by already having the money in the middle. and, if you are the deeper stack, your goal is to put the shorty to tough decisions, FOR HIS STACK, before he gets committed to the pot. they will fold quite often if you strike hard and first. they like to be the shover, not the shovee.
|
Well, I didn't do so well with the no limit because I actually flopped two open-ended straight flush draws(!) with suited connectors in position. Both times, as you might imagine, I ended up all in, and both times, I got called-- one time by top pair and a straight draw (which was no good as I had a better straight draw) and one time by a made straight (that sucked). And of course, neither time did I draw out.
My best hand was when I got someone to lay down pocket kings (face up) when I had pocket 10's and represented an ace that hit the flop.
|
|
|
|
Latest Poker News
|
|
KoRnholio
|
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
|
|
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53 AM.
|