|
Gatlin Dan
|
12-19-2004, 10:18 PM
Post subject: Drawing to a flush...
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
|
|
Was this played ok?
PokerStars 0.05/0.10 Hold'em (9 handed) converter
Preflop: Hero is BB with 4 , 6 .
UTG calls, 2 folds, MP2 raises, 3 folds, SB calls, Hero calls, UTG calls.
Flop: (8 SB) T , 8 , Q (4 players)
SB bets, Hero raises, UTG folds, MP2 calls, SB calls.
Turn: (7 BB) 6 (3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, MP2 calls, SB calls.
River: (10 BB) J (3 players)
SB bets, Hero raises, MP2 folds, SB calls.
Final Pot: 14 BB
Results in white below:
SB has Qc Jh (two pair, queens and jacks).
Hero has 4d 6d (flush, queen high).
Outcome: Hero wins 14 BB.
Was this a good play or am I crazy and got lucky? Were my raises smart or stupid? Please give me feedback. Thanks.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
steviebrutal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 96
|
|
Im usually not comfortable drawing to anything but the nut flush (or K high) long handed. If you hit your diamond on the turn, if someone has a higher diamond than you - which is likely with 4 players going to the turn - they have 8 redraws to beat your hand. Its just a very vulnerable hand that shouldnt have been played in the first place.
Preflop wasnt THAT bad of a decision, but I wouldnt have played it - even from the BB. I understand this is microlimits - but thats no reason to lower your standards.
I am usually a strong supporter of aggressive action in all strong drawing situations - but you are very vulnerable here.
Edit: I like the fact that you dont get scared when you hold a strong hand. That can make you alot of money - but it can also cost you alot when its void of calculation.
|
|
|
|
Gatlin Dan
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
|
|
I played this hand from the big blind following Sklansky's recommendations from the pre-flop chart for loose games. (I was wary of playing it too, but figured he knows better than I). Against a raise, in the BB he recommends playing suited cards down to 5-3s. It's obviously one of those hands that can be only marginally profittable and only when played correctly from the big blind. That was my reasoning for even playing the hand.
I knew that if I made the hand on the turn that I would be vulnerable to redraws on the river. that was part of the reason for the raise on the on the flop. I wanted to push higher diamonds out. I have about a 1 in 3 chance of my flush coming in two cards. With the amount of coldcalling at these limits I figured this to be a raise for value assuming at least one of the two would call and the original better would also call.
I'm not sure what you are meaning by gutshot; The turn paired one of my cards. I did not bet the turn because of the pair. If I checked the turn, I would concede the initiative and likely give away I was on a draw and missed.
This is some of the thinking that helped me play the hand the way I did. In terms of EV, I don't think they were necessarily bad decisions, even though they were risky and I was indeed quite vulnerable.
|
|
|
|
steviebrutal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 96
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gatlin Dan
I played this hand from the big blind following Sklansky's recommendations from the pre-flop chart for loose games. (I was wary of playing it too, but figured he knows better than I). Against a raise, in the BB he recommends playing suited cards down to 5-3s. It's obviously one of those hands that can be only marginally profittable and only when played correctly from the big blind. That was my reasoning for even playing the hand.
I knew that if I made the hand on the turn that I would be vulnerable to redraws on the river. that was part of the reason for the raise on the on the flop. I wanted to push higher diamonds out. I have about a 1 in 3 chance of my flush coming in two cards. With the amount of coldcalling at these limits I figured this to be a raise for value assuming at least one of the two would call and the original better would also call.
I'm not sure what you are meaning by gutshot; The turn paired one of my cards. I did not bet the turn because of the pair. If I checked the turn, I would concede the initiative and likely give away I was on a draw and missed.
This is some of the thinking that helped me play the hand the way I did. In terms of EV, I don't think they were necessarily bad decisions, even though they were risky and I was indeed quite vulnerable.
|
Sklansky's charts shouldnt be used as a "bible", he says that himself. Not to mention (if youre referring to SSH) he models those examples/charts for loose-passive (somewhat aggressive) tables. At microlimits, I find it hard to believe that you dont have a table of people who arent willing to risk 10 or 20 more cents into any given pot.
I misread the hand reading through it too fast (about the gutshot). My apologies.
Youre right about the EV, but I dont think your edge was big enough that it was hurting you if you folded. I also have never played limits that low, so I could be completely off-base with alot of this.
I dont really think I have a problem with the way you played the hand overall, its just a hand I would have dumped PF. But it looks like you read the play right post-flop, which (to me anyways) is much more important than flawless pre-flop play.
|
|
|
|
elipsesjeff
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by steviebrutal
Im usually not comfortable drawing to anything but the nut flush (or K high) long handed. If you hit your diamond on the turn, if someone has a higher diamond than you - which is likely with 4 players going to the turn - they have 8 redraws to beat your hand. Its just a very vulnerable hand that shouldnt have been played in the first place.
Preflop wasnt THAT bad of a decision, but I wouldnt have played it - even from the BB. I understand this is microlimits - but thats no reason to lower your standards.
I am usually a strong supporter of aggressive action in all strong drawing situations - but you are very vulnerable here.
|
I'll start with post flop. Post flop you played this hand great, you jammed the pot with your flush draw and on the turn you picked up 5 more outs for a possible nut hand. Betting the turn was correct as you want to continue to build the pot with your increase in outs, trying to make MP2 fold, and the ability for the cheap showdown. This is how you want to play every flush draw, generally. If you had the Ace of diamonds you might not want to raise because it may reduce the field because you are in early position. But since you don't have the Ace, raise it up to get that Ace or King out of there for their redraws.
Moving on to Preflop. Sklansky does say that you should play hands in the BB that you normally would play on the button in loose games. The only problem I have with this hand is that this hand isnt a loose hand. There are only 3 callers beside yourself; the loose guide is generally for hands with >6 callers preflop. You need to follow the tight starting requirements in these short handed rounds even if typically it is very loose. However, you also can look at it like MP2 was trying to steal the blinds, in which case you made the right call.
At best, the preflop call is marginal, but you probably won't lose money on it at the level you are at. As you increase in limits, the suited connecter's value decrease. At these microlimits, you really have to have the flush, straight, or trips to take down a pot. Remember, the odds of you getting a flush when you hold two suited cards is approximately 6%, if your implied odds can win you more than that, then you should call.
Overall, I would focus on how you played post flop, which was great. Preflop, next time think about folding depending on your read of the player.
|
Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com
More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Pre-flop: Close, I like more action to make this call.
Flop: Just call, you don't have anything (like an Ace) to go with your flush draw and a QT8 board likely gave someone something. Suck in the others and let someone else lead.
Turn: Yeah, follow through with aggression.
River: Got lucky SB bet into you.
|
|
|
|
Gatlin Dan
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
|
|
I agree that this was a hand that would probably have been better suited with a little more action. It was a tough to decide whether or not to play the hand. The tables are notoriously loose, it is a true rarity that so few people entered the pot. You are right Sklanksy does say that if the table is loose but is tight for a particular hand, he recommends reverting to the tighter recommendations on the starting hands.
I have been using the starting hands not as a bible but as an aid to help me see hands that I might be able to play that I would without the help of them, likely fold. I find myself playing very tight and pretty much neglecting suited connectors (non_broadway) all together.
I appreciate the feedback. It can only make my game better. Thanks guys.
I will post the results above for any who are interested.
Fnord, yeah I was lucky he bet into me on the river. He was reallly pissed after pairing both cards to see such a low flush. Made a comment about a table full of fish and then left.
Now for the harsh reality queston. Given how I played the hand, did I suckout on him? I know I didn't make my hand untill the river, but was it a true fish suckout? It may not have been perfectly played, but was his "suck me dry" comment warranted?
It's not like I got my feelings hurt or anything, I just want an objective opinion. I'm sure if I would been in his shoes, I would have been thinking the exact thing he was; I would likely have been able to refrain from the tantrum. The way he carried on you would have that he lost 14BB at a 30-60 table.
|
|
|
|
LockLow34
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 266
|
|
You are right Sklanksy does say that if the table is loose but is tight for a particular hand, he recommends reverting to the tighter recommendations on the starting hands.
Sklansky's books are also geared for somewhat higher stakes (unless you mean SSH). Most low stakes pots are multiway, so drawing opportunities aren't bad situations to be in.
However, that being said it's unprofitable over the long run to draw from up front with a weak hand (like 46s). I prefer a hand like that on the button or in the CO for 1 or 2 small bets provided there are several callers before me. Up front you want hands that can be bet for their high-card value, like AQs or KJs, like that.
|
|
"How deep is the money?" - Fnord
|
|
Gatlin Dan
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
|
|
I am referring specifically to SSH.
I do recognize I was in far from optimal position to play a hand like this. If it were not for me already having money in the pot due to the blind I would not entertain the idea of playing the hand from any earlier than the CO. In this situation, the only place this hand could even possibly have been played profitably was from the blinds. Against the preflop raise, if I had been in the cutoff or on the button, I couldn't cold call with such a marginal hand.
|
|
|
|
LockLow34
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 266
|
|
Dan, just wanted to say you're doing great in asking so many questions. It really shows you want to improve your game and hopefully we're helping you a bit. 
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gatlin Dan
I am referring specifically to SSH.
|
That's the next book on my reading list.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gatlin Dan
I do recognize I was in far from optimal position to play a hand like this. If it were not for me already having money in the pot due to the blind
|
You need to re-gear your thinking a bit here. First, once money is in the pot it is the pot's, not yours. This includes money from posted blinds. So just because you've put in a small bet in the big blind doesn't mean you have to call a raise. You'll end up putting 1.5-3 more bets into the pot to chase 1 small bet. Not profitable, and you have to think long term profitablility.
Believe me, it took me a long time to figure out I was losing LOADS of chips playing marginal hands from the blinds. I had to really tighten up in the blinds, and I definitely think it helped me be able to hold my stack. Position, more than anything else, is what is important. A good player can really make you pay to draw to your flush - something you want to do rather cheaply.
My mantra at the poker table is simply this: don't get caught out of position with an inferior hand.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gatlin Dan
Against the preflop raise, if I had been in the cutoff or on the button, I couldn't cold call with such a marginal hand.
|
You could call if the raise was from EP and had several callers, but that's more of an implied odds thing since with a raise and several callers it likely means mostly big cards are out there. The flop could easily come something like 235 or 443 or something like that. But that's not really applicable to your question. And you can easily get rid of the hand if the flop isn't favorable.
|
|
"How deep is the money?" - Fnord
|
|
LockLow34
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 266
|
|
One other thing...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gatlin Dan
I would not entertain the idea of playing the hand from any earlier than the CO. In this situation, the only place this hand could even possibly have been played profitably was from the blinds.
|
Not if I'm staring across the table at you. 
Think of it this way. If you're on the button with 6 4 and the flop comes T 8 Q and the big blind bets out and there are 2 callers. Now you know you're getting great odds on your money so you can call.
Turn comes 6 and big blind bets out again, this time 1 other person calls. River is J and big blind bets one more time, folded to you and you raise. Big blind pays you off with AQ.
This pot would be 14.5 big bets. Nice pot. You paid 4.5 bets getting the best of it to win 14.5 bets.
Say the river is J now you can throw your hand away easily, saving a bet.
This pot is only 9 bets and you only paid 2.5 bets. That's a huge difference.
You're a favorite to make your flush 1 in 3 times after the flop, so assuming you pay 2.5 bets the times it doesn't hit, that's 5 bets you put in when it doesn't hit. But when it does hit you're putting in 4.5 bets to win 14.5. 4.5+5 = 9.5, so overall in these situations you're profiting 5 bets.
Now conversely, you're in the blind having called the PFR, knowing you have worse cards than whatever the raiser had.
Flop comes the same, raiser bets and 2 callers, now you can call as well, but you can't be sure someone isn't drawing to a larger flush.
turn comes and raiser bets out again, 1 caller, you overcall.
river is the flush card. You bet out and it's folded around. You put 3.5 bets to win 10.5 bets. Not as good as 4.5 to win 14.5 is it?
So what happens if you bet out and get raised by the other caller? You have to pay him off at that point. (I think this happens about 10% of the time in flushes.) So you put 4.5 bets into a pot when you were drawing dead.
Add that to the times the flush doesn't come and the situation is really quite quite marginally profitable, if at all. And it's all because you put in that extra small bet before the flop. Better to just fold that out.
|
|
"How deep is the money?" - Fnord
|
|
Gatlin Dan
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LockLow34
Add that to the times the flush doesn't come and the situation is really quite quite marginally profitable, if at all. And it's all because you put in that extra small bet before the flop. Better to just fold that out.
|
you make some very good points. The reason I felt I should put in the extra bet preflop is again from what I had read in SSH. The advice said anytime you put money in the pot and someone raises behind you, you should call the extra bet, as long as it is only one, even if you don't like it. I know I didn't voluntarily put the first bet in the pot but it was in there none the less. This may be an incorrect intepretation of the text and it may not apply to blind play, but from my interpretation of the text, but I thought that this was what I should have done.
|
|
|
|
elipsesjeff
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LockLow34
You need to re-gear your thinking a bit here. First, once money is in the pot it is the pot's, not yours. This includes money from posted blinds. So just because you've put in a small bet in the big blind doesn't mean you have to call a raise. You'll end up putting 1.5-3 more bets into the pot to chase 1 small bet. Not profitable, and you have to think long term profitablility.
Believe me, it took me a long time to figure out I was losing LOADS of chips playing marginal hands from the blinds. I had to really tighten up in the blinds, and I definitely think it helped me be able to hold my stack. Position, more than anything else, is what is important. A good player can really make you pay to draw to your flush - something you want to do rather cheaply.
|
Not necessarily LockLow. If you limped in UTG and were raised, you should call that raise as long as its one bet back to you. If its two bets back to you, you should probably fold.
The blinds are a different story, if you hold complete trash dont bother calling the raise, only call a raise in the BB with cards you would play on the button. In this case, he would have played this hand on the button, but only if there were more callers.
|
Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com
More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
|
|
LockLow34
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 266
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by elipsesjeff
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LockLow34
You need to re-gear your thinking a bit here. First, once money is in the pot it is the pot's, not yours. This includes money from posted blinds. So just because you've put in a small bet in the big blind doesn't mean you have to call a raise. You'll end up putting 1.5-3 more bets into the pot to chase 1 small bet. Not profitable, and you have to think long term profitablility.
Believe me, it took me a long time to figure out I was losing LOADS of chips playing marginal hands from the blinds. I had to really tighten up in the blinds, and I definitely think it helped me be able to hold my stack. Position, more than anything else, is what is important. A good player can really make you pay to draw to your flush - something you want to do rather cheaply.
|
Not necessarily LockLow. If you limped in UTG and were raised, you should call that raise as long as its one bet back to you. If its two bets back to you, you should probably fold.
|
Depends on what you limped with. JTs, yes, but AKs or AQs no, I'd probably cap at that point, especially if I could isolate the initial raiser. If he calls 2 cold I know he's got a good one. I'd never limp UTG with 64s though.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by elipsesjeff
The blinds are a different story, if you hold complete trash dont bother calling the raise, only call a raise in the BB with cards you would play on the button. In this case, he would have played this hand on the button, but only if there were more callers.
|
I'm still not convinced playing a hand like 64s from the big blind is a profitable situation though. I would call with something like J9o or better, maybe suited connectors down to T8s. Then again if it's a family pot you HAVE to call, since the implied odds are so great if you flop a str8 or trips or something.
Maybe play in the blinds deserves its own thread?
|
|
"How deep is the money?" - Fnord
|
|
Gatlin Dan
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
|
|
[quote="elipsesjeff
Not necessarily LockLow. If you limped in UTG and were raised, you should call that raise as long as its one bet back to you. If its two bets back to you, you should probably fold.
The blinds are a different story, if you hold complete trash dont bother calling the raise, only call a raise in the BB with cards you would play on the button. In this case, he would have played this hand on the button, but only if there were more callers.[/quote]
Because I would play hand from the blind I would play in late position, and because it wasn't total trash, would this call be a good call using this rationale?
|
|
|
|
LockLow34
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 266
|
|
[quote=Gatlin Dan]
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by "elipsesjeff
Not necessarily LockLow. If you limped in UTG and were raised, you should call that raise as long as its one bet back to you. If its two bets back to you, you should probably fold.
The blinds are a different story, if you hold complete trash dont bother calling the raise, only call a raise in the BB with cards you would play on the button. In this case, he would have played this hand on the button, but only if there were more callers.[/quote
Because I would play hand from the blind I would play in late position, and because it wasn't total trash, would this call be a good call using this rationale?
|
The great thing about poker, you're going to find, is that there are different ideas about how and what to play. There's no cold, formulaic method to playing any form of poker - it's as much an art as a science.
|
|
"How deep is the money?" - Fnord
|
|
Gatlin Dan
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
|
|
yes, this is likely one of hands that there are as many ways to play it as there are people who play it.
Limit being more science than art, as opposed to NL which is the opposite, I think calling preflop was most likely correct.
|
|
|
|
elipsesjeff
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LockLow34
Depends on what you limped with. JTs, yes, but AKs or AQs no, I'd probably cap at that point, especially if I could isolate the initial raiser. If he calls 2 cold I know he's got a good one. I'd never limp UTG with 64s though.
I'm still not convinced playing a hand like 64s from the big blind is a profitable situation though. I would call with something like J9o or better, maybe suited connectors down to T8s. Then again if it's a family pot you HAVE to call, since the implied odds are so great if you flop a str8 or trips or something.
Maybe play in the blinds deserves its own thread?
|
Why would you ever limp with AKs or AQs from UTG? A limp-reraise should be used with AA or KK, and only sparingly, if thats what you are referring to. And you're not going to limp UTG with anything but marginal hands to begin with. Cold-calling two bets doesnt mean a strong hand, just a marginal hand that was trapped between two raisors. I've seen people cold-call two bets with A9s....anything but a strong hand.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LockLaw34
I'm still not convinced playing a hand like 64s from the big blind is a profitable situation though. I would call with something like J9o or better, maybe suited connectors down to T8s. Then again if it's a family pot you HAVE to call, since the implied odds are so great if you flop a str8 or trips or something.
|
Hands like 64s can be profitable if enough people play the hand and in the right position. The BB is like being on the Button in that you get last to act Preflop. Calling with J9o is less profitable than a suited connector because its not suited. You should generaly fold J9o because its not suited and it doesnt have high card power. SSH gives criteria on what optimal hands should be played, they are: High card power (AK), Suitedness, and connectiveness. You need to have two of these three atributes in order to have a playable hand. Thus, J9o is not a playable hand because it is only connective, but has no High Card Power or suitedness, but 64s is because it is connective and suited.
|
Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com
More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
|
|
elipsesjeff
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gatlin Dan
I think calling preflop was most likely correct.
|
IF you made a mistake in this hand, it would be calling preflop. I've defended your post flop behavior but you need to have more players in this hand to play 64s in the BB from a raise. Unless it was a blind steal, or you were in the small blind not facing a raise, you shouldn't call this hand.
Just because their suited connectors and they are cheap to play, doesn't mean you should always play them.
|
Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com
More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gatlin Dan
Now for the harsh reality queston. Given how I played the hand, did I suckout on him? I know I didn't make my hand untill the river, but was it a true fish suckout? It may not have been perfectly played, but was his "suck me dry" comment warranted?
|
Yeah, you're a horrible player. Betting/raising without a made hand, who does that?!?! You should appologise to him for sucking out on him by hitting your 9 outer and extracting the max for it. He really should hang around so he can take back some of his money from fish like you. *chuckle*
|
|
|
|
Gatlin Dan
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wild Bill's Backyard
Posts: 504
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gatlin Dan
Now for the harsh reality queston. Given how I played the hand, did I suckout on him? I know I didn't make my hand untill the river, but was it a true fish suckout? It may not have been perfectly played, but was his "suck me dry" comment warranted?
|
Yeah, you're a horrible player. Betting/raising without a made hand, who does that?!?! *
|
I guess I do.
Thanks guys for all your input on this. It has been very helpful and has really made me think about how I play suited connectors and how I play from the blinds.
I think a playing from the blinds forum (or thread) would be a good idea. I don't think I'm the only out there who makes questionable plays from them. I know hands can be played profitably from the blinds that would not normally be, but knowing what to play from the sb and from the bb against a raise are things that could probably lead to much significant and meaningful discussion.
|
|
|
|
elipsesjeff
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gatlin Dan
I think a playing from the blinds forum (or thread) would be a good idea. I don't think I'm the only out there who makes questionable plays from them. I know hands can be played profitably from the blinds that would not normally be, but knowing what to play from the sb and from the bb against a raise are things that could probably lead to much significant and meaningful discussion.
|
There is info out there if you are willing to do a search on it. If we have a forum on the blinds we might as well have on EP, MP, the Button, etc.
There is plenty of info out there especially on this forum. You should ask more specific questions and you will get better answers.
|
Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com
More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
|