|
asdpikas
|
09-16-2008, 03:12 AM
Post subject: draw equity?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,056
|
|
I think i played this the best i could, any comments?? should i 3bet the turn? I'm pretty sure there is a set out there, but have OESD and 2nd nut FD
2/4 Limit Holdem
6 players
Converted at weaktight.com
Stacks:
UTG ($137.50)
UTG 1 ($89.00)
CO ($123.50)
BTN ($53.00)
SB ($152.00)
Hero ($98.50)
Pre-flop: (1.5 SB, 6 players) Hero is BB
1 fold, UTG 1 raises, 2 folds, SB calls, Hero calls
Flop: (6.0 SB, 3 players)
SB bets, Hero calls, UTG 1 raises, SB calls, Hero 3-bets, UTG 1 calls, SB 4-bets, Hero calls, UTG 1 calls
Turn: (9.0 BB, 3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, UTG 1 raises, SB calls, Hero calls
River: (15.0 BB, 3 players)
SB checks, Hero checks, UTG 1 bets, SB raises, Hero folds, UTG 1 3-bets, SB calls
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Over-played.
|
|
|
|
asdpikas
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,056
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Over-played.
|
please elaborate... thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first of all, on the flop your equity is crushed by the flush draw so might as well not raise because you can make your straight and lose to a flush so your equity is not that great to begin with
the flush comes on the turn and you're like I still have a draw and I'm going to pay out of my ass to chase it...
I'd call two on the flop and check/call the turn
|
|
|
|
KoRnholio
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,165
|
|
"Epic spew" is what first came to mind for me on the flop play. On the flop with the 2 flush on board, I'd say our draw is worth about 8 outs (7 for the straight, 1 for the runner runner flush) against 2 opponents.
Our position isn't good enough to be able to take a free river card, and equity isn't that great, so raising is likely a losing proposition.
|
|
Some days it feels like I've been standing forever, waiting for the bank teller to return so I can cash in all these Sklansky Bucks.
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
What they said. It's a draw heavy board with a couple big cards. Flush Draw >>>>>>> Straight draw.
The 3-bet is pure spew.
|
|
|
|
DrivingDog
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 923
|
|
On the flop you've got a 3way pot with not quite your share of equity. You definitely don't want to knock anyone out so no point in 3 betting.
There's no draw strong enough to voluntary put chips in when it's a multiway pot on the turn. You're trying to get to the river cheap. C/c please.
|
|
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on." (George Bush).
|
|
Chopper
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,255
|
|
at first, i thought 3bet was spewy, too. but, i am trying to learn by looking at all angles. so, indulge me if possible...
we have 8 outs, maybe another for runner-runner. 8 outs = 32ish % chance of best hand. granted villains have likely redraws, but 32% in a 3way is breakeven, yes?
is there enough dead money + aggression so far to make such a draw pay off? how do i calculate that in a LHE table since i cant assume we may "stack off."
obv, i think c/c is the way to go, but i want to find the subtle situations where aggression w/o the best hand is correct.
|
|
LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.
Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
|
|
asdpikas
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,056
|
|
i think taking the aggro route with draws is never too big a mistake, and this case is no exception, and can be optimal some times.
I'm not saying i played it the best way, but having my 33% equity and adding a bit of fold equity is always good. If i can get Ahigh to fold on the turn and get it heads up with all that extra money in a big pot, i'm a happy camper.
In retrospect, this maybe wasnt the best time to play so aggro, but i don't think its soooooo awful
|
|
"could I take out every woman and child in a border town?"
For the right to be governed, waste them without mercy.
When you've decided. Meet me at the airport.
|
|
|
|
|
|
33% equity my ass
you have 26% against a flush draw and a pair
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
903 games 0.015 secs 60,200 games/sec
Board: Qc 8s Js
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 26.357% 26.36% 00.00% 238 0.00 { KsTc }
Hand 1: 32.890% 32.89% 00.00% 297 0.00 { 7s6s }
Hand 2: 40.753% 40.75% 00.00% 368 0.00 { AcJc }
---
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
...and no one is folding shit on this board.
Aggression is good and all, but not all hands are best played aggressivly.
|
|
|
|
KoRnholio
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,165
|
|
SB's cold call and then 4bet is also a very bad sign for our hand. It's possible he is doing this on a flush draw, but sets and the flopped straight will show up fairly often.
|
|
Some days it feels like I've been standing forever, waiting for the bank teller to return so I can cash in all these Sklansky Bucks.
|
|
Chopper
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,255
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by iopq
33% equity my ass
you have 26% against a flush draw and a pair
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
903 games 0.015 secs 60,200 games/sec
Board: Qc 8s Js
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 26.357% 26.36% 00.00% 238 0.00 { KsTc }
Hand 1: 32.890% 32.89% 00.00% 297 0.00 { 7s6s }
Hand 2: 40.753% 40.75% 00.00% 368 0.00 { AcJc }
---
|
i understand what you are saying, but your range is way too tight. villains could have more than you stoved. asp's equity is likely between 33 and 26. besides, 26% may still be profitable (prolly not, but it may be closer than we are giving credit) if we have FE + dead money....thats what i am trying to find out. (i'm still not saying the 3bet was right. i just want to see more than a "single hand range."
|
|
LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.
Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's no fold equity when someone caps the flop. Here, I'll stove another scenario where you could be crushed:
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
903 games 0.005 secs 180,600 games/sec
Board: Qc 8s Js
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 14.784% 14.29% 00.50% 129 4.50 { KsTc }
Hand 1: 30.731% 30.23% 00.50% 273 4.50 { AsTs }
Hand 2: 54.485% 54.49% 00.00% 492 0.00 { 8c8d }
---
so depending on the opponent's holdings you could be as bad as 14%
903 games 0.005 secs 180,600 games/sec
Board: Qc 8s Js
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 13.953% 13.95% 00.00% 126 0.00 { KsTc }
Hand 1: 34.441% 34.11% 00.33% 308 3.00 { As2s }
Hand 2: 51.606% 51.27% 00.33% 463 3.00 { AcAh }
actually lowest I got was 11.7% equity in pokerstove
but the best scenario is like:
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
903 games 0.005 secs 180,600 games/sec
Board: Qc 8s Js
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 40.532% 40.53% 00.00% 366 0.00 { KsTc }
Hand 1: 50.277% 50.28% 00.00% 454 0.00 { Qh2d }
Hand 2: 09.192% 09.19% 00.00% 83 0.00 { AdJh }
but that's less likely with the action given
|
|
|
|
DrivingDog
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 923
|
|
If you gain 20% FE by playing your draw aggressively against one player that's one thing but if you gain 20% FE against each of two players they'll both fold only 4% of the time.
Moral of the story: Don't pump your draws on the turn in multiway pots, especially big pots with heavy flop action.
|
|
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on." (George Bush).
|
|
asdpikas
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,056
|
|
hmmm
iopq, when doing that sort of calculation, you should consider ranges as a whole and not only bestcase/worstcase scenarios.
I would consider ranges as follows:
UTG:
A9+, A8s+, 55+, KQ, KJ, QJs, JTs, KTs
SB:
22-99, 89s+, A2s-A9s, A9+, KQ, KJ, QJs, JTs, K9s+
standard range for utg, wide speculative range for SB
Board: Qc 8s Js
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 31.281% 29.74% 01.54% 5762138 299017.00 { KsTc }
Hand 1: 39.480% 37.81% 01.67% 7325606 324214.50 { 55+, A8s+, KTs+, QJs, JTs, A9o+, KJo+ }
Hand 2: 29.239% 27.09% 02.15% 5248280 417318.50 { 99-22, A9s-A2s, K9s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T8s+, 98s, A9o+, KTo+, QJo }
|
|
"could I take out every woman and child in a border town?"
For the right to be governed, waste them without mercy.
When you've decided. Meet me at the airport.
|
|
asdpikas
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,056
|
|
thus, with 31.2% equity in a 3way pot, you just need 3.2% folding equity on the flop to make it worth it
Of course, if villains have exactly ATs and 88, i am crushed, but that is not the point, since we cannot know their cards, only speculate on ranges. And the ranges i have used are kind of tight, normally u should always include the possibility of villains having some weirdo hands.
I find it isn't black and white as you would have it, iopq
|
|
"could I take out every woman and child in a border town?"
For the right to be governed, waste them without mercy.
When you've decided. Meet me at the airport.
|
|
Chopper
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,255
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by asdpikas
hmmm
iopq, when doing that sort of calculation, you should consider ranges as a whole and not only bestcase/worstcase scenarios.
I would consider ranges as follows:
UTG:
A9+, A8s+, 55+, KQ, KJ, QJs, JTs, KTs
SB:
22-99, 89s+, A2s-A9s, A9+, KQ, KJ, QJs, JTs, K9s+
standard range for utg, wide speculative range for SB
Board: Qc 8s Js
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 31.281% 29.74% 01.54% 5762138 299017.00 { KsTc }
Hand 1: 39.480% 37.81% 01.67% 7325606 324214.50 { 55+, A8s+, KTs+, QJs, JTs, A9o+, KJo+ }
Hand 2: 29.239% 27.09% 02.15% 5248280 417318.50 { 99-22, A9s-A2s, K9s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T8s+, 98s, A9o+, KTo+, QJo }
|
thank you. i was just getting ready to do the same thing.
however, as i mentioned, i think its spew to 3bet the flop. i just wanted to see if there was reason for doing it that even made it close. here's what my reasoning, unmathematical as it is, came up with...
- UTG1's raise alone should tell us we have next to zero FE in a limit game, let alone the caller. so, that part adds zero equity to our hand if we 3bet.
- 9 sb's go in on the flop alone. the pot was 6 sb's before any flop betting. but, i still dont think that 6 sb's is enough "dead money" to pump even 30% equity to 32%...and that doesnt consider the spade draw that may make/sink our hand simultaneously. i just cant do the math to prove how close it is or isnt. that was what i wanted to see/learn.
bottom line is: we dont have enough other factors to make this play profitable w/o hitting ONLY a straight that doesnt give off a flush, especially given the action we are getting. maybe if we possibly had the current best hand and a redraw to a stronger hand....obv not the case here.
|
|
LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.
Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
|