|
koolmoe
|
11-12-2004, 12:27 AM
Post subject: Defending your blinds in shorthanded limit
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Drowning in prosperity
Posts: 1,279
|
|
So today I'm playing 3/6 at Absolute when the table starts to break up and gets down to 3 players. I don't usually play that shorthanded, but I was multitabling and autoposted my blind.
The button folds, SB raises, and I call holding 89o, figuring he could be attempting a steal, and I'm getting 3:1 on my call.
The flop comes 399 rainbow. SB bets, I call.
Turn is an A, the second spade. He bets, I raise, he calls.
River is a non-spade Q. He checks, I bet, he raises, I reraise, he thinks and calls. I show my trips, he mucks and says, "lovely." I say "half price," and he says "Any two for half price, huh?"
Was my call too loose? I'm sure I wouldn't have called on a full table, but it seems like you have to make more of an effort to defend your blinds shorthanded.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
AJ
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 29
|
|
Absolutely. Hell, I might have reraised with 89o (just kidding). Heads up is a different animal and your call here was correct.
|
|
Who said dogs can't play poker?
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
89 isn't a bad starting hand with just one other player in. Depends on the raise, and I certainly have folded it more than I've played it, but it's not a terrible hand. Assuming he doesn't have you dominated with a high pair (and I think you made the right read here, that he was stealing, probably with high cards), you're probably at least a 33% winner against almost any hand he could have. Against even AK suited, you win 33%.
|
|
|
|
Tenny
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 87
|
|
I would have called that as well.
|
|
-It seemed like a good idea at the time-
|