Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

For all you 6-max limit winners out there i have a question.

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Ragnar4
Old 06-09-2007, 10:38 PM     Post subject: For all you 6-max limit winners out there i have a question. #1 (permalink)  
Ragnar4's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 1,284
Ragnar4 will become famous soon enoughRagnar4 will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to Ragnar4
What should my Poker Tracker numbers look like?

VP$iP?
VP$ip SB?
Fold sb to steal?
fold bb to steal?
att to steal blinds?
Won money WSF%
Went to SD%
Won at SD%
Aggression?

thank you.
The older I get, the more I start wondering; Just what in the hell is going on here?
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Stagemn
Old 06-10-2007, 05:43 PM     Post subject: Re: For all you 6-max limit winners out there i have a quest #2 (permalink)  
Stagemn's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 195
Stagemn
I don't have good answres for this but here's some of my data with a consistent winning rate.

VP$iP: I run @ 28% myself - but I play well post-flop.
VP$ip SB: I run @30% w/ 28% PFR (mostly steal attempts).
Fold sb to steal: 70% I don't like defending the SB mostly.
fold bb to steal: 61% But I will defend my BB on occassion.
att to steal blinds? 60% for myself - maybe a bit too high.
Won money WSF%: 45%
Went to SD%: 36%
Won at SD%: 53%
Aggression: @ 2 accross the board is optimum. I average post-flop 2.25.


ADD BB/100: Between 1-5 is good. I'm running @3.1 over a small sample size though.

Would love feedback on others on my numbers above though.
Reply With Quote
bigspenda73
Old 06-10-2007, 05:54 PM #3 (permalink)  
bigspenda73's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
bigspenda73 will become famous soon enoughbigspenda73 will become famous soon enough
I run 25/20 and pretty darn aggressive. I lost all of my old PT database.

Just dont run like I did last session with 48% WTSD and 28% won money at showdown, that wouldn't be good for your roll.
Reply With Quote
SHAKE
Old 06-10-2007, 10:01 PM     Post subject: Re: For all you 6-max limit winners out there i have a quest #4 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 278
SHAKE
Nice 28vpip. I think you defen you SB to much though, also you WWSF is very high, normally like 33-36 attempt is nuts man. Maby 40% tops, 33-36 reall. In poker tracker use the filter and click "chnce to steal and raised" look at you bb/100/hand If you multiply this number by 100, it should be at least double your "PTBB/100". Ive seen the best BB/100 at

VP25.50
PFR 17.0 <--(should be your VPIP x 0.66)
AGR 3.5 2.5 2.0
WTS 34.00 (between 33 and 36 is right)
W$@S anything over 50 is good but if your 60% W$@S check you WTS odds are its low.
WWSF-any thing over 30 is good 33-36 opt. AGin if its very high check your showdown stats Could also mean you dont limp enough.




VP$iP: I run @ 28% myself - but I play well post-flop.
VP$ip SB: I run @30% w/ 28% PFR (mostly steal attempts).
Fold sb to steal: 70% I don't like defending the SB mostly.
fold bb to steal: 61% But I will defend my BB on occassion.
att to steal blinds? 60% for myself - maybe a bit too high.
Won money WSF%: 45%
Went to SD%: 36%
Won at SD%: 53%
Aggression: @ 2 accross the board is optimum. I average post-flop 2.25.


ADD BB/100: Between 1-5 is good. I'm running @3.1 over a small sample size though.

Would love feedback on others on my numbers above though.[/quote]


also check your %VPIP in blinds, if your defending more then 30% its too much Just use filter Position (anyblind)
Reply With Quote
Chopper
Old 06-11-2007, 02:37 AM #5 (permalink)  
Chopper's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,255
Chopper
from what i've read, you need to determine YOUR OWN NATURAL STYLE.

if you are a bit nitty, 20/10/2 (vpip/pfr/AF).

i, however, like to see a few more hands, i run 24/15/3.

however, i've read ideal river numbers are...w$wsf 30-35, w$sd 50-60. and your WtSD number should be in the lower 20's.

bottom line is when you establish your own personal vpip/pfr/AF numbers, you will start to be better at pinning your opponents on ranges based on what you would play and whether your opponent is looser/tighter than you. that alone will make you a better reader of hands...so long as you are a profitable player.

oh, and as for win rate...euphorism (i think) will tell you that you just cannot run over a 2 for 100k hands, mathematically speaking, at just about any level. anything over a 2, over a LARGE sample, is doing very well.
LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.

Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
 
Reply With Quote
SHAKE
Old 06-11-2007, 03:42 AM #6 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 278
SHAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chopper
from what i've read, you need to determine YOUR OWN NATURAL STYLE.

if you are a bit nitty, 20/10/2 (vpip/pfr/AF).

i, however, like to see a few more hands, i run 24/15/3.

however, i've read ideal river numbers are...w$wsf 30-35, w$sd 50-60. and your WtSD number should be in the lower 20's.

bottom line is when you establish your own personal vpip/pfr/AF numbers, you will start to be better at pinning your opponents on ranges based on what you would play and whether your opponent is looser/tighter than you. that alone will make you a better reader of hands...so long as you are a profitable player.

oh, and as for win rate...euphorism (i think) will tell you that you just cannot run over a 2 for 100k hands, mathematically speaking, at just about any level. anything over a 2, over a LARGE sample, is doing very well.
I just have to dissagree with the WTS stat. Where did you hear that 20% is standerd at 6max. Thats is waaay to tight. 30-35 at least. Think about it, there is alot more value in medium strength hands." If your calling and always winning, you not calling enough"~CAro.
Reply With Quote
Ragnar4
Old 06-11-2007, 04:59 AM #7 (permalink)  
Ragnar4's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 1,284
Ragnar4 will become famous soon enoughRagnar4 will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to Ragnar4
Chopper:

I just want to determine the numbers that I may co-incide with as much as set a benchmark I want to aim for.

While it is correct, IMO, to set your own style, and go with it, some areas are going to be obvious leaks. LIke a huge WTS, with a low win percentage = Calling with 2nd best waaaay too often. I want to identify numbers that are anamalous in order to try to keep this BB/100 in the green. I don't think I could handle being felted again. lol
The older I get, the more I start wondering; Just what in the hell is going on here?
 
Reply With Quote
SHAKE
Old 06-11-2007, 05:58 AM #8 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 278
SHAKE
26/18/2.5 (3.0)

WTS 33 W$@S 50+ ATTS 33%-40%

thats good lookin six max stats
Reply With Quote
Stagemn
Old 06-11-2007, 09:20 PM #9 (permalink)  
Stagemn's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 195
Stagemn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chopper
....and your WtSD number should be in the lower 20's.
are you kidding me? weak tightys loose so much money by not going to SD.

I've always based other players at my table compared to my own numbers. I usually don't play with Aggression Factors on my HUD, but Aggression Frequencies (bet+raise divided by bet+raise+call). Comes with PokerAce. Normally between 50 & 60 is about right. Higher is very aggressive, lower is more passive.

And yes my WWSF is high.... I like it like that. I play based on position, aggressiveness, & cards, not simply cards. The higher the better.
Reply With Quote
SHAKE
Old 06-12-2007, 12:25 AM #10 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 278
SHAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stagemn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chopper
....and your WtSD number should be in the lower 20's.
are you kidding me? weak tightys loose so much money by not going to SD.

I've always based other players at my table compared to my own numbers. I usually don't play with Aggression Factors on my HUD, but Aggression Frequencies (bet+raise divided by bet+raise+call). Comes with PokerAce. Normally between 50 & 60 is about right. Higher is very aggressive, lower is more passive.

And yes my WWSF is high.... I like it like that. I play based on position, aggressiveness, & cards, not simply cards. The higher the better.
Your 1/2 right. The higher the better is not true though. If your allways winning when you see the flop, your not seeing the flop enough. If your WWSF is 60% your leaving alot of coin on that table. If people fear you that much all the more reason to play back. WWSF should be 40% top. You might be missing alot of value also by not showing down made hands,.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.