|
Fnord
|
11-17-2004, 09:34 AM
Post subject: 2/4 full blind defense
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
CARDSON
Villian is a little LAggy, but I've been getting the best of him on prior hands. Been open raising as thin as weak suited Kings. I figure he steals here 40%+
I think every street could have been played differently.
***** Hand History *****
$2/$4 Hold'em
Seat 7 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 3: Duck1 ( $108 )
Seat 6: Duck2 ( $143 )
Seat 7: Goose ( $71.75 )
Seat 10: Duck3 ( $130 )
Seat 9: Fnord ( $204.5 )
Seat 1: Duck4 ( $61 )
Seat 2: Duck5 ( $245 )
Seat 5: Duck6 ( $231.75 )
Seat 8: Duck7 ( $86 )
Duck7 posts small blind [$1].
Fnord posts big blind [$2].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ As 6d ]
Duck3 folds.
Duck4 folds.
Duck5 folds.
Duck1 folds.
Duck6 folds.
Duck2 folds.
Goose raises [$4].
Duck7 did not respond in time.
Duck7 folds.
Fnord calls [$2].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 6h, Ah, Ks ]
Fnord checks.
Goose bets [$2].
Fnord raises [$4].
Goose calls [$2].
** Dealing Turn ** [ Jh ]
Fnord bets [$4].
Goose raises [$8].
Fnord calls [$4].
** Dealing River ** [ 2s ]
Fnord bets [$4].
Goose calls [$4].
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
lonnie
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 923
|
|
The only thing I can see that you could do differently is a check-call on the river, if you think he may have hit two pair or the flush when the J fell. That would be read dependent though.
Edit: You obviously have the best hand on the flop or he's reraising you. Since the only hands that he can have that could have improved him on the turn are AJ or two hearts, the bet on the river is good.
|
|
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
Personally, I like the aggression of betting out on the river after he raised you on the turn. Not sure I'd have been that aggressive but I like the play nonetheless. I'm curious, would you have called had he raised you on the river? Pot was what, $41 at that point with 4 more to call if he raised you? I'd have been really thinking flush if he raised the river but I'm not sure I could have gotten away from my 2 pair.
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
Personally, I like the aggression of betting out on the river after he raised you on the turn. Not sure I'd have been that aggressive but I like the play nonetheless.
|
I seriously considered 3-betting the turn. I'll believe he has 2 hearts when I see it. However, a big heart semi-bluff was possible. Although, I think I'm giving these guys too much credit to make that play. Anyway, plan was to bet out any non-heart river. Check/raising the river might have also been possible, but I would really hate for him to check behind me.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
I'm curious, would you have called had he raised you on the river? Pot was what, $41 at that point with 4 more to call if he raised you? I'd have been really thinking flush if he raised the river but I'm not sure I could have gotten away from my 2 pair.
|
Short-handed I must call this to show the table I'm willing to showdown a hand. Full-table it's closer, but I would still cry and call.
|
|
|