Originally Posted by koolmoe

We're in the same ballpark. You are slightly looser and more aggressive than me, but about the same winrate (2.28 for me).

Originally Posted by Nehmer

Dang, I must be a LAgg now that I moved up to 6-max. I was borderline rock at full ring, but my 6-max VPIP and PFR are both significantly higher than Jeffs which apparently are higher than yours. Kinda wierd that my style would change so much just by switching to a different number of players at the table.

Originally Posted by Nehmer

Dang, I must be a LAgg now that I moved up to 6-max. I was borderline rock at full ring, but my 6-max VPIP and PFR are both significantly higher than Jeffs which apparently are higher than yours. Kinda wierd that my style would change so much just by switching to a different number of players at the table.

Originally Posted by ArcticKnight

Hi folks

One thing to keep in mind about 6 max, is that IMO being a Lagg does not work in the long term.

One of the key principles of being able to be agressive and still be +EV is that you are only playing premium hands.

I see players loosen up at 6max to 22-30% and still try to play the hands just as aggressively as they did at 8% to 11% 10handed. When you think about it, this can't work. It's an incompatable way to approach the game. You are playing a broader range of hands, so your aggression level needs to come down or you will be spewing chips.

IMO the best players in 6 max are semi-loose (let's say 23 to 29%) and with agression levels that are mid-range between agressive and passive.

So, there is nothing too wrong with being SLAP (semi-loose agressive passive), but being a LAGG is going to be dificult to pull off long-term.

Now....back to golfing......