Straight
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 192
|
|
if anyone was to make the argument that PP was rigged would have to realize the following.
1. PP would not choose one player over another, even if by some odd reason they did, they are a multi billion dollar company and if one person caught evidence of that=huge lawsuit, they are not in it to loose money.
2. Ok, lets just for one second say that the cards are not totally random, the only reason why they would ever want two people to go all in is not because they choose one person over the other, its because they would want a bigger total pot so they can take more money out of the rake. People who work at PP make so much money anyways it would not be worth they're time to sit at the medium-small limit tables. It would be far more worth they're while to go to vegas and play the million dollar money games.
3. They would not want to wreck their reputation, the poker world is a huge empire and people would rather have a better rep.
4. The odds for a bad beat are far more likely to happen since you get to play so many hands, if in a regular home game you could, theoretically play 100 hands on a given game say in 3 hours, if you play the same 3 hours on the computer you could end up playing close to three hundred hands, thats 1-3. which equals more weird happenings.
5. would the Mike sexton really advertise something that is rigged??lol  lol
|