Full House
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,064
|
|
I'm glad somebody brought this up. I was going to start a topic on this too. I have no idea. I can think of pros and cons to both.
On one hand, it seems logical for a skilled player to always have a full stack. This gives you a chance to take down a huge pot on every hand.
From the money management perspective, I kind of like playing until I go bust. I try to always have 10x buy-in in bankroll, because I figure: "what are the odds I will go bust 10 times in a row?" If I do rebuys during play, it kind of ruins that philosophy.
|