Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nu Zuland bru
Posts: 939
|
|
Cool daven, cheers for the reply, I'll think on it 
Today's review:
$0.10/$0.25 No Limit Holdem
6 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
Stacks:
UTG Etrain99 ($28.80)
UTG+1 DeNmiX ($14.35)
CO outperformer ($25.40)
BTN Hero ($27.85)
SB Dabbar ($25)
BB <Bogolal> ($31.80)
Pre-Flop: ($0.35, 6 players) Hero is BTN  
1 fold, DeNmiX raises to $1, 1 fold, Hero raises to $3, 2 folds, DeNmiX calls $2
Flop:    ($6.35, 2 players)
DeNmiX checks, Hero bets $4.75, DeNmiX calls $4.75
Turn:  ($15.85, 2 players)
DeNmiX goes all-in $6.60, $6.6 to Hero ($20.1)?
Villain is 36/23 over 44 hands
Preflop: I think his range for calling my 3bet preflop is { 22+, AQ+, 32s+ } against which I've got like 52% equity.
Flop: On the flop, I think his range for calling my cbet is: {AQ+, 77+, 32cc-JTcc, QJs-KQs } against which I've got 62% equity.
Turn: Here I think his range for open shoving is: {77, AA, QQ, AQ, 32cc-JTcc} against which I have 32% equity, so I'm getting 2.125 : 1 and calling $6.60 to win way more than 2.125*6.6 so it's an easy call.
Now my reason for posting this hand is mostly because he showed up at the end with 3c2c here. If I didn't know that (say I'd folded the turn) then I would never have included that in his range. So when doing analysis like this do you guys think it's better to include bizzare shit like that in his range, which feels like it's being results-oriented, or to ignore it and build a "sensible" range, which feels even more retarded because I'm basing the decisions of my play against a range I know to be inaccurate. Curious to hear your thoughts.
|