Thread: 99 in a crunch
View Single Post
Im_new
Old 09-12-2009, 10:26 PM #38 (permalink)  
Im_new's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,055
Im_new
Send a message via Yahoo to Im_new
Quote:
Originally Posted by tugger
Quote:
Originally Posted by Im_new
Is everyone keeping into consideration that this is a big ole donkament?
My bankroll is lurking between $100 and $150 (can't seem to get any higher) at any given time, which means I have no choice but to play these donkaments. I refuse point blank to top my bankroll up, I earned what I have through freerolls and a $10 present off my brother. That's it. So even if I blow my bankroll, it cost me nothing.

I *try* to rise above the donk plays that everyone else is making, I figure if I'm playing good, tight poker, then in theory I should be able to walk thorugh these tourneys, unless I'm card dead. Of course, it doesn't work out like this, I usually get my AQ busted by AT to bust out, or something similar. But the point I'm trying to make is, I try not to lower myself to their standards.

Would a donk fold 99 to an all in here? Probably not. I don't want to be that donk. Now, don't get me wrong, I call this if I have to, but we don't have to here.

Now, I'm probably leaving myself wide open to ridicule here, but if I'm playing a table of donks, I TIGHTEN my range in this spot! I'd rather try to outplay the donks after the flop, rather than get into a race pre flop with them. I'm patient enough to wait for a better spot. JJ, QQ, KK, AA, AK, AQ, maybe TT. These are the hands I call here, unless I have a real good read on the player.

And, it should be added, 99 is one of my least favourite hands. I think I lose money overall with this hand, which is why I'm so keen to muck the fucker. So perhaps my opinion is biased.

"By saying things like that, we assume that our opponents are knowledgeable and that he is capable of high order thinking skills. "

Heh, I take this as a compliment!
...way to ramble. lol

I am well rolled for these (I have 4.5k from cash tables). I would play higher stakes but I'm not comfy with tournaments just yet. The whole argument from before about bankroll affecting the "correct" play has no affect on me. I choose to play what is optimal each and every time in these tournaments.

I think you're losing with 99 because you're pretty close-minded about how poker should be played overall. People around here all know that I will hold my ground and bicker a bit about a stance I take, but sometimes, you just have to listen to the pros.
Reply With Quote