View Single Post
Penneywize
Old 08-11-2009, 09:47 PM #10 (permalink)  
Penneywize's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 885
Penneywize will become famous soon enoughPenneywize will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmcboy
I should add that if buying HEM/PT3 takes a big chunk of your roll, you are at a level where you can have plenty of success with no HUD. And it's probably better when you're learning to play less tables and focus more on getting reads. If it doesn't take a chunk, then you should buy it even if you don't play a lot of tables. For a long time I had a HUD for NLHE but not for omaha. Once I finally started the omaha one there were a lot of regs that I "knew" who played much looser/tighter than I thought just based on my observations.
Well it seems that maybe I should try posting in the wrong forum next time, since my thread on a related topic didn't get very much attention

Anyhow, seems as though this thread has addressed a few of my concerns -- notably on the pervasiveness of HUD usage.

I take it from your post drmc that HEM and PT3 are the standards in terms of HUDs being used nowadays? I'm mainly playing low-stakes MTTs and all I've used so far is Poker Edge (same site as pokersherlock so I figure they're just skins of one another..?). Should I look into these two instead?

Edit: NM downloaded PT3, and it owns.
Reply With Quote