Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,405
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ragnar4
Just so we're clear here, wouldn't this be an adjustment? The same type of "adjustment" that people suggest so vociferously that we should never, ever make at micros, because we don't need to? Instead of exercising "table selection" which is what the OP is referring to?
|
There are certain types of adjustments that are good and others that are bad at micros. The point of the generalizations is that a tight-aggressive game can beat the crap out of microstakes players while you incrementally learn how to make proper adjustments.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by iopq
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ragnar4
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
Quote:
|
During the week I constantly leave tables because it folded to the BB a couple of times at FR.
|
One solution to some of your issues as a player would probably be resolved by re-reading this statement and figuring out what you can do about it. |
Raise from HJ and CO with a wider range?
Like 27o+ |
Only if BB has a low VPIP
if he's like 30/20 there's a good reason it gets folded to him |
Ragnar4's response is one possibility, but there are others.
The chance of all players left to act staying in the hand are equally important when considering fold equity, not just the big blind. If there are players left to act with position on you, the chances that they stay in the hand are actually more important than the players left to act without position on you since the impact on the EV of your raise is impacted more when someone calls in position.
|