4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: swonging and swonging
Posts: 1,550
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Deanglow
Quote:
|
we have him at 14% pfr over a small sample size. I don't know a goddamn thing about 200nl, maybe by the time I get there my ideas will change. Right now, if I see a guy with 14% pfr over a small sample size, I consider him a lagtard until proven otherwise (despite the fact that I generally run higher than that). Call.
|
WOW I never thought I would see the day when 14% pfr was considered a lagtard. |
Maybe it's just that I'm used to incredibly passive 25nl. I was on a table today running 10/10 (card-dead) over ~50 hands and I had the highest pfr% on the table.
|