4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,068
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MuddyWicket
just realised why fold to cbet is better info on hud than calls cbet. I think my trouble was the description is "fold continuation bet" ie how often they fold their own cbet??? the word 'to' would have been usefull in that description.
|
I just went away from "folds c-bet" to having both "calls c-bet" and "raises c-bet" on my HUD.
There's this phenomenon at NL10 on my site that I don't understand. In the last two weeks, we've gone from very few c-bet rr's to it happening every third time. I know. I became a c-betting monkey and it paid well for 3 months. It's not any more. I've got 7k hands that show it. If anyone knows what might have happened, I'd like to hear about it. (I try to avoid considering "the fish learned to play better" option. That's too bleak for words.)
Anyway, when I c-bet, he's got to either fold, call or raise, right? So I check his call + raise numbers both, now, to see if he's one of the new breed. I use color coding. I have "raise cbet" > 15% coded to show up red. (I just started this yesterday, to try to find countermeasures to the new trend, so any comments about where the danger zone is here would be appreciated.) And I can get his "folds to c-bet" number from the other two, most days.
These c-bet posts have been great for me. I'm really struggling with cbets right now. Thanks to Hawkfan and spoon and the others. This is really helping.
|