View Single Post
spoonitnow
Old 01-02-2008, 10:10 AM #16 (permalink)  
spoonitnow's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
spoonitnow is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to spoonitnow Send a message via MSN to spoonitnow Send a message via Yahoo to spoonitnow Send a message via Skype™ to spoonitnow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chopper
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robb
For an example of a "losing player's mentality", I told the wife this morning that "I won $73 last night." It's true, sort of. I ground out 1k hands of NL10 and was up 7 BI afterwards. But you know what? I really just won my typical 6 ptBB/100. And when I drop 3 BI in a session, I'm really just earning my typical 6 ptBB/100. Every hour I play, if I play optimally, I'm just earning my historic win rate / 100 hands. Hopefully, I'm doing slightly better if I'm learning to play better. But too many people focus on the $$/session and not how well they played.
this is the way we are supposed to think right here.
I don't necessarily disagree with Chopper but I think there are better ways. However, I think that what Robb said is a step along the way towards what I think we're "supposed" to think about our session: almost a total disregard for actual results, but instead total focus on how we played and improving our game.

Of course, it's easier said than done if you don't know that you're a winning player, but I believe it's part of the process.

Depending on the wording this could mean the same thing for some people, but just thought I'd throw it out there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.

Rule # 1: don't ask questions

Rule # 2: don't ask questions

I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
 
Reply With Quote