4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,446
|
|
you had ATs with 875 at the 50/100 level on hand 97.
the thing that stands out for me in this experiment is how often table image and knowing your opponent come into play. i also thought i had a really good idea on how some of you guys played but after looking at all the hands, i was way off. it was really interesting to hear the thought processes on some hands because it was nothing of what i expected. even after 200+ hands recorded on Poker Tracker and consistant note taking, I still didn't have accurate knowledge on most peoples games.
after noticing how wrong i was about how people would act, i starting thinking about how predicible or non-prediciable my game is. maybe i think im changing gears or playing a different style when I'm actually NOT. i sort of develped a non-written system for what hands I play in what positions, and I might have gotten to strick in following it. this is a problem because when players know exactly how you act, you lose money. fortunetly I have the luxury of playing against new people all the time, so they don't know of my nit-tendencies. but its something id definetly have to work on when playing against the same players regularly
|