Flush
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: They were suited!
Posts: 336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zenbitz
It seemed to me that since the SNG satts (at least on PS/PP) weren't THAT much easier than regular 2/3-table SNGS, and 1st in one of those paid > enough get a buy in with cash, that these were silly?
Am I wrong? (I am at work so I cannot look up the buy ins)
|
Well, you could look at these like any other tournament, in that if you don't feel like you're getting a good enough return on your money, then don't play. Not all satellites have a desirable payout structure, so it's up to you to decide which ones are worth your time.
Some sats are silly. Some are easier to make an edge in than others.
|