4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 1,720
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DavSimon
Very nice Michael, I suppose this was a sub-satellite to a larger WSOP satellite? How long did it take to play out with only 99 participants? I have only played 1 PL tourney and it seemed very Laggy...what was your experience? Is there a reason you chose PL over a NL satellite...simply convienence...or was there another strategy behind it?
Again..beautiful job, It is too bad you didn't win the seat....but there are plenty more satellites to come. Perhaps I will see you in one  |
??? It wasn't a satelliete, nor was it related to the WSOP at all. It took 3 hours to play, and the final table seemed like it lasted 10 minutes. For the most part though, as you can tell in this hand history, MOST of the players were pretty tight, with a couple very loose players thrown in, and it didn't feel as aggressive as most NL tournies do deep into them.
I just chose to play PL because its what was available at the time, but its not that different of a game for me. The only big difference for my play is when you're short stacked and you're looking to go all in preflop. Post flop I very rarely bet more than the pot size.
|