| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Fri, 12 Nov 2004, 3:44am Post subject: full boat vs 'nut' flush
|
 |
|
Strike 3
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 2223
WPP: 4
Location: Sacramento
|
|
| {This post has been removed} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 12 Nov 2004, 3:59am Post subject:
|
|
|
One Pair
Joined: 12 Nov 2004
Posts: 24
WPP: 222
|
|
I would have bet that flop if I were him, to test your hand strength if nothing else.
Dunno, I'm more of a limit player myself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 12 Nov 2004, 10:28am Post subject:
|
|
|
Season I
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 2359
WPP: 74
Location: Dallas, TX
|
|
| Underdog72 wrote: | | I would have bet that flop if I were him |
True, kind of a tough one:
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing Qs Qc 5c
cards -- %win -- EV
Ac Jc -- 50.81 -- 0.510
7d 7h -- 48.89 -- 0.490
This kind of hand might enhance my understanding of ToP. If you suspect a semi-bluff and ave a hand worth calling, you should raise. The $6 just barely lays correct odds to the flush draw.
The other probable hand with a $6 bet on that flop is obviously a Q:
cards -- %win -- EV
Ac Jc -- 25.86 -- 0.259
Qd 7h -- 74.14 -- 0.741
Note the stark difference in prognosis for AJ, on account of trips boating so much more frequently than 2pair.
Raising Ripp here is (I think) a good defense to the semibluff. A reraise from Ripp would indicate the Q and you could save a few chips. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive $250 freeroll for FTR at LuckyAcePoker on Dec 18!
