|
|
Poker Forum
|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 4:49am Post subject: Which bluff got called? |
|
|
One Pair
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 558
WPP: 109
|
|
These are all from the same aggressive hu session.
Three bluffs, what do you think about these? One got called, but which one?
NR 1:
Ongame Texas Hold'em $6-$12 NL (real money)
Seat 7: BB ($3,074.80 in chips)
Seat 10: HERO [ AD,KC ] ($961.00 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
HERO posts blind ($3), BB posts blind ($6).
PRE-FLOP
HERO bets $15, BB calls $12.
FLOP [board cards 8D,4D,JC ]
BB checks, HERO bets $45, BB calls $45.
TURN [board cards 8D,4D,JC,5S ]
BB checks, HERO bets $90, BB calls $90.
RIVER [board cards 8D,4D,JC,5S,QH ]
BB bets $200, HERO bets $550...
-------------
NR 2:
Ongame Texas Hold'em $6-$12 NL (real money)
Seat 7: BUTTON ($2,885.80 in chips)
Seat 10: HERO [ 8H,KH ] ($826.00 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
BUTTON posts blind ($3), HERO posts blind ($6).
PRE-FLOP
BUTTON bets $17, HERO calls $14.
FLOP [board cards 2S,4S,7S ]
HERO bets $42, BUTTON calls $42.
TURN [board cards 2S,4S,7S,6S ]
HERO bets $99, BUTTON calls $99.
RIVER [board cards 2S,4S,7S,6S,9H ]
HERO bets $300...
-------------
NR 3:
Ongame Texas Hold'em $6-$12 NL (real money)
Seat 7: BUTTON ($2,190.40 in chips)
Seat 9: HERO [ 5C,5H ] ($1513.00 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
BUTTON posts blind ($3), HERO posts blind ($6).
PRE-FLOP
BUTTON bets $17, HERO bets $66, BUTTON calls $52.
FLOP [board cards QS,TH,8D ]
HERO bets $150, BUTTON calls $150.
TURN [board cards QS,TH,8D,9H ]
HERO checks, BB bets $150, HERO bets $450... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 5:09am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 821
WPP: 93
Location: Deventer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 6:44am Post subject: |
|
|
Straight
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 212
WPP: 441
|
|
| 1st - its likely has either 9 10 or JQ here and I think they would both call, or raise in 9 10's case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 7:02am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 1941
WPP: 55
Location: Dizzy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 11:04am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 584
WPP: 57
Location: In S-mart Swallowing Your Soul!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 11:55am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 2911
WPP: 107
|
|
1st seems like it would be called because the bet is so small relative to pot, but that's too obvious.
3rd, because how can he call 2 bets with no spade, then fold? A set? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 1:51pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 1679
WPP: 142
Location: Kansas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 4:55pm Post subject: |
|
|
One Pair
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 558
WPP: 109
|
|
| zenbitz wrote: | 1st seems like it would be called because the bet is so small relative to pot, but that's too obvious.
3rd, because how can he call 2 bets with no spade, then fold? A set? |
In nr2 villain of course has a spade. But he knows that I know that he has a spade. So how good does your Queen high flush look when a guy who knows you have a flush is betting the pot into you on the river?
I know that he knows that I know that he has a spade. Would then be quite crazy to bluff here, right? WRONG! It's clearly a very good spot to rep the Ace of spades, because it sure doesn't look like he has it... I also bet the flop, which adds to the probability that i've got it.
Dont try this at low stakes though... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 8:26pm Post subject: |
|
|
Almost as bad as that idiot redgrape
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 5925
WPP: 73
|
|
| nice analysis on hand 2, however opp could also show up with a set here which he has to fold on the river i'd assume. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 21 Jul 2007, 7:09pm Post subject: |
|
|
One Pair
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 558
WPP: 109
|
|
| IowaSkinsFan wrote: | | nice analysis on hand 2, however opp could also show up with a set here which he has to fold on the river i'd assume. |
Well a set could work as a bluffcatcher I guess, but I would never call a pot sized bet with a set here, no matter how much I suspected a bluff.
Result: NR 3 got called. Villain turned two pair with Q9.
In NR 3 I was trying to check down my pocket fives on the turn, but when villain weak-bet, I thought I could steal it easily. I guess I got levelled myself here... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 7 Hours |
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot rate topics in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by
.
Forum style based on NoseBleed by mikelothar.com.
|
