| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 10:56am Post subject: what's wrong with this picture? some stats
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 544 WPP: 92
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 11:54am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 997 WPP: 80
Location: IN UR BOX HAXXING UR FILEZ
|
|
| Tighten up in the blinds. If your BB VPIP is bigger than your EP you're too loose there. This is more of a Laggy style, but I think if you're going to do it your doing it fine? It's hard to say with just stats. Post some hands maybe? Or if you haven't been a successful TAG yet, maybe try that style for a little? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 12:18pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 544 WPP: 92
|
|
| freechus9 wrote: | | Tighten up in the blinds. If your BB VPIP is bigger than your EP you're too loose there. This is more of a Laggy style, but I think if you're going to do it your doing it fine? It's hard to say with just stats. Post some hands maybe? Or if you haven't been a successful TAG yet, maybe try that style for a little? |
TAG I do fine, just trying to open wide profitably... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 12:30pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 544 WPP: 92
|
|
Top10 losing hands on button:
1.QQ
2.96s
3.Q7s
4.33
5.97s
6.AKo
7.53s
8.65o
9.T8s
10.KTo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 12:42pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17644 WPP: 82
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| asdpikas wrote: | | Top10 losing hands on button: |
Sample size is too small. At best you can look at groups of related hands. 22-55, A2-A8s, etc. should all have similar EV. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 1:07pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 3580 WPP: 79
Location: emo-kid
|
|
| the vast majority of players with higher than 25% VPIP have a losing winrate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 1:23pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 544 WPP: 92
|
|
| |~|ypermegachi wrote: | | the vast majority of players with higher than 25% VPIP have a losing winrate. |
What does this mean? What can i learn from this reply? I'm trying to be in the small minority with a winning winrate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 1:32pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17644 WPP: 82
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| Playing so many hands will cause you have greater swings, put you in more difficult post-flop spots, make it easier to get post-flop reads on you and increase your exposure to the rake. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 2:23pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 3580 WPP: 79
Location: emo-kid
|
|
| asdpikas wrote: | | |~|ypermegachi wrote: | | the vast majority of players with higher than 25% VPIP have a losing winrate. |
What does this mean? What can i learn from this reply? I'm trying to be in the small minority with a winning winrate. |
if you need to ask about your stats, you are probably not in the minority of the minority that can win with a high VPIP. i'm pretty surprised u could break even with those stats. if you dropped to 20-25 VPIP i'm sure you'd get a 3+ winrate no problemo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 2:59pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17644 WPP: 82
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| |~|ypermegachi wrote: | | i'm pretty surprised u could break even with those stats. |
He probably plays better than you post-flop.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 5:03pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 544 WPP: 92
|
|
| |~|ypermegachi wrote: |
if you need to ask about your stats, you are probably not in the minority of the minority that can win with a high VPIP. i'm pretty surprised u could break even with those stats. if you dropped to 20-25 VPIP i'm sure you'd get a 3+ winrate no problemo. |
I can play 20-25 VP with higher than 3+ winrate at this level.
That is not the point. A monkey with a stick can beat PartyPoker's 25NL.
As said, i'm trying to open wider while retaining profitability, which has not been accomplished yet, since i'm only break-even.
Thus, this post, where i look for your insights and thoughts on the matter.
Had i known i would get responses with such insight as "the majority of VP25+ players are losers over time" i wouldnt have bothered though.
I know the sample is small and all, but still, i expected something better than that Hyper. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 6:05pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 157 WPP: 133
Location: count-n mah monies stewie-style
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 6:26pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 3089 WPP: 159
|
|
| asdpikas wrote: |
I can play 20-25 VP with higher than 3+ winrate at this level.
That is not the point. A monkey with a stick can beat PartyPoker's 25NL.
As said, i'm trying to open wider while retaining profitability, which has not been accomplished yet, since i'm only break-even.
Thus, this post, where i look for your insights and thoughts on the matter.
Had i known i would get responses with such insight as "the majority of VP25+ players are losers over time" i wouldnt have bothered though.
I know the sample is small and all, but still, i expected something better than that Hyper. |
You need to get yourself an unwaddenator for your panties.
Serusleetho - 1. the sample IS small, and that's a problem; 2. hand histories would mean more than stats. Too tight/too loose from any position, at any stakes, is very relative to your opposition and how good you are post-flop. And these stats don't show any of that, so really, they don't mean very much. So you can pretty well expect to not get much in the way of constructive criticism. Post half a dozen hands you lost money with on the button and let's start there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 6:37pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 3817 WPP: 142
Location: Ballarat, Australia
|
|
| Playing really laggy requires really good postflop skills. If you're losing, your postflop skills arent up to scratch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Jul 2008, 11:49pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 384 WPP: 90
Location: On Tony Romo's nuts
|
|
| You're playing way too lose from the blinds/ep. You are probably raising limpers to light. If you are playing that loose from blinds-utg1 you aren't a lag you are a fish. Especially at 25nl. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 02 Jul 2008, 3:03am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 3580 WPP: 79
Location: emo-kid
|
|
whatever dude, i'm just tryin to save you time and suffering. by the time you somehow manage to win with these stats, you woulda moved up 2 or 3 levels playing with more regular stats.
if you're still bent on winning with those LAG stats you should post hands, not stats. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 02 Jul 2008, 7:17am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 544 WPP: 92
|
|
| |~|ypermegachi wrote: | whatever dude, i'm just tryin to save you time and suffering. by the time you somehow manage to win with these stats, you woulda moved up 2 or 3 levels playing with more regular stats.
if you're still bent on winning with those LAG stats you should post hands, not stats. |
Fair enough, i'll try to post more HHs |
|
|
|
|
|
|