| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Mon, 28 Feb 2005, 9:17pm Post subject: umm is this right?
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 192 WPP: 245
|
|
Dealer: KYvampyre, it's your turn. You have 15 seconds to act
Dealer: Regular time for player KYvampyre has expired, TIME BANK has been activated
Dealer: Game #1285472828: Mr_Sarcastic wins pot (150)
Dealer: DUCKPOKER, it's your turn. You have 15 seconds to act
Dealer: Mr_Sarcastic has a straight, Eight to Queen
Dealer: Mr_Sarcastic has 8,7,6,5,A for Lo
Dealer: KYvampyre has two pair, Queens and Eights
Dealer: KYvampyre has 8,7,6,4,2 for Lo
Dealer: Game #1285480271: Mr_Sarcastic wins Hi pot (1370) with a straight, Eight to Queen
Dealer: Game #1285480271: KYvampyre wins Lo pot (1370) with 8,7,6,4,2
im not the newest player to omaha but am i missing somthing, this happened in my tourney tonight and im wondering why Mr Sarcastic didnt win the entire pot? Please explain to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 28 Feb 2005, 9:36pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 206 WPP: 88
|
|
| Because the other guy's hand was lower. 8764 v 8765. Whoever's hand would lose if it were high wins the low. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 28 Feb 2005, 11:03pm Post subject: top to bottom?
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 192 WPP: 245
|
|
| so with the low, it goes from top to bottom for size of lo, ex 76532 wins agianst 7654A, top to bottom? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Mar 2005, 12:20am Post subject: Re: top to bottom?
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 3580 WPP: 79
Location: emo-kid
|
|
| Mony B wrote: | | so with the low, it goes from top to bottom for size of lo, ex 76532 wins agianst 7654A, top to bottom? |
just read it like a number
76532 is a smaller number than 76541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|