Poker Forum

Poker Forum

HOTFTR 5 Year $300 Freeroll on Full Tilt Dec 4th + FTR Gear! Poker Forum  Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember Me         Forgot Password

  >    > 

Smoking bans in public places

  
Page 1 of 2  ||  Post new topic  |  Post reply Goto page 1, 2  Next

Author Message
Lukie
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 10:51am    Post subject: Smoking bans in public places Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3248
WPP: 165
Location: Ohio
Here's a post I've been meaning to make for a while. It's also been a while since we've had a good debate. Ohio has somewhat recently passed a law banning smoking indoors in public places. Many states have similar laws.

I think this is a fantastic law (it's not often I can say that). I mean, it's easy to say 'if you don't like it, leave', but what gives you the right to shit in somebody else's lungs? As I see it, it's an issue of comfort and health.

I am a non-smoker so I may be a little biased, but I'm also a libertarian, generally dislike government, and support many rights which would not personally benefit me.
View user's profile Send private message
givememyleg
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 11:11am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 4170
WPP: 113
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
I'm a non-smoker, and absolutely hate second hand smoke from cigarettes, but I think banning smoking in public places is wrong. If someone wants to make a restaurant non-smoking, then they should be allowed. However, why should they be forced to make their store/bar/whatever non-smoking?

Another example that recently came up, is the university on my hometown is going to be enforcing a smoking ban next school year. This means you can't have any form of smoke tobacco on campus, or else you get a ticket. I can definitely understand not allowing people to smoke inside the building, and maybe even outside where people walk between classes, but this ban includes even the parking lots and in your own car. You won't be able to go to your car to smoke, you would have to leave campus entirely. Just kind of seems like it's infringing on peoples rights. If people want to smoke and kill themselves, they should be able to do it, no matter how stupid it is... I guess?

But I'll be honest, I love that I can go into a poker room anywhere in the US and never have to smell cigarette smoke.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger WordPress Blog
Ragnar4
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 11:16am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 769
WPP: 151
Location: Moscow, Idaho
Being a nonsmoker and being allergic to smoke I had to give the Law in Washington banning smoking in public places the "slow clap that gets faster".
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
euphoricism
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 11:33am    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3566
WPP: 98
Location: Your place or my place
I fucking hate when someone is smoking near me, because it smells like shit. However, I firmly believe he or she has every right to smoke in public, and I also believe it should be 100% up to the business as to whether they will allow smoking or not. It is not the job of our legislators to decide what I do with my business or my body.

That said the dangers of second hand smoke have been grossly overstated and based upon bad misleading data and so I do not particularly worry about that aspect.

Also, I'm not anti-tobacco, as I smoke hookah regularly in my own home.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
bigspenda73
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 11:36am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 4923
WPP: 81
Location: Pwnsylvania
The casinos fucked the bars/restaurants in Vegas when I was there with this law.

Some good friends of mine lost their jobs because of it.
View user's profile Send private message WordPress Blog
bigspenda73
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 11:36am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 4923
WPP: 81
Location: Pwnsylvania
Oh I totally love the law, just think the entire US should ban smoking. It's a filthy disgusting habit.
View user's profile Send private message WordPress Blog
Lukie
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 11:39am    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3248
WPP: 165
Location: Ohio
bigspenda73 wrote:
Oh I totally love the law, just think the entire US should ban smoking. It's a filthy disgusting habit.

The .gov makes far too much money off of it for this to ever happen. I'm not even arguing that it should be made illegal, just banning it indoors in public places seems about right to me. I agree that it's a filthy discusting habit.
View user's profile Send private message
BankItDrew
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 11:47am    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 1888
WPP: 75
Location: Soon to be TDot
Owners discretion.
View user's profile Send private message
Lukie
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 11:49am    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3248
WPP: 165
Location: Ohio
euphoricism wrote:
I fucking hate when someone is smoking near me, because it smells like shit. However, I firmly believe he or she has every right to smoke in public, and I also believe it should be 100% up to the business as to whether they will allow smoking or not. It is not the job of our legislators to decide what I do with my business or my body.

Might as well keep it legal in all places then (many states still do this). As a practical matter, you know as well as I do that no bar is going to ban smoking in their establishment if given the choice. Makes terrible business sense. I disagree that everyone should have the right to smoke in public-- it negatively affects the health and comfort of many people arond them.

Quote:
That said the dangers of second hand smoke have been grossly overstated and based upon bad misleading data and so I do not particularly worry about that aspect.

I've heard this argument many times. Care to offer up any credible sources? I'm not disagreeing you; I'd just like to learn more about the subject.
View user's profile Send private message
Lukie
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 11:53am    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3248
WPP: 165
Location: Ohio
BankItDrew wrote:
Owners discretion.

http://www.scientificblogging.com/graphics/beijing%20car%20pollution.jpeg
View user's profile Send private message
mrhappy333
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 11:59am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Posts: 808
WPP: 117
Location: Hartford, CT
Lukie wrote:
bigspenda73 wrote:
Oh I totally love the law, just think the entire US should ban smoking. It's a filthy disgusting habit.

The .gov makes far too much money off of it for this to ever happen. I'm not even arguing that it should be made illegal, just banning it indoors in public places seems about right to me. I agree that it's a filthy discusting habit.

I feel the same way, but I also am a non smoker.
CT has passed this law a few years ago. Its just awesome to be able to go out to dinner or bars with my friends and not come home smelling like an Ashtray.
The law also states they need to stay 25ft away from entrance and exits to building which never happens.
Now its time to ban smoking on Construction sites!!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
badgers
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 12:18pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 2442
WPP: 66
Location: Spewing
A similar law was recently passed in UK and as a non-smoker it has made pubs and clubs so much nicer to go in and I don't have to come home stinking. Also I think it's much better for the staff. Smokers would probs disagree but whatever I also think it should be banned.
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger WordPress Blog
HalvSame
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 12:20pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Life Donk
Life Donk

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 1690
WPP: 89
Location: Having a J. Arthur
Indoor smoking in public places has been banned in Norway since 2004. A bit of an uproar in the beginning but now everyone seem okay with it. Me, I love it.

Fucking smokers!
View user's profile Send private message WordPress Blog
will641
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 12:27pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 1384
WPP: 117
Location: value towning myself
i think that it should be up to the private business'. i personally hate second hand smoke like everyone else, but i also think it would be hugely hypocritical of me to say that we should ban smoking in public places. i mean if you call yourself a libertarian, my feeling is you should be applying the method or theory or w/e you want to call it of having little to no govt, you should be applying it to all areas and not picking and choosing which ones necessarily convenience you.
View user's profile Send private message
BankItDrew
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 1:07pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 1888
WPP: 75
Location: Soon to be TDot
Lukie wrote:
BankItDrew wrote:
Owners discretion.

http://www.scientificblogging.com/graphics/beijing%20car%20pollution.jpeg

I was referring to smoking indoors within the walls owned by non-governmental officials within business. I hardly see how posting a link to a picture that depicts owners of vehicles on roads of public property that is outdoors that might contribute to this thread.

If you were me, you might instead reply with the following (a happy smoker n a train):

Take that ! YAY for no relation !

I'm a smoker and I do not approve of the indoor smoking ban of bars and restaurants, etc. I do not feel this way because I am a smoker, I feel this way because rights were taken away from more people than just the smokers - the owners of the establishments. Your rights and my rights should not increase just because we walked into a place with walls surrounding us. The decision of smoking/non-smoking should have continued to be under the approval of the people who own those walls. Maybe their business will suffer, maybe it won't.

Although your point is an unrelated one (I think your point was that: well, look at what happens when we let owners of things decide for themselves), I'll address it partially anyways... If you had your way, the following would take place:
1) You would no longer be allowed to drink alcohol outside of your own home because I am annoyed and stressed out when people who drink turn obnoxious and loud.
2) Country music and Disco would be illegal.
3) No more cup holders or cell phones in cars - cup holders hold drinks that hinder the quality of drivers when used, while cell phones are obvious.
4) The elimination of publicly owned mass transit.
5) No more airplanes owned by those other than the government, actually, we might as well throw in every form of transportation in there.

I know what you're thinking, that I may be getting a little out of hand, going over the top or too far. I am. I need to because otherwise lines are not drawn between personal rights and the rights of the masses.

Maybe I was wrong in my interpretation of the image you posted. Maybe it had nothing to do with the negatives of owners having rights. Maybe you're thinking, "If own a gun, should I have the right to kill you?" My concern is with the morality, which is dependent upon the overall feelings of the group. Now I'm rambling, even after I said I'd be partial.

bigspenda73 wrote:
Oh I totally love the law, just think the entire US should ban smoking. It's a filthy disgusting habit.

Are you serious?

First of all, smoking does not decrease the lifespan of everyone. Secondly, I mention this because I want to compare it to something: Online Poker! To most, it's a habit that hurts them financially, sometimes significantly. Which in turn, hurts those around them, especially if the addicted gambler has dipped into the income of his family. If you think that smoking should be banned because it's a 'filthy disgusting habit,' do not for a second think that this and online poker are completely unrelated. Believe it or not, this habit does affect many of the people around the user. Many families have been torn apart because of it. My lifespan would greatly decrease if every night I was woken up in the middle of the night to the noise of a family member banging on their desk with their mouse because they're fucking pissed off at the game. Online poker is an extremely economically negative habit to many of its users and to those around them.
View user's profile Send private message
allabout
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 1:22pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight
Straight

Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 220
WPP: 155
Location: VA USA
[quote="BankItDrew"]
Lukie wrote:
BankItDrew wrote:
Owners discretion.


bigspenda73 wrote:
Oh I totally love the law, just think the entire US should ban smoking. It's a filthy disgusting habit.

Are you serious?

First of all, smoking does not decrease the lifespan of everyone. Secondly, I mention this because I want to compare it to something: Online Poker! To most, it's a habit that hurts them financially, sometimes significantly. Which in turn, hurts those around them, especially if the addicted gambler has dipped into the income of his family. If you think that smoking should be banned because it's a 'filthy disgusting habit,' do not for a second think that this and online poker are completely unrelated. Believe it or not, this habit does affect many of the people around the user. Many families have been torn apart because of it. My lifespan would greatly decrease if every night I was woken up in the middle of the night to the noise of a family member banging on their desk with their mouse because they're fucking pissed off at the game. Online poker is an extremely economically negative habit to many of its users and to those around them.


LOL! Sorry, but its not even close to the same thing. I don't know you, however, if I worked in a restaraunt that you went to often and waited on you while you smoked, you are affecting my quality of life. However, you can gamble all the money you have away and it doesn't affect me at all. And I don't mean this as a personal attack on you or anyone (although a lot of smokers seem to take it personally), but smoking is a habit that affects so many more people than just the smoker. To say that smoking doesn't decrease the lifespan of everyone is kinda laughable at this point in time (with all the research and data etc). Are there people that smoke every day of their life and live to be 90? Sure, but there are far more who start smoking at 14 and are dead or suffering at 40.
View user's profile Send private message WordPress Blog
euphoricism
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 1:30pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3566
WPP: 98
Location: Your place or my place
First I want to say that I believe in the philosophy that your right to swing your fist ends where my chin begins. People DO have the right to not breathe cigarette smoke if they don't want to. And they exercise that right by not going to an establishment that permits smoking. Simple.

I fully agree that it should be up to the business to decide whether they want smoking allowed inside or not. I don't see why they would, smokers are used to standing outside and smoking. But in any case I'm not fine with the government telling a business "YOU can't let YOUR customers smoke inside of a store YOU own on land YOU paid for." That's fundamentally against the spirit of our constitution and the concept of "individual liberty". The government needs to stop being my babysitter, protecting me from the evils of the world.


Quote:
As a practical matter, you know as well as I do that no bar is going to ban smoking in their establishment if given the choice. Makes terrible business sense.


If non-smokers don't like a smoking bar, they can find another one. It's that simple. If there are a significant number of people who are so bothered by cigarette smoke that they stop going to bars, then an industry of smoke-free bars will pop up and/or smoking bars will change to non-smoking bars. Its not like non-smokers are the minority.

Quote:

I've heard this argument many times. Care to offer up any credible sources? I'm not disagreeing you; I'd just like to learn more about the subject.


I like Penn & Teller's Bullshit episode on this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKcibsUqN2A

Theres more to that episode but i can only seem to find pieces. See if you can torrent it, it's good.

In any case the basic problems is that the studies that are often quoted (like the 38-year EPA one) treat people who live with a smoker and people who have ever stood next to a smoker as equally likely to get cancer, and they aren't. That is, they're not equal sample populations. Extracting the fact that people who have ingested huge quantities of second hand smoke every day for 15 years get cancer at X rate and then applying it to people who might visit a bar once a month to predict that they'll get cancer at the same rate is absolute foolishness, but that's exactly what they do.

The facts are that we don't have the facts and yet we're acting on rumors and say-so. I'm not saying second hand smoke can't hurt you. I'm saying we just don't know how much and for what length of time, and we should stop making public policy based upon "conventional wisdom". The amount of misinformation is absurd!

I mean look at these two sites I found after just googling "second hand smoke"


Quote:
According to the American Cancer society, secondhand smoke is the third leading preventable cause of death in the U.S. It kills some 38,000 to 65,000 yearly(from the Wisconson health center webpage)


Quote:
Every year environmental smoke (second-hand smoke) kills approximately 53,000 Americans. This is the same number of Americans who died in the Vietnam War! (from the VERY NEXT LINE IN THE SAME PAGE! Which is it?! They don't fucking know because no one fucking knows.)



It's all Bullshit! Even the 1994 EPA study says: "[The EPA] estimates that approximately 3,000 American nonsmokers die each year from lung cancer caused by secondhand smoke."

So where did those 58,000 deaths a year come from? Oh, another EPA study from 1997. In short, they don't fucking have a clue.

I think logic dictates that until enough research has been done, cigarette smoking should not be allowed in places frequented by minors. This would include restaurants unless they had a non-smoking section. Adults are capable of making their own choices.

I can understand people who would prefer that the guy behind him stop smoking. I agree, that shit smells terrible. But the answer is not for a police officer to run up and take it from him. The answer is, "Hey, you mind putting that out? Really bothers me. Thanks man." And if he refuses (which i have NEVER had happen and my girlfriend makes me ask everytime someone lights up around her), get up and move.




Again before someone makes claims that im defending smokers, I don't smoke cigarettes, but I do enjoy hookah approximately once a week.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
euphoricism
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 1:43pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3566
WPP: 98
Location: Your place or my place
From the skeptics magazine webpage:

World Health Organization published a study in 1998 that concluded: "Our results indicate no association between childhood exposure to ETS [environmental tobacco smoke/ Second Hand Smoke] and lung cancer risk." The WHO study also noted that there was only "weak evidence" for a risk of lung cancer from spousal or workplace ETS.

Fact: The study found a Relative Risk (RR) for spousal exposure of 1.16, with a Confidence Interval (CI) of .93 - 1.44. In layman's terms, that means

• Exposure to the ETS from a spouse increases the risk of getting lung cancer by 16%. • Where you'd normally find 100 cases of lung cancer, you'd find 116.

• The 1.16 number is not statistically significant.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
euphoricism
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 1:45pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3566
WPP: 98
Location: Your place or my place
Same site, doing the math provided by the Bullshit TV show:

here is a 25% higher risk of dying of lung cancer from being regularly exposed to passive smoke. For those regularly exposed to ETS, the death rate from lung cancer is 1 in 80,000. For those not exposed, it is 1 in 100,000. Looked at another way: For every million people exposed to ETS, there will be 12.5 deaths from lung cancer; for every million people not exposed to ETS, there will be 10 deaths due to lung cancer. This is statistically of no significance.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
drmcboy
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 1:48pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 6696
WPP: 66
Location: Somewhere in middle america
as a former smoker I think the law is terrible, but it worked out for me because it was right when I was quitting.

as euph says if people actually cared that much there would be a huge market for non smoking bars, there isn't. I have always found that whatever the % of smokers is (I think ~20%?) it goes up well over 50 when you start asking people who hang out in bars. Drinking 6+ beers isn't healthy either.

As for restaurants, they were all heading non smoking anyway so it's kinda a non issue to me.

Either way, vote with your feet. If the club stinks don't go, and feel free to call them and tell them why.

About the only thing I miss about smoking is getting outside more often.
View user's profile Send private message
mrhappy333
Post Posted: Sun, 17 Aug 2008, 1:56pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Posts: 808
WPP: 117
Location: Hartford, CT
well the good news for smokers is now they all get to congregate outside, so its an easy to pick up the opposite sex, or the same sex if thats how you are.