| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 1:30pm Post subject: a couple of beauts' |
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 2223
WPP: 4
Location: Sacramento
|
|
| {This post has been removed} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 1:33pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 1720
WPP: 297
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
|
|
Haha, that first guy really shot himself in the ass by not reraising you ... well ... ever. But at least reraise big on the turn, if not the flop.
As for the second hand ... you're a maniac, Ripp. You had to think it was kind of likely that they had an A or a K with that preflop raise they made. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 1:44pm Post subject: |
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 2223
WPP: 4
Location: Sacramento
|
|
| {This post has been removed} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 3:34pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 1720
WPP: 297
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
|
|
Of course you do. Because you're a maniac.  |
Last edited by michael1123 on Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 8:12pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 4:41pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush
Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 16630
WPP: 84
Location: Blowing Zook off his hand with Seven Deuce
|
|
| michael1123 wrote: |
As for the second hand ... you're a maniac, Ripp. You had to think it was kind of likely that they had an A or a K with that preflop raise they made. |
Disagree, perfect play.
1800 chips in the pot, the other player has less than 1500 left. He flopped a flush draw and a gutshot. Folding would be a disaster. By forcing an all-in he gets QQ/JJ/TT or perhaps Kx to fold often enough to pick up considerable value. Otherwise, he gets his draw or runner runner often enough to make this nearly a coin flip if called. |
Last edited by Fnord on Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 5:02pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 4:50pm Post subject: |
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 2223
WPP: 4
Location: Sacramento
|
|
| {This post has been removed} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 4:55pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush
Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 16630
WPP: 84
Location: Blowing Zook off his hand with Seven Deuce
|
|
| Ripptyde wrote: | why thank you Fnord  |
lol, just as I notice you had the Jack of clubs, not a heart... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 5:23pm Post subject: |
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 2223
WPP: 4
Location: Sacramento
|
|
| {This post has been removed} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 5:44pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 1405
WPP: 94
Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
|
| Fnord wrote: |
Agreed, rippy should be tarred, feathered, and banished from poker forever!.
Once again, rippy has shown a blatant disregard for the conventions that make civilized society possible. He is a danger to himself and others, and I will not rest until I have him deported to a non-poker playing country! |
let's see, hmmm, piss off fnord and rippy in one shot, those aren't bad odds! 
rippy - you've been revised! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 5:50pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush
Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 16630
WPP: 84
Location: Blowing Zook off his hand with Seven Deuce
|
|
| Nahh... I think I'll just shut the fuck up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 5:53pm Post subject: |
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 2223
WPP: 4
Location: Sacramento
|
|
| {This post has been removed} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 5:54pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 1405
WPP: 94
Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
|
| Ripptyde wrote: | LOL Fish
you crack me up mang |
i'm here to entertain!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 7:08pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 1720
WPP: 297
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
|
|
| Fnord wrote: | | Ripptyde wrote: | | why thank you Fnord |
lol, just as I notice you had the Jack of clubs, not a heart... |
Hahaha. I was just about to post "Whoops, I thought he only had one heart."
Since he did in fact just have one, I stand by calling him a maniac. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 7:17pm Post subject: |
|
|
But who will mod the mods?!
Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 4989
WPP: 105
Location: Comic-Con
|
|
Awwwwwww...
And I thought Fnord and Ripp were going to play nice for once. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 7:30pm Post subject: |
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 2223
WPP: 4
Location: Sacramento
|
|
| {This post has been removed} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 10:48pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 1887
WPP: 103
Location: Kansas City
|
|
| Xianti wrote: | Awwwwwww...
And I thought Fnord and Ripp were going to play nice for once. |
It's really funny that I think Fnord and Rippy are the 2 best poker players here for 2 totally different reasons.
Fnord plays well, gets good pot odds, and always justifies every move he makes.
Rippy always plays loose, aggressive, he's a total maniac in the best wayt possible and he plays it to perfection.
Both are great, and if they played a head-to-head, the universe will implode. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Jun 2004, 10:56pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush
Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 16630
WPP: 84
Location: Blowing Zook off his hand with Seven Deuce
|
|
| Humphrind wrote: |
It's really funny that I think Fnord and Rippy are the 2 best poker players here for 2 totally different reasons.
|
I disagree. I'm not one of the 2 best players on the site, even before a certain celebrity joined and I honestly don't know where Rippy stacks up (but I admire his intimidation game.) But thanks for the vote of confidence.
It's easy to look at a post and figure things out with no time constraints or money on the line. It's another thing entirely to have the discipline to do that for every hand durring game-time.
| Humphrind wrote: |
Fnord plays well, gets good pot odds, and always justifies every move he makes.
|
Damn-it. How many blinds must I steal and times must I go all-in with second pair or Ace-rag to fix this impression? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
