Poker Forum

Poker Forum

HOTSpecial freerolls for active members only! Poker Forum  Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember Me         Forgot Password

  >    > 

small SnG tactics...

  
Page 1 of 1  ||  Post new topic  |  Post reply

Author Message
ender555
Post Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 12:42pm    Post subject: small SnG tactics... Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 31 Mar 2005
Posts: 647
WPP: 126

I've read all the stickys, and I like the information there. However none of it that I read talks about playing multiple tables at a time. I guess at such a low buy-in this is unprofitable, but I get bored playing 1 at a time.

So, lets discuss the best tactics if you ARE going to play 2,3, or even 4 low level sng's at a time.

I'm assuming that 'tight is right' is an understatement in this situation. You only play premium hands, and you bet at the flop no matter what hits? fold to a raise, or take down the pot.

Does anyone have experience with multiple tables, and would they fill me in on whether it helped them make or lose money, and how there strategy worked, and what they had to adjust to when practicing mult-table.

Thanks! Razz
View user's profile Send private message
LionsFan20
Post Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 1:12pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
3-of-a-Kind
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 08 Feb 2005
Posts: 74
WPP: 157
Location: O-H... I-O
I've tried playing 3, even 4 tables at once but it just becomes unprofitable for me due to everything happening at once (Murphy's law). When you get in a pot on one table, seems that you're getting in a pot on 1 or two other tables as well, and it makes it difficult (for me anyway) to put the proper attention required on the decisions I'm about to make.

I rarely play more than 2 SnG's at a time, and most of the time i don't even do that. If I'm at a very very slow table and I'm getting bored then I may start playing another one but I guess it all comes down to what you're comfortable with.

Sure the thought of playing and winning 4 SnG's simultaneously sounds sweet, but think about how much time you put into your decisions when the table's down to 3-5 handed and the blinds are at 200/400 - now multiply that times 3 or 4. I dont think i could keep up with it and be sure that I'm making solid decisions.

As far as how to play if you're playing multiple tourneys I'd say that your 'tight is right' assessment is dead-on. If you've got 4 tables to keep track of, I would think that ONLY premium hands would merit entering a pot.

The bad thing about that is I personally like to raise on the button/late with good-marginal hands like KQs, KJs, ATs, etc. but moves like that aren't going to work unless you're paying attention to the other people at the table. I would think that's damn near impossible with 4 tables at once.

Regarding money, I lost, lost, lost and lost when I tried 3 or 4 tabling. Two tabling produces average results for me, but I get my highest ROI in the long term when i concentrate solely on one table and give myself the chance to make good reads across the table.

Hope this helps!
View user's profile Send private message
ender555
Post Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 2:03pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 31 Mar 2005
Posts: 647
WPP: 126

Thanks, very informative.
View user's profile Send private message
BigmacAg
Post Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 2:25pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Two Pair
Two Pair

Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 29
WPP: 95

you may want to stagger the start of SnGs if you are planning on playing more than one. If you wait two or three blind levels, you should be able to get a general feeling for a table and then start up another one.
View user's profile Send private message
aokrongly
Post Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 2:34pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 863
WPP: 161

definately stagger the start. I was once heads up on 3 tables at the same time. It'll make your eyes cross. And you can only play this way, imo, if you're playing auto-pilot poker. You'll get no reads because you won't be there to see what people do with what cards and situations.
View user's profile Send private message
eeeee
Post Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 7:05pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 906
WPP: 92
Location: SoCal
BigmacAg wrote:
you may want to stagger the start of SnGs if you are planning on playing more than one.
I agree with this.
I've recently been reading on another FTR thread of ex-StarCraft hyper-multi-tablers who're playing high stakes on 4 or 5 tables and 3 or 4 more hi-dollar SNG's. It inspired me to stretch a little more -- I'd been multi-tabling ring games, but always dropped to single table when in an SNG. I got two second places playing two tables, but my staggering nearly didn't work, as one table caught up to the other and passed it. I helped to focus on the more short-handed table for reads and to stay tighter on the secondary table, trying less bluffing/stealing/early-position-hijinx. It worked in the end, but I am not going to try again until my ADD flares up again Wink

Also, if it doesn't work as well, maybe mix an early stage SNG with a ring game or two? Then you can sit out of the ring games when the SNG advances.
View user's profile Send private message
aleksandr
Post Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 8:23pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Flush
Flush

Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 305
WPP: 113

If you want to increase your profitability, and you think you can do it by playing ABC poker in several SNGs, I'd say move up a buy-in instead. Same level of profit increase, and your game improves much more.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ender555
Post Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 8:37pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 31 Mar 2005
Posts: 647
WPP: 126

I think i agree aleksander....

Although today i have been doing 2 successfully..

2 firsts, then 2 seconds, then 2 losses...

So I moved up to 10 dollar and have won my first one there. I think just moving up a buy in is the best way to increase profit if you are a lower stakes player..

However I will continue to play multi-table because i find myself playing autopilot poker lots even at one table. Generally i have found that being tight early on people usually notice, and then it's really easy to bluff because people already see u as tight. This strategy has been working really well for me today.

Once my bankroll affords 20's ill go back down to 1 table at a time
View user's profile Send private message
Sykedupp
Post Posted: Fri, 01 Apr 2005, 2:40am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Flush
Flush

Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 475
WPP: 95
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I usually autopilot, because I'm usually learning more on here then I could on the table (until shorthanded of course)

-Chris
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
DavSimon
Post Posted: Fri, 01 Apr 2005, 11:32am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 813
WPP: 145
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Your question inspired me to add a section to the SnG Strategy Guide on multi-tabling: http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=75594#75594

Section 9 is the new multi-table section
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT - 5 Hours

  >    > 

small SnG tactics...

  

Post new topic   Reply to topic


 
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot rate topics in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by .  Forum style based on NoseBleed by mikelothar.com.   

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.