| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Mon, 28 Mar 2005, 5:48pm Post subject: Half blinds starting hand adjustments? |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95 WPP: 116
|
|
Hi all,
Before I discovered this site I played a mixture of limit and NL at various stakes but wasn't very consistent. After discovering this site I decided to focus my live game energy on 2/4 limit and my online game time on .50/1 limit. I've now spent about 3 months hammering my local 2/4 game and I've decided to move up to 4/8 (BR is fine for 4/8).
One of the interesting differences in the 4/8 game at my local place is that the blinds are $1 and $2. That means you can limp into a hand for $2, or raise it to $6. I've only played that game 3 times now, but when the table is passive there seem to be lots of opportunities to see a flop for the $2 minimum. Does this mean I should limp with more hands than usual? The game overall is relatively tight (3-5 players max seeing the flop), so suited connectors and Axs types of hands are actually questionable in terms of pot odds, but I'm wondering if the cheap price to see the flop actually increases your implied odds enough to make limping with things like 45s profitable.
What I've been doing to this point is limping with the marginal hands and throwing them away if someone raises. In a normal blind structure game I would only fold to a single raise after limping preflop in really rare circumstances, but it seems to me in this game it might make more sense to play this way. Any thoughts?
Oh, btw, I've really been trying to take position into account on the 2/4 game, but it never seemed to matter much because the tables were so passive. In the 4/8 game I'm seeing how important position is and I'm glad I practiced being aware of it at 2/4.
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 28 Mar 2005, 5:51pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17119 WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| You certainly should be playing 22-55 UTG in this game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 28 Mar 2005, 5:55pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95 WPP: 116
|
|
Ok, I've been playing a bit too tight. I'm out of position in this case so I'm risking a raise behind me -- do I call it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 28 Mar 2005, 6:00pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17119 WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| Brodie wrote: | Ok, I've been playing a bit too tight. I'm out of position in this case so I'm risking a raise behind me -- do I call it? |
Pocket pairs 22-55 are *very* close UTG in most games. You're getting a $2 discount even when you have to call off $4 more. At that price they MUST be profitable. I would certainly be playing all sorts of sooted semi-connected crap on the button for $2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 28 Mar 2005, 6:35pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95 WPP: 116
|
|
Thanks Fnord, I'll make those adjustments and go ahead and start playing a few more hands.
Normally I hate limping on the button...any hand that I would normally play I tend to play for a raise on the button. But with the half blinds you think it makes sense to limp with sketchy hands in case you hit something? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 28 Mar 2005, 7:31pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17119 WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| Brodie wrote: |
Normally I hate limping on the button...any hand that I would normally play I tend to play for a raise on the button. But with the half blinds you think it makes sense to limp with sketchy hands in case you hit something? |
Yes, consider that thier favorite mistake is calling too much post-flop (particularly in small pots.) I often just limp with hands like ATo for this reason... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 29 Mar 2005, 7:34am Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 215 WPP: 75
|
|
| 3-5 players seeing the flop in a 2/4 B&M game is a freakin' pipe dream at my local casino. It's more like 5-7 usually. Where do you play? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 29 Mar 2005, 7:50am Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 130 WPP: 112
|
|
| hagakure wrote: | | 3-5 players seeing the flop in a 2/4 B&M game is a freakin' pipe dream at my local casino. It's more like 5-7 usually. Where do you play? |
A pipe dream? Give me 5-7 loose passive B&M players every hand... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 29 Mar 2005, 9:43am Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 215 WPP: 75
|
|
| Tripps7 wrote: | | hagakure wrote: | | 3-5 players seeing the flop in a 2/4 B&M game is a freakin' pipe dream at my local casino. It's more like 5-7 usually. Where do you play? |
A pipe dream? Give me 5-7 loose passive B&M players every hand... |
Not quite. We're talking 5-7 players that will hold on to 34o and catch some amazingly lucky runners to put you in the dirt. That's the danger of 2/4, idiots that dont know when to get rid of bad hands and they hit on the river.
I know as well as you do that that is just part of the game, im just saying that it isnt as good a situation as it sounds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 29 Mar 2005, 9:05pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95 WPP: 116
|
|
Yeah, I would prefer if the game were looser. The 2/4 game certainly is and I've done really well there over the last few months, but I'm hoping the combination of the slightly better players at 4/8 and tighter average table doesn't kill me. I've tightened up considerably during this transition (I'm about 17% VP$IP online and I would guess about the same at 2/4 -- but since moving up to 4/8 I've been trying to keep my variance low by tightening up even more), but I'm about to start adding these hands that Fnord recommended (at the risk of a bit more variance, I'm sure).
One of the really nice things about a very loose table is that it covers up a few of your mistakes (draws that would be seriously -EV in a tight game can get close to even money in a loose game). And while it sucks to get drawn out on, a lot of times you do the drawing out on people and that's fun.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 29 Mar 2005, 9:40pm Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 215 WPP: 75
|
|
| Brodie what casino are you playing in? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 29 Mar 2005, 10:19pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 1132 WPP: 109
Location: People let me tell you about my best friends...
|
|
| hagakure wrote: | | Tripps7 wrote: | | hagakure wrote: | | 3-5 players seeing the flop in a 2/4 B&M game is a freakin' pipe dream at my local casino. It's more like 5-7 usually. Where do you play? |
A pipe dream? Give me 5-7 loose passive B&M players every hand... |
Not quite. We're talking 5-7 players that will hold on to 34o and catch some amazingly lucky runners to put you in the dirt. That's the danger of 2/4, idiots that dont know when to get rid of bad hands and they hit on the river.
I know as well as you do that that is just part of the game, im just saying that it isnt as good a situation as it sounds. |
Now that's just silly... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Mar 2005, 7:12am Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 215 WPP: 75
|
|
| Chicago_Kid wrote: | | hagakure wrote: | | Tripps7 wrote: | | hagakure wrote: | | 3-5 players seeing the flop in a 2/4 B&M game is a freakin' pipe dream at my local casino. It's more like 5-7 usually. Where do you play? |
A pipe dream? Give me 5-7 loose passive B&M players every hand... |
Not quite. We're talking 5-7 players that will hold on to 34o and catch some amazingly lucky runners to put you in the dirt. That's the danger of 2/4, idiots that dont know when to get rid of bad hands and they hit on the river.
I know as well as you do that that is just part of the game, im just saying that it isnt as good a situation as it sounds. |
Now that's just silly... |
what is? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Mar 2005, 8:01am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3037 WPP: 95
|
|
I think he means being afraid of multiple limpers is silly. Of course it's as good as it sounds. I hear this time and time again. Your not alone. A lot of people are frightened by a loose table with an increased suck out ratio.
When your at a table like this, to me you have to focus more on your own cards. I know that sounds weird, but your now playing for value. Only put your money in the middle when you have a great hand or your drawing to a great hand. TPTK is less powerful. Just make the appropriate adjustments and you'll dominate.
Have you ever played Super-Hold Em? It's like hold-em, except you are dealt three down cards. I play it with friends when it gets down to three handed, so that we can encourage action. It's great practice for loose games. You either have a straight or better brewing, or you fold to any heavy betting. I'm not saying it's exactly the same thing, but it's along the same lines as playing an extremely loose suck out game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 Mar 2005, 7:11pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95 WPP: 116
|
|
Hagakure:
It's just a local card room, not a casino... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 5:07am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 914 WPP: 111
|
|
| Quote: | | 3-5 players seeing the flop in a 2/4 B&M game is a freakin' pipe dream at my local casino. It's more like 5-7 usually. |
I deal at the place hagakure is talking about, have dealt to him many hours already. The 2/4 and 3/6 games he is talking about are extremely loose. Way looser than the .50/1.00 game at Party.
A lot of these idiots will call down with horrible kickers, bottom pair, etc. It is true that you want these calls, but when you have them all calling at once, one of them will improve to some crazy 2 pair or three of a kind.
Individually these players are benign, but when they get together, they are a force to be reckoned with.
I think the "value call" that we have gotten used to in online limit loses value in extremely loose games. Being able to pick up reads on what your opps have is EXTREMELY important.
I would definitely open up my 3-bet range in these games, and do a ton of check raising on the flop when flopping top pair/decent kicker. The fish love to call, but even the fish don't like to cold call 2 bets. You can probably maximize this by choosing the correct seat at the table, so that you are out of position on someone that likes to bet out at a lot of flops. Get that person on your right and you can use them to run isolation plays on the rest of the table.
I'm still not convinced that 2/4 and 3/6 can be beat because of the oppressive rake at these limits.
You definitley should try and get up to 4/8 as soon as you can. The 4/8 games there are really good. There are several players in the room that play an FTR style game and they almost never lose.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 8:12am Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 215 WPP: 75
|
|
| Lonnie wrote: | | Quote: | | 3-5 players seeing the flop in a 2/4 B&M game is a freakin' pipe dream at my local casino. It's more like 5-7 usually. |
I deal at the place hagakure is talking about, have dealt to him many hours already. The 2/4 and 3/6 games he is talking about are extremely loose. Way looser than the .50/1.00 game at Party.
A lot of these idiots will call down with horrible kickers, bottom pair, etc. It is true that you want these calls, but when you have them all calling at once, one of them will improve to some crazy 2 pair or three of a kind.
Individually these players are benign, but when they get together, they are a force to be reckoned with.
I think the "value call" that we have gotten used to in online limit loses value in extremely loose games. Being able to pick up reads on what your opps have is EXTREMELY important.
I would definitely open up my 3-bet range in these games, and do a ton of check raising on the flop when flopping top pair/decent kicker. The fish love to call, but even the fish don't like to cold call 2 bets. You can probably maximize this by choosing the correct seat at the table, so that you are out of position on someone that likes to bet out at a lot of flops. Get that person on your right and you can use them to run isolation plays on the rest of the table.
I'm still not convinced that 2/4 and 3/6 can be beat because of the oppressive rake at these limits.
You definitley should try and get up to 4/8 as soon as you can. The 4/8 games there are really good. There are several players in the room that play an FTR style game and they almost never lose.... |
You're reading my mind man...see my PM.
You know who came to mind when I read that? That guy they call toast. The last time I played with him I watched him just about triple his initial buy in playing absolute crap, then lose all but about 1/4 of it by the end of the night. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 12:12pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 1296 WPP: 54
|
|
| Mike Caro discourages check raising in a game like this, where people are just "having fun". It makes you an unfriendly player in a friendly game, and makes it harder for them to give you thier chips. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 6:08pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17119 WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| Isn't schooling fun? Turns a bunch of really bad calls into marginally bad calls. TPTK-like hands go way down in value in these games. Sets and strong flush draws are where it's at. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 8:45pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 29 Apr 2004
Posts: 1918 WPP: 120
Location: St. Louis
|
|
| Is it really 4/8 with 1/2 blinds or is it 1-4-8-8 spread limit? While they seem basically the same, there are enough nuances to spread limit to screw you over if you play your standard limit game. Like Fnord mentioned, you should limp in with small pocket pairs in EP that you might otherwise fold with larger blinds. You have to be more careful with draws though because there will be 1/2 he amount of money in the pot going to the flop as there would be if the blinds were 2/4. If 5 people limp into and see the flop and then someone bets $4 ($14 total pot minus rake) your 4 flush doesn't look as near as nice as when the pot is the $24 it would normally be. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 01 Apr 2005, 1:46am Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95 WPP: 116
|
|
Right, that's one of the things I was concerned about. I'm going to give limping with more hands a shot this weekend, though.
And yep, it really is 4/8 with half blinds. Weird, I know. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 01 Apr 2005, 3:05am Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17119 WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| DaNutsInYoEye wrote: | | If 5 people limp into and see the flop and then someone bets $4 ($14 total pot minus rake) your 4 flush doesn't look as near as nice as when the pot is the $24 it would normally be. |
It does it they still call like lemmings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|