Poker Forum

Poker Forum

HOTFTR 5 Year $300 Freeroll on Full Tilt Dec 4th + FTR Gear! Poker Forum  Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember Me         Forgot Password

  >    > 

Who lays this down?

  
Page 1 of 1  ||  Post new topic  |  Post reply


What is the play?
Call
10%
 10%  [ 6 ]
Fold
18%
 18%  [ 10 ]
Raise All in ($300)
70%
 70%  [ 39 ]
Total Votes : 55

Author Message
Demiparadigm
Post Posted: Wed, 23 Mar 2005, 9:52pm    Post subject: Who lays this down? Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 09 Feb 2005
Posts: 1602
WPP: 105
Location: Party 6 max
I was recently in a hand very similar to an example in Harrington's book.

This is how it went down:

$300 Max buy in $3/$5 blinds.

My table image is very tight. I have played 3 of the last 25 hands, took 2 down on the flop, and showed QQ when I folded on a AKJ flop.

I am dealt KK in EP. Raise to $25

MP player (Tight Agressive) calls. BB (weak) calls.

The pot is $75 after $3 rake

Flop is 885 with 2 clubs. I have the K of clubs.

I bet $50.
MP Raises $150 to $200
BB calls all in for $80

Action is to me.

There is no way I think a TA player called my EP raise of 5x BB with an 8 or 5. The BB could have anything.


Last edited by Demiparadigm on Wed, 23 Mar 2005, 10:03pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message
a500lbgorilla
Post Posted: Wed, 23 Mar 2005, 10:00pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
LAME HUMOR THAT MAKES FISH LAUGH
LAME HUMOR THAT MAKES FISH LAUGH

Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 7851
WPP: 68
Location: This room is a good place to be
Is the TAgg tricky?

-'rilla
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Demiparadigm
Post Posted: Wed, 23 Mar 2005, 10:02pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 09 Feb 2005
Posts: 1602
WPP: 105
Location: Party 6 max
A little tricky.
View user's profile Send private message
michael1123
Post Posted: Wed, 23 Mar 2005, 10:38pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 1720
WPP: 297
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
All in, probably. I'm not sure if you'll win the main pot, but I have to think you're a favorite in the bigger (if he calls) side pot. I'd assume he has a flush draw or high pocket pair, which could be AA, but more likely would be a lower pair than your kings. Considering you're probably the favorite to win the side pot and still have a decent shot in the main one, I think you gotta go with it.
View user's profile Send private message
Greedo017
Post Posted: Wed, 23 Mar 2005, 11:41pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 1461
WPP: 122
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
that's tough. i think though, you'll at least win the side pot a majority of the time, and some of the time you'll grab the whole thing, i think you'll win enough of it enough of the time to make it a good call.
View user's profile Send private message
ilikeaces86
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 12:05am    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 2036
WPP: 142
Location: http://ilikeaces86.blogspot.com/
whats to say he doesnt have the 8 or 55? Playing against a player such as yourself I would make the call with 55 or 78suited all day to your raise and those stacks.
View user's profile Send private message
dalecooper
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 9:32am    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 3089
WPP: 159

Agreed - you could be looking at pocket 5s or the surprise suited connectors like 78, 89. BB could have an 8 possibly. I think on the basis of whether you'd likely win or lose, I'd fold here - someone has you beat. But I didn't go through and calculate the pot odds, which at a glance look awfully tempting. You might have to call even though you think you're behind, just on the chance that you're not behind.
View user's profile Send private message
m3laNcholy
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 10:06am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight
Straight

Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 232
WPP: 110

Yeah 78s 89s and (less likely) pocket 5s would scare the $@% out of me. Probably would fold that one.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Greedo017
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 12:44pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 1461
WPP: 122
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
i kindof go back and forth on this. its really hard to say who of them has you beat or not. but, i still am thinking that you're gonna catch lower overpairs and bluffs with high card flush draws etc more than you're gonna see the 55 or an 8. i'd still push.
View user's profile Send private message
Tenny
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 1:33pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
3-of-a-Kind
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 86
WPP: 50

Unless the TA player has pocket 9's or 10's, has you on AK figures you missed the flop and can bet you off your hand.
View user's profile Send private message
Grand_MasterB
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 3:29pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Flush
Flush

Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 466
WPP: 94
Location: Cincinnati
i would say 8 out of ten times your hand is money...raise those bastards back!
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Admerylous
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 4:31pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
3-of-a-Kind
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Posts: 108
WPP: 48
Location: Delaware
This was so hard for me. In the end I reraise all-in.

It depends more so on the read. Is he tricky in the starting hands he will play, or tricky in his betting patterns? Or both?

This, like many things, becomes very read dependant.

I am dying to know the result, regardless.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Demiparadigm
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 6:47pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 09 Feb 2005
Posts: 1602
WPP: 105
Location: Party 6 max
Dan Harrington says it is often correct to call with a hand as weak as AQ if the BB was the one who raised. It is often a bluff.

In My experience this is almost always a pocket pair above the board. I figured I was looking at a medium pair from the TAgg, and most likely a draw from the BB. Since the BB only had to call $80 The pot was laying great odds for a flush.

My bet looks like just a standard continuation bet after an EP raise.

Given my read, I raised all in.

The TAgg showed AA and the BB QJ of clubs.

The AA held up for a big pot, and I went back into my wallet to start all over.
Although I lost this pot, I think the reraise is the correct play.

Now what if the action were the same and you held two red Jacks?
What about AK of clubs?

I would have probably folded each of these hands, because of the call from the BB. With JJ you could more often be dominated, and with AK, it is possible that a number of your outs are dead.

What do you think?
View user's profile Send private message
bspahn
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 7:04pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Flush
Flush

Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 346
WPP: 151

tough one but most of the time i'd say you take it down.

most people will raise you with a higher pp than on board, thinking you have AK etc (since you bet 2/3 pot screams semi-bluff), most of the time you'll be against a flush draw in this case, or a pp below yours and you have to call.

the tricky part about this player was that he didnt re-raise preflop which non-tricky players would likely do.
View user's profile Send private message
eeeee
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 7:12pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 906
WPP: 92
Location: SoCal
Tough call. If it was $10 buy in, I'd be all in, so $300 needs to be the same, right?
You may have become predictable in your play, and someone else almost always could have a better hand, but just on value you have to play.



EDIT: Oh, I missed the TAg part. Embarassed


Last edited by eeeee on Sat, 26 Mar 2005, 4:15pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message
Greedo017
Post Posted: Thu, 24 Mar 2005, 9:32pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 1461
WPP: 122
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
i think you did fine. if he had played it aggressive preflop you'd have ended up all-in anyway.
View user's profile Send private message
DoGGz
Post Posted: Fri, 25 Mar 2005, 2:15am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Guest



WPP: 124

eeeee wrote:
Tough call. If it was $10 buy in, I'd be all in, so $300 needs to be the same, right?
You may have become predictable in your play, and someone else almost always could have a better hand, but just on value you have to play.


Correct, if you are going to play higher then your stakes dictate you still have your play your game
Rondavu
Post Posted: Fri, 25 Mar 2005, 1:02pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3037
WPP: 95

I would have folded this all day long, no questions asked, no agony. The strength of his bet almost telegraphs AA. I think if he has QQ or JJ he isn't so confident with the raise. Maybe in that case he raises to 100 so he can gather information. I'm just saying if you have QQ your somewhat weary of KK or AA, and your not gonna do what he did unless you thought "Screw it I think I'm ahead and that's that". It seems unlikely he would think that way at these stakes however. We're talking about hundreds of dollars. No, I think he was quite certain he was ahead in this one.

As for rationalizing that you should call because "Most of the time kings are good here", that's not poker to me. Each hand is it's own, and each read is it's own. Whether they win a lot of times or not, they in fact were not good here, and the progression of the hand telegraphed it soundly in my humble opinion.
View user's profile Send private message
michael1123
Post Posted: Sat, 26 Mar 2005, 2:11am    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 1720
WPP: 297
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Wee, I called the AA as the hand to be worried about from the TA player.
View user's profile Send private message
ensign_lee
Post Posted: Sat, 26 Mar 2005, 1:48pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Starfleet's Finest
Starfleet's Finest

Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2081
WPP: 113
Location: The University of TEXAS at Austin
I raise all in. painfully...but I still raise.

TA is not gong to be playing for implied odds, not to mention screwed up implied odds as $50 is 1/6 of your stack, so even if he calls with a 5 5, the implied odds aren't there.

I put him sitting happy on queens or jacks, trying to push you out of the pot.

Sucks that it ended up being AA, but I have to say no folding here.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
EddieBoy
Post Posted: Sat, 26 Mar 2005, 2:27pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight
Straight

Joined: 13 Mar 2004
Posts: 125
WPP: 46
Location: Corona California
You got 2 players in front of you who'v put all their money in the middle, why wouldn't you put one of them on Aces? Also, one of the was labeled as tight-aggressive, I think this is an easy fold.
View user's profile Send private message
Greedo017
Post Posted: Sun, 27 Mar 2005, 2:09am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 1461
WPP: 122
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
"why wouldn't you put one of them on Aces?"

no preflop reraise. i guess in the end that was a nice play.
View user's profile Send private message
EddieBoy
Post Posted: Sun, 27 Mar 2005, 2:29am    Post subject: Re: Who lays this down? Reply with quote
Straight
Straight

Joined: 13 Mar 2004
Posts: 125
WPP: 46
Location: Corona California
Quote:

I am dealt KK in EP. Raise to $25

MP player (Tight Agressive) calls. BB (weak) calls.

The pot is $75 after $3 rake

Flop is 885 with 2 clubs. I have the K of clubs.
Action is to me.


There's a preflop raise of 25 bucks with two callers...you don't put one of them on an Ace?[/quote]
View user's profile Send private message
Sykedupp
Post Posted: Sun, 27 Mar 2005, 2:33am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Flush
Flush

Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 475
WPP: 95
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
he probably puts them on an ace, just not rockets.... an ace loses to his KK... rockets win

-Chris
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Rondavu
Post Posted: Mon, 28 Mar 2005, 1:42pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3037
WPP: 95

Fold Fold Fold

Three more votes for Fold

nope four
View user's profile Send private message
Admerylous
Post Posted: Tue, 29 Mar 2005, 3:21am    Post subject: Reply with quote
3-of-a-Kind
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Posts: 108
WPP: 48
Location: Delaware
Sykedupp wrote:
he probably puts them on an ace, just not rockets.... an ace loses to his KK... rockets win

-Chris


Huh? Are you reading his KK with is original flop of AKJ where he folded QQ? Question
View user's profile