| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sat, 14 Jun 2008, 1:04am Post subject: Standard? |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 521
WPP: 46
|
|
PokerStars Game #18124776150: Tournament #92003930, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2008/06/14 - 04:00:20 (ET)
Table '92003930 1' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 2: TAURUSsia (3870 in chips)
Seat 3: davei86 (2440 in chips)
Seat 4: walkon84 (1170 in chips)
Seat 5: Hero (2150 in chips)
Seat 6: machine2678 (3870 in chips)
walkon84: posts small blind 75
Majin Legacy: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Hero [5s 5d]
machine2678: calls 150
TAURUSsia: folds
davei86: calls 150
walkon84: calls 75
Hero: raises 2000 to 2150 and is all-in
Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 14 Jun 2008, 3:52am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 364
WPP: 189
Location: UK
|
|
| I don't like this push. I would just check here and hope to flop a set. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 14 Jun 2008, 6:22am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 521
WPP: 46
|
|
| Too low of a pair? What would you need here to justify a push? 88+? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 14 Jun 2008, 6:59am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 364
WPP: 189
Location: UK
|
|
| It would depend on how the table had been playing, but at a $5.50 with 3 other players in the pot, I may only push here with 99/TT+ and maybe AQ+, something like that. I wouldn't push with 88 here either, but maybe I am being too tight. 88 may be a good push if the table had been tight, but seeing as there are already 3 others in the pot, it doesn't seem to be. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 14 Jun 2008, 7:55am Post subject: |
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 7807
WPP: 135
Location: Sydney
|
|
I would definitely shove 88 in this spot and possibly 77 as well. The only time I wouldn't shove is if I had a good read that UTG limped monsters UTG (ie. I had seen it previously and also that he raised weaker hands rather than limping).
Whilst you should have good fold equity by shoving here, the fact that three players limped dramatically increases the chance that somebody will call - either the big stacked UTG or the short stacked SB. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 14 Jun 2008, 9:07am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 364
WPP: 189
Location: UK
|
|
| taipan168 wrote: | | I would definitely shove 88 in this spot and possibly 77 as well. |
I just put this hand into SNGWIZ. If you put it in as it is, you get the following: "Error: This game cannot be analyzed because it is likely that more than 2 opponents will be all-in."
If you just have 2 of the 3 callers though and mess around with their ranges, the pushing point seems to be around 77 or 88, as you said. I was slightly off in my estimations.
Would the extra caller make much difference to what hands you would push here? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 14 Jun 2008, 10:59am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 1342
WPP: 87
Location: Just runnin...
|
|
im shoving 77+AJ+
i would shove 55 if i had like..... less than 8bb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
