|
|
Poker Forum
|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Thu, 15 May 2008, 7:42am Post subject: completing the Sb |
|
|
High Card
Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Posts: 7
WPP: 105
|
|
| I know that completing the sb is a chip leak for beginners thinking there already half way in. My question is is it really that bad of strategy for live 200nl. In a unraised pot at the minimum you are getting at least 10 to 1 odds on your money even with hands that really dot have that much value it doesn't seem like a bad play. Is this the correct way to think? Is it still bad strategy? If it is still bad strategy what are some reasons? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 15 May 2008, 7:50am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 1213
WPP: 88
|
|
I complete anything from the SB that has decent implied odds like SCs, Axs, Kxs, PPs.
I wouldn't just limp anything though. Playing hands like A3o OOP is horrible.
I also limp hands that I don't really like raising from the SB with a bunch of limpers in like ATo, AJo, which are also terrible to play OOP, so I dunno how good that is, I just can't bear to lay em' down.
I think the problem with limping too much is reverse implied odds with junk like A3o. Hell...maybe even ATo is a reverse implied odds situation in a tighter game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 7 Hours |
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot rate topics in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by
.
Forum style based on NoseBleed by mikelothar.com.
|
