| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sun, 11 May 2008, 1:58pm Post subject: LC: 5 way AI PF 1st hand
|
 |
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 4154
WPP: 65
Location: Stars $16 and $27 Sngs
|
|
PokerStars Game #17357151324: Tournament #87984972, $11+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2008/05/11 - 14:55:08 (ET)
Table '87984972 19' 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: UBERMENSCH84 (1500 in chips)
Seat 2: gulogulo1 (1420 in chips)
Seat 3: mike4iu (1480 in chips)
Seat 4: Forty2u (1500 in chips)
Seat 5: polodelph (1600 in chips)
Seat 6: Roxiejean (1500 in chips)
Seat 7: CLASSE43 (1500 in chips)
Seat 8: Shyann71 (1500 in chips)
Seat 9: tigercatten (1500 in chips)
mike4iu: posts small blind 10
Forty2u: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Forty2u [Ad Ah]
polodelph: folds
Roxiejean: folds
CLASSE43: raises 100 to 120
Shyann71: folds
tigercatten: raises 100 to 220
UBERMENSCH84: calls 220
gulogulo1: calls 220
mike4iu: folds
Forty2u: raises 380 to 600
CLASSE43: raises 900 to 1500 and is all-in
tigercatten: calls 1280 and is all-in
UBERMENSCH84: calls 1280 and is all-in
gulogulo1: calls 1200 and is all-in
Forty2u: calls 900 and is all-in
*** FLOP *** [Ac 4c 9h]
*** TURN *** [Ac 4c 9h] [9s]
*** RIVER *** [Ac 4c 9h 9s] [7s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Forty2u: shows [Ad Ah] (a full house, Aces full of Nines)
CLASSE43: shows [5h 5d] (two pair, Nines and Fives)
tigercatten: shows [4s 4h] (a full house, Fours full of Nines)
UBERMENSCH84: shows [Ks As] (two pair, Aces and Nines)
Forty2u collected 320 from side pot
gulogulo1: shows [7c 7h] (a full house, Sevens full of Nines)
Forty2u collected 7110 from main pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 7430 Main pot 7110. Side pot 320. | Rake 0
Board [Ac 4c 9h 9s 7s]
Seat 1: UBERMENSCH84 showed [Ks As] and lost with two pair, Aces and Nines
Seat 2: gulogulo1 (button) showed [7c 7h] and lost with a full house, Sevens full of Nines
Seat 3: mike4iu (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Forty2u (big blind) showed [Ad Ah] and won (7430) with a full house, Aces full of Nines
Seat 5: polodelph folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: Roxiejean folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: CLASSE43 showed [5h 5d] and lost with two pair, Nines and Fives
Seat 8: Shyann71 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: tigercatten showed [4s 4h] and lost with a full house, Fours full of Nines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 11 May 2008, 3:32pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 1910
WPP: 66
Location: Richmond, VA
|
|
| fold pre because when there are 4 others your equity goes down |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 11 May 2008, 4:47pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 8199
WPP: 133
Location: Sydney
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 11 May 2008, 4:59pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 473
WPP: 159
Location: UK
|
|
| Why did you not just push pre-flop? Why only raise to 600 when there is already over 800 in the pot, especially as it is already multiway? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 11 May 2008, 5:15pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 1483
WPP: 79
|
|
| kmind wrote: | | fold pre because when there are 4 others your equity goes down |
Jokes I hope... This isn't a bubble situation so it comes down to number of chips. Would you rather have 81.3% of 3000 or 41.5% of 7500? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 11 May 2008, 9:10pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 100
WPP: 97
Location: Pennsylvania
|
|
What a great way to start out haha.
If that was me I woulda been a little nervous with that many people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 11 May 2008, 9:12pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 328
WPP: 137
Location: Norfolk, UK.
|
|
Nice start 
Least said about the others the better. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 11 May 2008, 9:47pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 8199
WPP: 133
Location: Sydney
|
|
| Rage2100 wrote: | | Why did you not just push pre-flop? Why only raise to 600 when there is already over 800 in the pot, especially as it is already multiway? |
I don't mind the less than AI raise, we don't mind getting action when we have AA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 11 May 2008, 10:26pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 4154
WPP: 65
Location: Stars $16 and $27 Sngs
|
|
| taipan168 wrote: | | Rage2100 wrote: | | Why did you not just push pre-flop? Why only raise to 600 when there is already over 800 in the pot, especially as it is already multiway? |
I don't mind the less than AI raise, we don't mind getting action when we have AA | From my (little) experience in these tournaments ($12 180 players) there are always a few people who wants to get knocked out in the first orbit, I was pretty sure someone would push over. However I did not expect 5 AIs
I also did not mind getting action, pushing any flop, there is a lot of value for building a big stack early in those tournaments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 12 May 2008, 8:48am Post subject:
|
|
|
Season VII
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 2409
WPP: 101
Location: HotLanta
|
|
But the real question is how did you end up doing in the tourney?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 12 May 2008, 11:00am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 4154
WPP: 65
Location: Stars $16 and $27 Sngs
|
|
| 4th out of 180 if I recall correctly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 12 May 2008, 5:09pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 8199
WPP: 133
Location: Sydney
|
|
| TLR wrote: | | I also did not mind getting action, pushing any flop, there is a lot of value for building a big stack early in those tournaments |
I agree, in a MTT there is a lot of value in building a big stack early, particularly in a turbo tourney like this where having a big stack puts you way ahead of the fast increasing blinds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 12 May 2008, 5:25pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 473
WPP: 159
Location: UK
|
|
| TLR wrote: | | From my (little) experience in these tournaments ($12 180 players) there are always a few people who wants to get knocked out in the first orbit, I was pretty sure someone would push over. However I did not expect 5 AIs |
I did not realise it was a 180-man SnG. 
I have started to play a few 2 and 3 table SnGs and they do seem a lot looser than single table SnGs. 5 all-ins is pretty impressive though! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 13 May 2008, 12:26am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 4154
WPP: 65
Location: Stars $16 and $27 Sngs
|
|
| Rage2100 wrote: | | TLR wrote: | | From my (little) experience in these tournaments ($12 180 players) there are always a few people who wants to get knocked out in the first orbit, I was pretty sure someone would push over. However I did not expect 5 AIs |
I did not realise it was a 180-man SnG.
I have started to play a few 2 and 3 table SnGs and they do seem a lot looser than single table SnGs. 5 all-ins is pretty impressive though! | Yeah, I forgot to mention it was a 180 seater, they tend to be pretty loose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTR500: Full Tilt $500 Money-Added Monthly Tourney, Dec 5th
