| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 12:14pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 1095 WPP: 142
|
|
couple things that I don't think are being taken into account Re: using CC's to pay bills.
First, you realize that cash advances on CC's start to accrue interest immediately. And usually at a higher rate than purchases. So, you are starting off taking a hit there.
Second, by adding monthly CC bills to the occasion you are increasing your monthly expenses, or X, right off the bat. With the small starting bankroll this spells disaster.
Also, thinking long term. You will be stunting the growth of your bankroll by having to constantly withdraw from it. This stunts your progression up stakes, and stunts your potential earn. This could set you back a year or more from where you could be if you waited until properly rolled to take a shot at going pro.
If, instead of going pro immediately, you worked your soul-sucking job for 6 months while building a roll and moving up in stakes, you could conceivably be playing 100NL properly rolled, and earning much more than $20/hr. At that time, going pro can be done more easily. You should be able to have enough in reserve to cover a few months, while still having the bankroll to play properly.
By taking the shot too early and bringing in credit cards, you would severely reduce your chances of making a long-term living off of poker, and would increase your chances of going busto, and having CC debt to work off at your new $8/hr job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 12:32pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 2838 WPP: 106
Location: #flopturnriver
|
|
Consider the following.
If a decent 25nl player started playing 25nl with about a $500 bankroll and ran 4.5 ptbb/100 over 30k hands, he will have around $1175. Getting 900 hands/hour (16-tabling) yields $20.25/hour. This fits the profile of the Hero we have mentioned in the original post. Over those 30k hands of 25nl, he or she will have stats similar to this:
35 hours played
4.5 ptbb/100 winrate
32 ptbb/100 standard deviation
What level of confidence can we have that Hero is a winning player?
Answer: No more than 59%.
So we have a 40% chance of going back to our $9/hour job with credit card debt.
| pgil wrote: | | If, instead of going pro immediately, you worked your soul-sucking job for 6 months while building a roll and moving up in stakes, you could conceivably be playing 100NL properly rolled, and earning much more than $20/hr. At that time, going pro can be done more easily. You should be able to have enough in reserve to cover a few months, while still having the bankroll to play properly. |
This is the correct reply and thus concludes the thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 12:35pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Almost as bad as that idiot heybude

Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 2741 WPP: 72
|
|
| by bills do you mean cost of living? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 12:46pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 2838 WPP: 106
Location: #flopturnriver
|
|
| Massimo wrote: | | by bills do you mean cost of living? |
Yes. Cost of living would probably be a better wording for the purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 1:06pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 31 WPP: 220
|
|
I guess I misunderstood the problem. I thought we knew could beat the game at $20/hr. Your point about uncertainty in win rates is something that I think anyone considering going pro would want to think long and hard about, but I thought we assumed this out of the problem. How do you do this calculation, btw?
Also, I did not think we had the option of building our bankroll for 6 months, since we only were interested in finding the current value of X. Of course, if you have the option of waiting until you have a bigger roll with a buffer to pay bills, you definitely should.
I was imagining a player with closer to 300k hands of history that, for whatever reason, had spent most of the money he made. I also had in mind a player that was playing fewer tables with a win rate around 8ptbb/100. This player is in a vastly different situation than the player you had in mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 8:57pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 7707 WPP: 71
Location: Petra Marklund FTW ^^^^
|
|
going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 9:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 687 WPP: 134
Location: nitting some balla sleeves
|
|
Miffed is back, Miffed is back, Miffed is back!!!!!!
yo, what's crackin' Miffed? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 9:27pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 1445 WPP: 141
Location: GA
|
|
Fun one spoon. Here's my take.
Hero needs to plan only making about $5 an hour to cover expenses, so assuming 70 hours of poker per week, $350 can be life expense. The other $15 an hour goes to downswings, building bankroll, paying taxes, etc.
The other consideration is whether, if times get rough, hero can play 90 or 100 hours in a week at his best level - all while running bad. If he's running bad, he will have to keep playing well and play more hands to make ends meet.
Of course, there are safer ways, like earning $600 bucks a week for a month playing poker 30 hours while keeping the job and launching the pro career 4 weeks late. But that wasn't the question.
So X = $350 / week. Which is less than he's making now with the day job, although it appears we're assuming $9 an hour is take home pay. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 7:26am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 2838 WPP: 106
Location: #flopturnriver
|
|
In all honesty, the point of this thread was as follows.
In the past week I've heard at least 4 different people talk about how they should quit their job and "go pro" at 25nl just because over a relatively small sample they've made approximately twice at 25nl that they do at their job.
Unfortunately none of those people posted in this thread, but I'll refer them to it the next time I see them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 9:31am Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 31 WPP: 220
|
|
| Is it safe to say that you would want at the absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 12:28pm Post subject:
|
|
|
HABITUAL LINE-STEPPER

Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 5226 WPP: 74
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
| Pasta wrote: | | Is it safe to say that you would want at the absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
there is probably no ftr member, ever, who as attained either of those milestones. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 1:35pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 2838 WPP: 106
Location: #flopturnriver
|
|
| Pasta wrote: | | Is it safe to say that you would want at the absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
Why the fuck would you play that many hands of 25nl and not move up?
| Renton wrote: | | Pasta wrote: | | Is it safe to say that you would want at the absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
there is probably no ftr member, ever, who as attained either of those milestones. |
I might come close to the 400k at +4ptbb/100 at 100nl before it's over with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 3:01pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 7707 WPP: 71
Location: Petra Marklund FTW ^^^^
|
|
| Pasta wrote: | | Is it safe to say that you would want at the absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
i think a notable sample showing you earn $100 per hour is more realistic and achievable for anyone who has expectations of going pro. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 4:45pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 770 WPP: 109
Location: Watching spoon stroke his own ego
|
|
| Miffed22001 wrote: | | Pasta wrote: | | Is it safe to say that you would want at the absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
i think a notable sample showing you earn $100 per hour is more realistic and achievable for anyone who has expectations of going pro. |
As long as we can define "notable sample" (10k? 50k? 100k?) this makes the answer so much simpler.
| Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I think having a job is overrated, so the value of X is irrelevant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 5:21pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 1953 WPP: 96
Location: MOAR BETTAR
|
|
| Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 10:07pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 7707 WPP: 71
Location: Petra Marklund FTW ^^^^
|
|
| Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
do you guys ever see beyond the end of next year? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 10:55pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 1252 WPP: 83
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Renton wrote: |
there is probably no ftr member, ever, who as attained either of those milestones. |
I did closer to 6ptbb/100 over 400k hands. Sorry I don't mean to brag, but what you say is simply false. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 23 Mar 2008, 4:05am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 1953 WPP: 96
Location: MOAR BETTAR
|
|
| Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
do you guys ever see beyond the end of next year? |
yup
much beyond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 23 Mar 2008, 1:36pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 7707 WPP: 71
Location: Petra Marklund FTW ^^^^
|
|
| Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
do you guys ever see beyond the end of next year? |
yup
much beyond |
so why are you quitting to go pro now when the money you are putting away to create the rest of your life with is pitifully small, and not enough?
Going Pro is about creating savings and buying houses etc not just earning enough to pay the rent for the month like a large majority of 'pro's' on here do, except the notable exceptions ofc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 23 Mar 2008, 1:58pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 1953 WPP: 96
Location: MOAR BETTAR
|
|
| Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
do you guys ever see beyond the end of next year? |
yup
much beyond |
so why are you quitting to go pro now when the money you are putting away to create the rest of your life with is pitifully small, and not enough?
Going Pro is about winning bigass tournaments and living the baller life etc not just earning enough to pay the rent for the month like a large majority of 'pro's' on here do, except the notable exceptions ofc | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 23 Mar 2008, 4:38pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 1619 WPP: 56
Location: Looking for my anima
|
|
| Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
do you guys ever see beyond the end of next year? |
yup
much beyond |
so why are you quitting to go pro now when the money you are putting away to create the rest of your life with is pitifully small, and not enough?
Going Pro is about creating savings and buying houses etc not just earning enough to pay the rent for the month like a large majority of 'pro's' on here do, except the notable exceptions ofc |
Yeah, I remember a thread at 2+2 about being pro and someone smart (nycballer I think) said "the best pros here will be making less than 20% of their income from poker in 10 years time". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 24 Mar 2008, 12:01am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 1888 WPP: 75
Location: Soon to be TDot
|
|
| Go pro when you feel confident enough to be able to pay for everything on a constant basis with your winnings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 9:04pm Post subject:
|
|
|
|
|