| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 3:47am Post subject: 3 bet vs Fnord, he moves in on your c-bet
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17644 WPP: 82
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
You have me at a 14% PFR over a small sample size. Table is kinda tightish with a soft spot.
Fnord probably knows you're a TAgg with an under 10% PFR.
What do you put me on here?
Call or fold?
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (9 handed) Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
Fnord ($198.35)
You ($218.40)
MP3 ($95.75)
CO ($153.05)
Button ($40)
SB ($267.35)
BB ($247.75)
UTG ($115.80)
UTG+1 ($197)
Preflop: You has K , K .
2 folds, Fnord raises to $8, You raise to $28, 5 folds, Fnord thinks... calls $20.
Flop: ($59) Q , 3 , J (2 players)
Fnord checks, You bet $42, Fnord thinks... raises to $170.35 |
Last edited by Fnord on Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 11:23am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 4:18am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 1888 WPP: 75
Location: Soon to be TDot
|
|
| I'm putting Fnord on AQ, 33, JJ+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 4:22am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 2442 WPP: 66
Location: Spewing
|
|
| AA/(QQ)/JJ/33 I fold. I think AA is most likely due to the possible hand combinations and QQ is least likely because I think you'd probs 4bet it, depending on how wide I 3bet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 6:03am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 1301 WPP: 111
Location: surfing in a room
|
|
My pfr never drops below 13% , considering that a smart Fnord wouldn´t show up w/ 33/QJ here, but has AQ/AA, JJ/QQ/AK would´ve probably been 4bet. I gamble with him.
On original scenario: Fnords raise scares the shit out of nits. Fnord has QQ/JJ well balanced w/ AK bluffs I guess and we must fold. Thats why it sucks to have an one-figure pfr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 7:45am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 1009 WPP: 59
Location: NS, Canada
|
|
i put Fnord on JJ+ and fold KK on this Q high dry flop. If i spot a tilt donkey Fnord, i'd call in this situation for sure  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 7:55am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 336 WPP: 74
Location: UK, Brighton
|
|
3 bets are rare at my pond depth.
given your position I reckon your probably raising 10% preflop. I'm curious to see if you fold AQ to the 3bet because this is probably the minimum he is 3betting you with aside from pairs? Some one who raises less than 10% preflop is going be 3 betting with less than 5% imo, which puts AQ on the edge of their range.
$270 pot $130 to call. need 33%. I think Fnords represented range is QQ or JJ which is unlikely and like the fish I am I call. Except for the fact I look him up with trash every time he fast plays because I never believe him. Also I don't get why he is shoving against what is most likely a single pair hand or wiffed AK. Seems to me like a bluff or value extraction from someone who can't fold an over pair in a 3 bet pot like me.
I can't fold. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 7:57am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 336 WPP: 74
Location: UK, Brighton
|
|
| oh yeah also my hand is the nutz, hand over the chips please. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 8:24am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Posts: 186 WPP: 66
Location: Sweden
|
|
So I'm a random nit. I 3b from utg+1, so my range here is big pairs with a few AK for bad balance.
Flop is scary, I bet, yay me. Fnord push. Given the small sample of hands I'm going to assume that Fnord has a big hand. I dont think it's +ev to try to push a rather unknown nit of his narrow range here after the 3bet.
So I should fold and I'm going to guess that Fnord has JJ.
Even if he is balancing I doubt it's going to be balanced enough to make calling the better play. Someone who aint lazy could perhaps run some numbers on that.
I think the key here is the small number of hands, but I've been wrong before. |
Last edited by Seabass on Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 2:27pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 9:26am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 1095 WPP: 142
|
|
def. think fnord would put more in pf vs. our obviously strong hand. we are too nitty to fold to it here too. So that kinda rules out AA.
QQ/JJ seem most likely, outside shot at 33/AQ/KQ/QJ. Also depends a little on if the previously mentioned soft spot is in the blinds on this hand as to the original raising requirements. Fnord might call our 3bet a little lighter knowing he is going to stack us more often than not if he hits.
I would give more creedence to a semibluff of some sort here if we had played more hands, and fnord knew we could lay down a hand postflop. given our tight nature and the small sample size, it is doubtful that he has seen us play many hands at all postflop. this leads me to rule out AK as a likely holding.
On balance, I personally would call, but that is probably a big hole in my game. I don't like folding overpairs to taggy players in reraised pots. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 9:46am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1131 WPP: 144
Location: In the Matrix
|
|
I can put Fnord on AK/AA/QQ/JJ.
AK & QQ/JJ are quite balanced, however, adding AA (notice the thinking PF and postflop) makes this a fold, I believe.
If we have a PFR of <5 then we can add 33 in Fnord's hand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 9:55am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 435 WPP: 115
Location: Chicago
|
|
| I fold. We have represented a strong hand before and on the flop, to get reraised all-in. Either he's got an overpair beat, or he's bluffing. Assuming he's doesn't have air, we're dead v. a set at worst and have even (zero) equity versus QJ at best. Fold. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 10:58am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 1622 WPP: 47
Location: Gainesville
|
|
| This is the easiest fold ever. Fnord knows what I have and wouldn't try and get some random terrible 200NL nit regular off of AA or KK here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 11:39am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 770 WPP: 109
Location: Watching spoon stroke his own ego
|
|
| Deanglow wrote: | | This is the easiest fold ever. Fnord knows what I have and wouldn't try and get some random terrible 200NL nit regular off of AA or KK here. | we have him at 14% pfr over a small sample size. I don't know a goddamn thing about 200nl, maybe by the time I get there my ideas will change. Right now, if I see a guy with 14% pfr over a small sample size, I consider him a lagtard until proven otherwise (despite the fact that I generally run higher than that). Call. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 12:12pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Posts: 186 WPP: 66
Location: Sweden
|
|
| dev wrote: | | Deanglow wrote: | | This is the easiest fold ever. Fnord knows what I have and wouldn't try and get some random terrible 200NL nit regular off of AA or KK here. | we have him at 14% pfr over a small sample size. I don't know a goddamn thing about 200nl, maybe by the time I get there my ideas will change. Right now, if I see a guy with 14% pfr over a small sample size, I consider him a lagtard until proven otherwise (despite the fact that I generally run higher than that). Call. |
Well we are running a lower then 10% pfr, so we are the random nit in his eyes. That said, perhaps the point is that we dont know Fnord is a thinking player at all but only a random dude running 14% pfr. It's like info we dont know if we should adding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 12:58pm Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4642 WPP: 90
Location: TagFish
|
|
| This is probably a fold against most nits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 1:05pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 336 WPP: 74
Location: UK, Brighton
|
|
surely a randomn nit will bet once again on either street with AA/KK and by then is glued to the pot which is why QQ JJ doesn't need to shove back here. Shoving just allows the weaker parts of our range to get away with least damage, even if we intend to continue with check fold after our cbet because we wiffed.
Also because you are all saying fold there also must be a lot of fold equity against a nit because the only hand you are not folding is JJ and QQ. In a way that widens someones shove range.
I still struggle not to call even if the only hand we beat is AQ. I feel like I'm bonkers. I also don't see any 8+ out draws here so I can't see why someone shoves here which is the only remaining excuse to do so.
To the shove we auto fold everything apart from JJ+, if we add KK to that we are stuffed imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 1:30pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17644 WPP: 82
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| MuddyWicket seems about a half a step further down the rabbit hole... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 2:12pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 336 WPP: 74
Location: UK, Brighton
|
|
| should I stop digging? my brain is hurtin...please put me out of my misery. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 2:14pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3550 WPP: 75
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
| Our nitty stats + probably rare 3-bet allow Fnord to put us on a close to exact hand. Sets don't usually shove here which is why we call and why Fnord shoves a set. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 2:21pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 336 WPP: 74
Location: UK, Brighton
|
|
| ah now that makes sense to me. the relief....ty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 2:47pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 31 WPP: 220
|
|
I flopped a strong overpair on a dry board with an SPR of 3. I think I have to call Fnord here. If he is set hunting me with 10.5:1 odds, then he is losing money in the long run. If he called with AA, then its a cooler. If his range is wider than AA/JJ/QQ/33, its a definite call.
If I fold this, I might as well stop 3-betting him completely. The metagame consequences are huge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 3:29pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 1622 WPP: 47
Location: Gainesville
|
|
| Quote: | | we have him at 14% pfr over a small sample size. I don't know a goddamn thing about 200nl, maybe by the time I get there my ideas will change. Right now, if I see a guy with 14% pfr over a small sample size, I consider him a lagtard until proven otherwise (despite the fact that I generally run higher than that). Call. |
WOW I never thought I would see the day when 14% pfr was considered a lagtard. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 3:32pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 770 WPP: 109
Location: Watching spoon stroke his own ego
|
|
| Deanglow wrote: | | Quote: | | we have him at 14% pfr over a small sample size. I don't know a goddamn thing about 200nl, maybe by the time I get there my ideas will change. Right now, if I see a guy with 14% pfr over a small sample size, I consider him a lagtard until proven otherwise (despite the fact that I generally run higher than that). Call. |
WOW I never thought I would see the day when 14% pfr was considered a lagtard. | Maybe it's just that I'm used to incredibly passive 25nl. I was on a table today running 10/10 (card-dead) over ~50 hands and I had the highest pfr% on the table. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 3:37pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17644 WPP: 82
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| I can't stand to play any flavor of hold'em with a PFR under 10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 4:22pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Almost as bad as that idiot redgrape

Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 6112 WPP: 73
|
|
| I never fold here. Always call. I will not give Fnord credit for shoving top set or midset on this board at a high enough frequency to make me want to fold, nor should he be shoving QQ/JJ/33 with a high frequency. Even if we used a strict range of 33, JJ+, and AQ with no weight it's probably really really close. |
|
|
|
|
|