|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 1:15pm Post subject: Insider Information: All poker rooms are rigged |
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 18 WPP: 401
|
|
Hi, my name is Esko and am a finnish software engineer - i am on vacation in Italy now and took some time to write this post.
Until the 31st of december 2007 i have been working at one of the major poker sites as a programmer and now that my contract has expired i would like to share some simple info with you that should make you more aware of what you're dealing with.
Ever wondered why so many times you see AA vs KK preflop? Why you or your opponent hit that straight at the river? Why more often than it ought be fish playing with rags flops a monster?
All poker room's random card generators are not as random as you'd expect them to be: let's say they're SEMI-random. I'll explain in simple words how it works, at least how the one i've been programming and revising works.
Out of 100 hands (i use 100 to simplify) dealt, at least 50 are completely random - we used a complex algorythm to generate the cards which i won't explain in detail - what happens to the rest of the hands? Well they're semi-random because at times at least 2 players (randomly chosen) get one of the following: suited connectors, connectors, ace-x suited, AK or big pocket pairs and at the same time the flop gives both (or more) of them good odds for improving their hand or a made hand. Then the engine does the following - algorythms may vary whether it is a ring game or a tournament - it favors the stronger player, the one with the most chips. But remember, it is not always like that, but the odds are in his favor let's say 60/70 out of 100 times. At times, instead, just to mix things up, it favors those who play with rags like Q7 or 36 giving them made hands at the flop , just to make it more likely they will slowplay, get called and then go all in at showdown.
Other times the game looks like a regular game but then comes the miracle river, i.e. a card that would make one player the flush and the other the full house...
Well, this is a simplification, the overall trick is very complex and very subtle to detect, but what it does is essentially make tourneys finish faster and make ring games get richer pots with players busting out sooner and looser players stay in the game and make the game go more crazy than it otherwise would be.
I repeat, the system works in very subtle ways, but the main outcome is this:
Faster tourneys=more tourneys x hour=more people buying in=more $$
More people busting out in ring games=more $$ deposited
More loose play="Any two will do" mentality=more $$ coming in as rakes
And don't come telling me about game commissions, random generators checked out etc.etc. - it's all bullshit - besides being the algorythms very subtle (yet effective) thus not easily detectable, some commisions can be easily manipulated, tricked, bribed etc etc. -
What is detectable is the outcome: more monster hands being flopped, more AA vs KK preflop all-ins, more "miracle" river cards etc.etc. but what commissions are approving are the seemingly "random" card generators (rember: the cards are random but the outcome of the hand is not!), not the odds they get out of 100.000 recorded hands so although the end of day stats show that the game is clearly rigged because of the clearly impossible high number of monster hands clashing with one another, your average poker room has a RNG commission-approved, fish players are happy because * at times * they win big with rags at the flop and good players are happy because * at times * their solid play works and they get called to the river. Well, it's your old casino system at work, (if they guy next to me hit the jackpot, it could happen to me too) but in poker rooms it is disguised as a fair and truly level and random game between players, as if the house was just there as a service provider.
Tip nr.1: If in a multi table tournament you're a short stack, your chances of making it to the money are much lower than what you think.
Tip nr.2:Be aware to go all-in preflop with KK because it is likely someone else will call you with AA!
Tip nr.3:Be aware to go all-in preflop with AA (especially if you're a short stack )- the big stack next to you will call with 22 and flop a set or a flush more often than what the odds say!
So, in the end, forget Doyle Brunson's SuperSystem, Phil Hellmuth's Play like the pros and even Poker for Dummies when you're online, because at your poker room the outcome is more doomed by chance than what your Odds Calculators say and the house has a big edge, and is not a mere spectator dealing cards.
P.S.: And what about the pros playing at some major sites? well you think they are featured for free? Of course they get paid to play at that site, shut up about odds and praise that room on gambling magazines: oh look! Mr. XYZ plays at ABC! if he plays there it must be a great site with a truly fair game! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 1:25pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 2936 WPP: 109
|
|
Wow, you have no idea, do you? Just the wording in your post tells us that you have no clue what you are talking about. Tell you what mister Algorithm expert, why don't you lose the laymans terms and speak the speak. We have enough guys here that know a thing or two. Show us some proof.
And your theory's as to why they would cheat, are not the reasons for cheating.
You are hidden behind a fake name, so name some names, and some sites. Post some examples, for one, why would a multi million dollar business allow someone with this info, run out a contract? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 1:37pm Post subject: |
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 18 WPP: 401
|
|
| Trainer_jyms wrote: | Wow, you have no idea, do you? Just the wording in your post tells us that you have no clue what you are talking about. Tell you what mister Algorithm expert, why don't you lose the laymans terms and speak the speak. We have enough guys here that know a thing or two. Show us some proof.
|
I use layman words because i see no point in explaining to a poker forum how a matrix linear recurrence is used in a Mersenne twister to pseudo-generate cards.
| Trainer_jyms wrote: | And your theory's as to why they would cheat, are not the reasons for cheating.
|
Well the reason is what makes the world go round: more money
| Trainer_jyms wrote: | You are hidden behind a fake name, so name some names, and some sites. Post some examples, for one, why would a multi million dollar business allow someone with this info, run out a contract?
|
Lol you want me to get sued by a multimillion dollars corporation legal office?
My contract has expired because not everybody works forever at the same place - hasn't it dawned on you i might have gotten a better job somewhere else and quit? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 1:43pm Post subject: |
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3541 WPP: 75
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 1:57pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 326 WPP: 123
|
|
with so many people who play seriously using tools like PokerTracker and whatnot, don't you think communities like FTR and 2+2 can fairly easily refute whatever you're claiming? Isnt there a handy tool that shows you how often you were dealt AA vs KK?
in any case i do not understand why people like you make such massively long troll posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 2:00pm Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 225 WPP: 82
Location: Lincoln, UK
|
|
Hi Esko,
why havent you used your Mersenne twister pseudo card generator to go and pwn high stakes? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 2:08pm Post subject: |
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 18 WPP: 401
|
|
| eugmac wrote: | with so many people who play seriously using tools like PokerTracker and whatnot, don't you think communities like FTR and 2+2 can fairly easily refute whatever you're claiming? Isnt there a handy tool that shows you how often you were dealt AA vs KK?
in any case i do not understand why people like you make such massively long troll posts. |
You're missing the point.
The single user cannot easily detect that his game or the guy next door's game is rigged. But if you take all the hands played in a single day at a major room you'll see that the number of made hands per table (which translates in people calling and going to showdowns) is significantly higher than what statistics would predict.
The AA vs KK is an over simplification of the issue - i told the the system is VERY SUBTLE so you can't easily detect a pattern with a tool like PokerTracker - what the system does in the end is assure a growing cash flow to the site, far greater than what it would be if the outcome of the hands was completely and genuinely random.
Anyway i knew i would get bashed by posting this stuff in a poker supporters forum - you beleive what you want to beleive - if you make money on a regular basis good for you - i just wanted to warn the guy from the street what he's dealing with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 2:11pm Post subject: |
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 18 WPP: 401
|
|
| Taxi wrote: | Hi Esko,
why havent you used your Mersenne twister pseudo card generator to go and pwn high stakes? |
1. Because its seed is randomly generated and changed on a regular basis
2. I could cheat an easier way if i wanted to - like the guy at absolute did |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 2:29pm Post subject: |
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 18 WPP: 401
|
|
If the game is truly genuine then professional poker players would at least show some profit from the games played online, right? Wouldn't they have the edge over the fish?
Then explain me why many pros playing online tournaments show miserable results?
Isn't this a proof that online poker is doomed by chance?
Just a few regulars at Full Tilt
I'm not allowed to post links but check yourselves on official poker rankings . com (remove spaces)
Chip Jett: profit=zero
Karina Jett:profit=zero
Erick Lindgren:profit=zero
Layne Flack:profit=zero |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 2:35pm Post subject: |
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 6662 WPP: 66
Location: Somewhere in middle america
|
|
this makes sense because I couldn't figure out how online poker rooms made money.
Care to consider tip 2 and tip 3 again? It may help when you post this on 2+2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 2:39pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 102 WPP: 245
|
|
| Even if you didn't speak like a 10 year old no one here is going to believe if you if you don't post any proof. Admin's please delete this post as if it deters fish from depositing, we all suffer for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 2:47pm Post subject: |
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 4864 WPP: 82
Location: Pwnsylvania
|
|
ahahaha Chip/Karina Jett are notorious for going busto, live and online.
Lindgren is meh, he makes most of his money from staking other players and investments and Flack is just a spew-monkey in general which works less online because of the style of play. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 3:13pm Post subject: |
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 18 WPP: 401
|
|
From cardschat . com
I know a programmer who helped create the Poker Stars shuffle.According to him it is rigged as its a necessary evil from a business standpoint. Though not rigged for a specific individual the hands are rigged in a number of ways.First and foremost,80% of players on Poker Stars are bad poker players,the kind that call big bets on low percentage hands,or will even raise themselves on a bad hand.If it fell according to normal percentages the poker sharks would drain such players and drain them real quick.If a bad player was contstantly losing his butt he would get frustrated and not come back.If the 80% of bad players all left,so goes 80% of the sites profits with them.By rigging it to dish alot of bad river beats it gives bad players who should have folded out a more even playing field with the sharks who would have taken all their cash.Its not just about bad beats either.Your chip count matters especially in tournies.In a tourney if you have the highest stack in the hand being played its programmed for the come from behind beats on 4th or river 70% of the time if the higher calls the lows all in.You'll see it happen constantly a hand where a lower chips goes all in preflop with pocket aces and a high stacks calls with like a 4 and 5 off suit.Flop dishes a 3rd ace with king and ten,last two cards 2 and 3 to give it to the higher chip caller with the ace to 5 straight.By rigging it this way it puts the odds with higher chips regardless of who had the percentages to win but keeps it so in the long run all the low chip callers do get some hits to block the arguement its rigged.Thats the key is to rig it at a certain percentage this way a trend don't happen all the time,the low chips can still hit the high chip at 30% to quell any arguement that its plain out rigged for the high chip (which technically it is if its going to give it to him 70% of the time regardless of what high chips came in with).You'll also notice if you pay attention that the first 4 cards flopped are often two of two different suits to leave flush possibilities for multiple hands going into the river,and often these also have a straight draw potential in their to keep the max amount in the hand betting big.Many times that final river card in these situations will dish a flush but with a card that also gave another caller his straight.Its by design this is not a coincidence.The program is alot more complicated then people even realize.
The endorsements of this site are paid for endorsements with the companies taking Poker Stars at their word of how the shuffle works,these companies didn't pay any programmer to comb through the program and actually see how the shuffle happens in reality.I asked the exact same question to him as people here ask,why would they risk rigging it if where people could figure it out and stop playing there.He said "Simply put,the general masses are really stupid and are willing to trust any business unless there is clear cut proof of rigging.As long as the low chips don't get bad beat every single hand they all in they can't claim its always rigged for high chips,as long as bad river fish don't win on the river everytime people can't say the rivers are rigged so thats why you rig it at a certain percentage so its not really able to be proven cause anyone can win the hand even if the percentages are fixed based on chip count and table action as opposed to the percentages based on the cards.He even told me of a time the program hit a glitch and all tournies for the day had to be shut down while they figured out what happened with the program.In dealing its usual drama hands to keep table action high in a tourney,the program miscalculated and threw a 5th ace.I actually looked it up on search engines to see if anyone ever spoke of this and found a screen shot of the tourney he was talking about http :// wtfpokerstars . ytmnd . com (remove spaces). They had to fine tune the program to make sure it didn't misread whats left in the deck again but the rigged drama flops remain in play,thats part was never altered.I asked him how they could get away with it if they were caught red handed,explanation "Well if people who saw it want an explanation its simple,tell them it was a hacker who compromised the shuffle and make the guy who got the five aces sign up with a new screen name and inform him if he talks about what happened in game rooms,specifically mentioning that the 5th ace came from Poker Stars end and not from some program he was using,he would be banned".
So to sum it up they rig the site cause they know they can and its not just to make a few bucks,over the course of a year the way its programmed it generates them multi millions more in profits and its done in a way that can look questionable too many but can never really be proven.They bank on the majority trusting them unless actual positive proof can be shown its rigged (which it never can be unless a hacker got into their program and actually spelled it out for us exactly how the shuffle is working).If you read message boards all over the web you will see they made the right gamble cause the majority of people stick up for them and say "its not rigged,that would be stupid what could they gain from that?" The answer is they gain alot from that and by keeping it rigged specifically by a certain percentage to give the bad rivers and such,its kept so that the sharks can't take all the bad players money but at the same time the sharks will still get their own share of wins to keep everyone happy (or so they theorized).I play there myself,just the free money for fun and to watch to see if the trends he spoke of is true and the way the flops happen with alot of river beats,and specifically alot of higher chips players getting bailed out of low percentage hands on the river and it is very consistent with the system he explained to me.So you can all debate about if its rigged or not.I will go with the words of an actual creator of the shuffle.He had to sign a secrecy form on how the shuffle works so that the prgrammers can't speak publicly and compromise the sites integrity.I on the other hand am just a friend of his and signed nothing,just relaying what i heard to keep players informed and save them from having their money stolen from them *winks* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 3:29pm Post subject: |
|
|
But who will mod the mods?!

Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 5086 WPP: 107
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
|
|
| PokerInsider wrote: | | the big stack next to you will call with 22 and flop a set or a flush |
Calling with 22 and flopping a flush??? WOW! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 3:35pm Post subject: |
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 18 WPP: 401
|
|
| Xianti wrote: | | PokerInsider wrote: | | the big stack next to you will call with 22 and flop a set or a flush |
Calling with 22 and flopping a flush??? WOW! |
Do i need to explain every single meaning of what i write or could you put your two neurons to work and understand that this was just an example? Do i need to add to that phrase the following:
..call with 22 or any two suited cards...
Is it clear now?
Happy now? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 3:42pm Post subject: |
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3541 WPP: 75
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
Insider,
Even if what you say is true, if it's rigged equally against all players, is it still rigged? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2008, 3:50pm Post subject: |
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 18 WPP: 401
|
|
| Warpe wrote: | Insider,
Even if what you say is true, if it's rigged equally against all players, is it still rigged? |
Yes - that's exactly the point - it's rigged against all players so that no one can see a clear pattern -
it's equally rigged against all players because only one stands to benefit - the dealer.
I'd like to add the following taken from another forum - soory for the long post but it's worth a read
* The Argument FOR Online Abuse *
The shame of this whole deal is that the online poker sites could, if they wanted, end all of this speculation. However, they have elected not to do this. They have the power, if they really wanted, to put an end to any speculation about the legitimacy of the online gaming experience. And let’s be very honest – most of the top B&M players that I know are skeptical of the online poker sites and will not play their with their own money. This includes some of the very best players around. These are not people who are being paid to shill for online sites (and even those do not play with their own money – they play their minimum appearance tourneys with house money).
I think I have heard all of the arguments AGAINST online rigging. There are basically 8 that I count. Let’s list them and review them. Here they are – the 8 reasons people give you why online poker isn’t rigged – let’s list them and take a critical look at them and see which of them, if any, hold any water. Basically, here’s the list:
1) The Loser
2) Mission Impossible
3) The Public Company
4) Nothing to be Gained
5) So Much to Lose
6) The Black Box
7) More Hands = More Goofy Shit
8) The Leap of Faith
Of these, as you will see, after putting these under a microscope, only #8 holds any water.
1) THE LOSER – it goes something like this: “you’re just a sore loser and if you were winning you wouldn’t say this.” Frankly, I’m not, but really it doesn’t really make any difference. I have quite a few final table appearances to my credit in $1,000 or higher buy-in national/international events including WPT and WSOP. My total deposits to online poker rooms are less than 1/1,000,000 of my net worth, so even if I lost every single hand, it would be irrelevant. Just because I am willing to take a look at it or have a skeptical outlook, doesn’t mean I’m a loser.
2) MISSION IMPOSSIBLE – this defense tries to convince you that fixing a poker program would be the equivalent of splitting atoms. This is a poker program – we aren’t enriching uranium! I’m not a computer programmer, but I know quite a few, including a couple who specialize in computer games. They assure me that making something happen in a poker program is basically programming 101. If they wanted 3-8 off to beat AA every time, this would be easily done in the context of a program without adjusting the output of a random number generator.
3) THE PUBLIC COMPANY – this is a relatively new one that seems to have popped up as though it has been fed to the masses like some kind of mantra. It ranks very high up on the laugh meter. The way this goes is that by telling you that the poker site is owned by or run by, or somehow connected to a publicly traded company in England or somewhere on some stock exchange, that this somehow is some indicia of honesty. Somehow we are supposed to believe that association with a publicly traded company means there is less chance of dishonesty. Unless you’ve been living in a cave for the last 20 years or are too young to know the difference, you should understand that having something to do with a public company doesn’t mean anything. In fact, the argument can be made that it is more likely to be a sham, rather than less. Does the word ENRON ring a bell? Publicly traded. Auditors said everything was okay. Massive fraud. The whole company was a huge fraud. How about Fannie Mae? This is actually a pseudo-governmental agency which trades as a publicly traded company. 4 years of bogus financial statements, all okayed by the auditors. More fraud. I could go on and on with a litany of literally thousands of public companies who have either been convicted of fraud or who have settled before being convicted. Case closed
4) NOTHING TO BE GAINED – here’s some of the meat of the anti-rig arguments. Basically, they whine something like “why would they ever want to do that? What would they ever have to gain by doing it?” Ummmmm. Let me take one guess. Ummmmm….. MORE MONEY? Actually, they have nothing to gain by determining outcomes ahead of time, and from what I hear, they don’t. But they do have much to gain from doing one thing. Lets for the sake of simplicity divide players into 2 groups. Winners and losers. Money flows from the hands of the weak to the hands of the strong. It doesn’t do this in a straight line. And it doesn’t go directly from the weakest to the strongest. It goes in a chain much like the food chain in an ocean. It goes in and out like the tide, moving in one direction, then another, then back.. and so on and so on, like the tide. Then it moves from one level to the next that way, and from that level to the next higher level in that same way. The online casinos know the same thing that land based casinos know with their slots. It is this: in any exchange among groups, the slower the rate of loss, the greater the chance that they will get additional fresh money put into the system when someone taps out. Same with slots. They’ve tested it. They can have machines that have the same exact payout %. One is a high-volatility machine (less number of pays, average pay higher) and the other are low-volatility machines which give lesser payouts, but more frequently. The end result is the same because the payout % for a machine is fixed in the factory. The players who play the lower volatility machine are much more likely to put more money in because they feel like they have gotten more play for their money. It’s the same with online poker. The sites know that if they can slow up the rate of loss, these same players will eventually lose, but they will be ensuring a much higher rate of additional deposits. How do they do this? By creating situations where the chances of various hands winning versus each other are much closer to 50-50 then the true odds should be. That’s all. It’s that simple. Nothing with marking your account after you withdraw or targeting you. No conspiracy. No flops that are arranged in order to increase the rake. No nothing. The fish like it, cuz they loser slower. The sharks like it cuz it means ultimately that more fresh money is going to come into the system and work it’s way up the food chain. So, when all is said and done, they have plenty to gain from “adjusting” the process to suit their needs.
5) SO MUCH TO LOSE – goes like this. “Why would they risk their business by doing this? Why would they risk losing customers? They have so much to lose. Why kill the golden goose?” Etc. Well, really what do they have to lose. Customers? I think not. After all, how many customers did the cigarette companies lose when they decided to print on the side of the packs “hey dooshbag – thanks for paying us for killing you!”? Answer – none. Not a single person on the whole planet every stopped smoking because of the death warning on the pack. Why not? Because the vast majority of their customers didn’t have a choice – THEY WERE ADICTED TO THE PRODUCT. And I know whoever you are that is reading this, I’m sure I’m not talking to you – I’m talking to some other guy. The same goes for online poker players. The vast majorities of them are to some degree, addicted and will not stop until they lose all their money and run out of credit. Gambling is an addiction. The online sites know this, and so they know that basically you aren’t going anywhere because YOU’RE HOOKED (not you, the other guy next to you).
What else do they have to lose? Nothing. You can’t sue them. You have no recourse whatsoever. They are completely unregulated and report to nobody and can do whatever they please. So basically, they have NO DOWNSIDE to doing anything that they feel increases their business.
6) THE BLACK BOX – different variations of this. One aspect of this is that “the random number generator has been certified by some accounting firm.” Bullshit. Double Bullshit and MORE BULLSHIT. There are no generally accepted accounting standards for measuring random number generators. Also, as we have learned unfortunately in the world of corporate audits – the fact that a public accounting firm says its okay doesn’t mean shit. Also, just because the random number generator is working right, it does not mean that the entire gaming engine is on the level. The RNG is only one part of a much larger program. It’s presentation of cards to the tables and related matters that count. There were several very notable examples in the world of computer backgammon where a site which published its dice stats showing that the RNG was good – but evidence was presented indicating that allocation of dice to tables was flawed.
The other black box aspect is that “well, in a casino you can see the cards so you don’t blame the cards – just because it’s a computer, you are complaining that it’s rigged.’ There’s a lot of truth to this. There really is nothing you can say directly against this because what they are describing is basic human nature – not wanting to take responsibility and finding a scapegoat. But I think this is where the online sites let the cat out of the bag and show that they have no desire or intention of squelching the skeptics, perhaps because they cannot. The simple solution here is to allow your entire gaming engine top to bottom examined and certified by a completely independent outside authority ( not your own self-created paid dues-club either). There are a small number of sites who have done this. Please note that just because it was done once doesn’t mean that they couldn’t have changed the programming later, but at least they had something like that done at some time, and we have to give those sites at least the benefit of some doubt. After all, what are they supposed to do, have their entire program audited every day? That would be akin to asking a baseball player to pee into a bottle before every at bat. But the vast majority of the well known poker sites have NOT completed such a procedure at any time and, from what I hear, have no interest in doing so. A few started such a process, but aborted. Hmmmm. It would appear that if squelching the skeptics was as easy as this, why wouldn’t the sites all gladly line up to do it? Do they have something to hide? Sounds like they are doing the cyber equivalent of “taking the fifth”. What goes through your mind when you hear someone say “I refuse to testify on the grounds that I might incriminate myself!”? I know what goes through my mind when I hear that – GUILTY, that’s what!
And all this nonsense about making online poker legal and regulated?? Whose idea is this? Not the poker sites, that for sure. None of them have any interest whatsoever in having their industry regulated. Among the reasons why is clearly this topic. Having online poker regulated would in fact force them to have legit games. If you are old enough to remember the pre-corporate Vegas or know much about the history of the town, then you know that there was indeed a time when the place was run by guys like Don Corleone and illegitimate games were quite common. Of course today, the city is regulated and all the machines, table games, etc all have to be on the up and up. The online poker world is still like Vegas in the 50’s and 60’s. They have NO DESIRE to change this unless they are absolutely forced to.
You know all these letters that people are being encouraged to write to your senators and congressmen? These letters propose that they make online poker legal and regulate it like other industries? Personally, regardless of what side of the political isle you reside on, I encourage you to write your senators and congressmen. But if you are going to do it, do it about something important. Might I suggest topics such as illegal immigration and border security, terrorism, global warming and alternative energy, the war in Iraq. But please don’t bother them with online dooshbag poker, okay? They should be spending their time and my tax dollars on something important. But I digress. Where was I? Oh yeah, the letters. Ya notice who is encouraging us to write these letters asking for regulation of the online poker? The dooshbags at Pocket Fives . com, that’s who. Did you get any letter from Ultimate Bet asking you to write your congressmen asking for regulation?? Did you get one from PokerStars? How bout Full Tilt? Paradise? Not me. I didn’t receive a single request from any of those sites | | | |