| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sat, 29 Sep 2007, 11:29pm Post subject: are the $4 180's more fishy than ever? |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 280
WPP: 98
|
|
i just played 3 in a row. it seems 80% of all limpers will call raises of 6-8xbb.
this scenario is very common in the first hour: limp, fold, fold, limp, limp, RAISE to 8xbb, someone calls behind and then all limpers call.
it's friday night. maybe that has something to do with it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 30 Sep 2007, 6:36am Post subject: Re: are the $4 180's more fishy than ever? |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 75
WPP: 111
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
|
|
| CorbinDallas wrote: | i just played 3 in a row. it seems 80% of all limpers will call raises of 6-8xbb.
this scenario is very common in the first hour: limp, fold, fold, limp, limp, RAISE to 8xbb, someone calls behind and then all limpers call.
it's friday night. maybe that has something to do with it? |
They're very fishy indeed. By the time you get to the 1st break there'll usually be about 60 players remaining, yes 66% of players would have been eliminated. They can be profitable if you're a good player. I've only won 2 but I always play for 1st place and nothing lesser. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 30 Sep 2007, 9:31am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 280
WPP: 98
|
|
| is the $20 better? i wish stars hadn't eliminated the $10. i don't like turbos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 30 Sep 2007, 2:36pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 1474
WPP: 46
Location: Gainesville
|
|
| $20 aren't as fishy but still very soft. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
