| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 6:49am Post subject: Which bluff got called?
|
 |
|
One Pair
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 612
WPP: 107
|
|
These are all from the same aggressive hu session.
Three bluffs, what do you think about these? One got called, but which one?
NR 1:
Ongame Texas Hold'em $6-$12 NL (real money)
Seat 7: BB ($3,074.80 in chips)
Seat 10: HERO [ AD,KC ] ($961.00 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
HERO posts blind ($3), BB posts blind ($6).
PRE-FLOP
HERO bets $15, BB calls $12.
FLOP [board cards 8D,4D,JC ]
BB checks, HERO bets $45, BB calls $45.
TURN [board cards 8D,4D,JC,5S ]
BB checks, HERO bets $90, BB calls $90.
RIVER [board cards 8D,4D,JC,5S,QH ]
BB bets $200, HERO bets $550...
-------------
NR 2:
Ongame Texas Hold'em $6-$12 NL (real money)
Seat 7: BUTTON ($2,885.80 in chips)
Seat 10: HERO [ 8H,KH ] ($826.00 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
BUTTON posts blind ($3), HERO posts blind ($6).
PRE-FLOP
BUTTON bets $17, HERO calls $14.
FLOP [board cards 2S,4S,7S ]
HERO bets $42, BUTTON calls $42.
TURN [board cards 2S,4S,7S,6S ]
HERO bets $99, BUTTON calls $99.
RIVER [board cards 2S,4S,7S,6S,9H ]
HERO bets $300...
-------------
NR 3:
Ongame Texas Hold'em $6-$12 NL (real money)
Seat 7: BUTTON ($2,190.40 in chips)
Seat 9: HERO [ 5C,5H ] ($1513.00 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
BUTTON posts blind ($3), HERO posts blind ($6).
PRE-FLOP
BUTTON bets $17, HERO bets $66, BUTTON calls $52.
FLOP [board cards QS,TH,8D ]
HERO bets $150, BUTTON calls $150.
TURN [board cards QS,TH,8D,9H ]
HERO checks, BB bets $150, HERO bets $450... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 7:09am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 1000
WPP: 88
Location: Deventer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 8:44am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 264
WPP: 370
|
|
| 1st - its likely has either 9 10 or JQ here and I think they would both call, or raise in 9 10's case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 9:02am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 1965
WPP: 55
Location: Dizzy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 1:04pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 585
WPP: 56
Location: In S-mart Swallowing Your Soul!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 1:55pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 2911
WPP: 107
|
|
1st seems like it would be called because the bet is so small relative to pot, but that's too obvious.
3rd, because how can he call 2 bets with no spade, then fold? A set? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 3:51pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 1713
WPP: 151
Location: Kansas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 6:55pm Post subject:
|
|
|
One Pair
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 612
WPP: 107
|
|
| zenbitz wrote: | 1st seems like it would be called because the bet is so small relative to pot, but that's too obvious.
3rd, because how can he call 2 bets with no spade, then fold? A set? |
In nr2 villain of course has a spade. But he knows that I know that he has a spade. So how good does your Queen high flush look when a guy who knows you have a flush is betting the pot into you on the river?
I know that he knows that I know that he has a spade. Would then be quite crazy to bluff here, right? WRONG! It's clearly a very good spot to rep the Ace of spades, because it sure doesn't look like he has it... I also bet the flop, which adds to the probability that i've got it.
Dont try this at low stakes though... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 10:26pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Almost as bad as that idiot redgrape
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 6152
WPP: 73
|
|
| nice analysis on hand 2, however opp could also show up with a set here which he has to fold on the river i'd assume. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 21 Jul 2007, 9:09pm Post subject:
|
|
|
One Pair
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 612
WPP: 107
|
|
| IowaSkinsFan wrote: | | nice analysis on hand 2, however opp could also show up with a set here which he has to fold on the river i'd assume. |
Well a set could work as a bluffcatcher I guess, but I would never call a pot sized bet with a set here, no matter how much I suspected a bluff.
Result: NR 3 got called. Villain turned two pair with Q9.
In NR 3 I was trying to check down my pocket fives on the turn, but when villain weak-bet, I thought I could steal it easily. I guess I got levelled myself here... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$200 Freeroll at PokerStars - Jan 14 @ 20:00 ET
