| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sat, 30 Jun 2007, 1:56pm Post subject: Casino hand against solid players |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 697 WPP: 116
Location: Santa Cruz
|
|
I have been sitting at this table for about 5 hours and it is filled with all solid players. I have never experienced a table like this before at a casino, everyone plays TAG and is good. I had been trying to get floor to move me with no avail for a long time. Villain is a standard TAG, does not seem to do anything too tricky, he is capable of floating and pouncing on weakness and laying down good hands to the right board. We have not tangoed too much but when he did he took down a big pot from me with a straight against my trips. I have been playing a lot of hands fast and got called on a big turn over push with top pair+flush draw and I sucked out hitting two pair on the river (my kicker was beat for top pair). I know he is good enough to pick up on my playing patterns.
Blinds 2/2 9 handed effective stacks $175
Hero has UTG and raises to $10
folded to MP1 who reraises to $25
Now I had seen villain re-raise once with AA and another time with QQ. I put his range on something like AK+ JJ+. Even though he is solid I do not see him doing this without a really good hand. I call becasue I figure I can set hunt.
Pot is around $50
Flop comes
Money!!! I hit my set. My line is......... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 30 Jun 2007, 3:14pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 697 WPP: 116
Location: Santa Cruz
|
|
flop goes check/check
turn is 7d
line check please.......
*flop was pretty std, adding this for more info and more intrest* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 30 Jun 2007, 4:44pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 1263 WPP: 105
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
|
Bet the flop. Villain could be slowplaying AQ, a flush could hit on turn, KJ makes a straight with a 10 on turn... We want to build pot, so I bet $35 on flop.
you made your set and he's tight, so he's probably hit the flop. Bet.
As played, I bet $50 on flop. We need to build pot and full bet may look bluffy. there are also now 2 FD's. If he re-raises, push. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 30 Jun 2007, 7:05pm Post subject: Q |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 697 WPP: 116
Location: Santa Cruz
|
|
I was thinking donking into villain here would be a good play. If I throw out what looks like a weak feeler bet I am pretty sure he raises as that is std. If he raises I get an easy push over him, but at the time I did not think about it. I checked hoping to check raise but when he checked behind the hand changed drastically.
You mention the FD's but I am not worried at all about them. The flop spade draw is not in villains range, the only hand I possibly see him 3-betting with is AsKs but the As is on the board so it is not possible. Straight possibilities are also ruled out, he is not 3-betting with KJ.
As I said before his range here is AK+, JJ+. If I bet JJ folds, QQ is stacking me, KK might give me some action I just need to extract value. AA I am getting stacked and AQ I am probably stacking. AK most likely as well. How do I extract value? There are really no scare cards that can hit here except another A or Q but those could be scare cards for him too. So I definantly do not mind checking. Any thoughts guys? I thought this was a very interesting spot but it is not picking up a lot of responses from the better players who I really thought could give me some good insight. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 30 Jun 2007, 8:16pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1028 WPP: 63
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
If his reraising range is AQ+/JJ+....
It's one of those WA/WB situations. I can't see him checking behind here with AK/AQ, possibly JJ/KK, but you aren't going to get much action from these I don't think. I suppose KK might think he's ahead on the turn with the c/c fop.
The other possibilities are QQ and AA, unless his 3-bet rnge is wider than you think?
My question really is why is a 3 bettor checking this flop, he either has a monster AA/QQ or is scared of the A (JJ/KK) and you aren't going to get much money out of him here.
Anyway as for the play, I think I lead out on the flop, try to build a pot and hope he has AK/AQ, he's folding JJ and maybe KK - might call and fold to heat on the turn. AA/QQ are the only other parts of his range, if his 3-bets are a pretty tight range as you suggest and these are crushing you.
In the heat of the moment, I'm not sure I could fold a set here, but if you get sufficient action like a reraise on the turn if you lead out, the only hand that your beating is AQ if your sure about his range.
Like I say I lead out here on the flop, but as played with the check/check on the flop. I'd lead out on the turn call a raise and maybe check call the river...but thats with sufficient thought. If I wasn't thinking deep I'd probably push over a raise on the turn. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 30 Jun 2007, 8:29pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17391 WPP: 82
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
Check the turn too. This hand reeks.
You guys are giving him WAY too much credit pre-flop, althought the small re-pop has alarm bells going off.
After the flop check behind I put his range at:
AA/QQ/AK/AQ/KK/JJ/TT with some trash thrown in where he got too chicken shit to bet a great board for him or picked up a signal that you were strong.
Check and keep a really close eye on his body language. |
Last edited by Fnord on Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 9:10am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 01 Jul 2007, 6:26pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 341 WPP: 115
|
|
Fnord, you suck.
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
44,550 games 0.375 secs 118,800 games/sec
Board: As 9s Qd
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 76.884% 76.88% 00.00% 34252 0.00 { 9c9h }
Hand 1: 23.116% 23.12% 00.00% 10298 0.00 { TT+, AQs+, AQo+ } |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 01 Jul 2007, 9:17pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 697 WPP: 116
Location: Santa Cruz
|
|
| Who thinks donking the flop here is a good play? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 8:10am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 341 WPP: 115
|
|
| You're way ahead of everything but QQ and AA, I don't see why a flop lead is a bad idea, if he's got AQ he'll think you have AK and might even overshove. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 9:49am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 341 WPP: 115
|
|
A little more math for you (this is all based on the board as of the flop):
Villian has 6 ways of either having AA or QQ (3 for AA, 3 for QQ):
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 04.343% 04.34% 00.00% 258 0.00 { 9c9h }
Hand 1: 95.657% 95.66% 00.00% 5682 0.00 { AA, QQ }
There are 9 ways the Villian could have AQ.
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 81.717% 81.72% 00.00% 7281 0.00 { 9c9h }
Hand 1: 18.283% 18.28% 00.00% 1629 0.00 { AQs, AQo }
There are 12 ways the villian could have AK:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 95.286% 95.29% 00.00% 11320 0.00 { 9c9h }
Hand 1: 04.714% 04.71% 00.00% 560 0.00 { AKs, AKo }
There are 18 ways he could have TT,JJ, or KK:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 86.380% 86.38% 00.00% 15393 0.00 { 9c9h }
Hand 1: 13.620% 13.62% 00.00% 2427 0.00 { KK, JJ-TT }
So our equity function looks something like this if we assume he calls with AQ,AA,QQ every time, calls with AK 50% of the time and will always fold TT,JJ, and KK.
(6/45)(0.95)(-150)+(6/45)(0.05)(350)+(9/45)(0.818)(350)+(9/45)(0.182)(-150)+(12/45)(0.953)(0.50)(350)+(12/45)(0.50)(50)+(12/45)(0.047)(0.50)(-150)+(18/45)(50):
$105.33 +EV.
Gamboooooooooool. Open shove the the flop looks like a really good play. |
Last edited by overflow on Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 10:07am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 9:52am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 1263 WPP: 105
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
|
I'm sorry, its just too nitty to worry about AA and QQ. I bet flop $35, bet turn, felt this and I don't care at all about set over set AQ and maybe AK will act the same way. as AA and QQ probably will if you show some strength.
As played, the flop check is not terrible but I don't see why, the whole flop check then try to build a huge pot quickly reeks of a set.
You want to be playing for stacks so let's build a pot on the flop. I just posted a hand similar to this where a TAG villain had AKs and the flop was AK5 and I had 555, we both check the flop and the pot ends up being smaller because of one less betting street and a flush draw which scared him.
I think you have to at least be mindful of the flush draw, he doesn't have to have a PP just because he re-raised. Has he shown down every hand he has RR at this point? AK or AQs are likely in his range. |
Last edited by mixchange on Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 9:57am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 9:52am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 341 WPP: 115
|
|
In summary:
There are about 24 ways he folds, 15 ways you have him crushed and he calls, and 6ways he has you crushed and calls. |
Last edited by overflow on Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 9:55am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 9:54am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 341 WPP: 115
|
|
| mixchange wrote: | im sorry, its just too nitty to slowplay here and worry about AA and QQ. I bet flop, raise turn, felt this and I don't care at all about set over set AQ and maybe AK will act the same way. bet flop $35
As played, the flop check is not terrible, if he has kings he's scared of the A but then what could you have? Queens or jacks? So you wouldn't get much action out of kings imo, just bet hard and play for stacks, bet $45 on turn I want to build a pot. |
I doubt a $45bet lead on the turn is more +EV than open shoving either street. The only way shoving turns into a bad play is if he folds AK 100%, and folds AQ more than half the time. I'd have to recrunch to compensate for that though. Even then you win the $50 in the pot often enough to make up for the times you're losing $150. |
Last edited by overflow on Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 9:58am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 9:58am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 1263 WPP: 105
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
|
| open shoving is the dumbest thing I can think of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 9:59am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 341 WPP: 115
|
|
Math supports my conclusion, what supports yours?
Come up with an EV model for this situation that's more advantageous than shoving and I might agree with you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 10:05am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 341 WPP: 115
|
|
woops, my math was off, let me rerun that equity calc.
There, fixed the math, and the play is still $105.33 +EV.
Mix, I challenge you to produce an EV model for a line here that makes us more than net $105.33 when we execute it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 10:09am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 1263 WPP: 105
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
|
no offense but lets not wreck his thread with arguments about open shoving the flop. Start a new thread about open shoving flops with monsters if you want, it's not a exactly a generally accepted way to make money with your best hands. I will reply there. Your equation is mostly assumptions, poker is more reads and playing players that math
there's math, and there are humans and the way they will react to your bet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 10:11am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 341 WPP: 115
|
|
Mix, the "generally accepted" way to make money changes when you can reduce the villian's range drastically and you have a board that's favorable to his range for him to call an all-in way behind. If the flop were 973 it might be different, but it's not.
I put up equity calculations, either refute them with tangible evidence or admit that it's the most profitable play. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 10:14am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 1263 WPP: 105
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
|
| ahh I get it now how you make all that money at 10nl! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 10:20am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 341 WPP: 115
|
|
| Uhm yeah, poker = equity calculations.... Anyone want to disagree with that? The correct solution to every wagering scenario in which decisions are made on incomplete information is always based on equity calculations. And your decision is always correct, so long as the math is. Which means, as long as my EV model is very closely representing the villian's calling and folding ranges we can expect to extract that return. In this case open shoving makes us $105.33 dollars. Are there any lines that make us more? I doubt it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 10:20am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 1601 WPP: 55
Location: Looking for my anima
|
|
It's close..
Which end of his range are we shooting at? Do we go for a small pot to get money out of the lower end, or do we go apeshit and go for WA/WB vs the top end of his range?
Ughhh...
I'm quite in the mood for the former, but I'm a pessimist.
Plus we have to remember that whilst his range is narrow, ours certainly isn't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 10:24am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 341 WPP: 115
|
|
But we're WA more than we're way behind with what he's calling with generally. Unless he's a super nit that will lay down Top Two and AK 100% of the time. And even in those scenarios you're still picking up a ton of equity for what's already in the pot.
If he's willing to overshove our lead bet with hands we beat, and we're going to fold to a shove, aren't we giving up to begin with? And if we're willing to call the overshove in the first place, what do we gain by not lead-shoving, and open shoving the turn? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Jul 2007, 10:26am Post subject: |
 | |